I honestly know what you mean. But I have my principles. It's not good to use censorship to fight disinformation. It's a social problem and it's better to fight the root cause, not the symptoms.
suzune
joined 2 years ago
Every time some entity introduces censorship-like measures, the internet gets slightly worse. And I mean it from a technological perspective.
I don't like to lose good things, just because there are some morons out there.
If you can navigate masses towards X, you can also do it in the opposite direction.
I'm against banning things. It's better to teach users how not to use these platforms.
It's more effective, because it has a long term effect.
I like the Danish idea to label EU products in supermarkets. Information is a good first step.
So it's the good old client certificate authentication?
That's what I do, too. My Dovecot is at home and I collect emails from all my accounts using fetchmail.
Nice thing is Dovecot Pidgeonhole for Sieve and Flatcurve for ultrafast indexing and search.
Tja.. hätten die linken Parteien bloß auch auf die mit der schlechter wirtschaftlichen Lage einfach geschissen, dann stünden die Ergebnisse anders.
Ne... Moment... jetzt bin ich etwas verloren... hä???
Yeah, exactly. Breitbart is a source of authentic information.
Yeah, haha. 😂
Wait a moment... 🤔
Where is IT and technology?
2 HDDs (mirrored zpool), 1 SATA SSD for cache, 32 GB RAM
First read: 120 MB/s
Read while fully cached (obviously in RAM): 4.7 GB/s
When someone says they used high quality sources, they don't mean AI output.
And "might" doesn't signal a fact.
All of this shows how bad OpenAI reacts to this Open Source project. I don't blame them... it's a lot of investments that they are trying to protect.
You shouldn't ban websites. You should get the criminals.