supersquirrel

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

That is only because Aliens monitor all aircraft on earth and will if given the chance teleport-swap your hat for a UFO while it is thrown in the air (it is the perfect time to do it unfortunately). Notice how most politicians don't wear hats, it is because they know their hats were long ago replaced with alien monitoring UFOs that only look and feel like hats and they are keeping the truth from us.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 hours ago

This is mass murder done with intent.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

War broke out between Israel and Hamas on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led terrorists invaded Israel, killing some 1,200 people and kidnapping 251. Of the 50 hostages remaining in Gaza, the Israel Defense Forces have confirmed the deaths of 28.

GENOCIDE not war

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

It’s transness as desire rather than rejection.

I like this framing as it underscores naturally that much of the suffocating gender norms we live under are composed almost entirely of rejection and denial of desire (men don't wear this, women don't do that, men don't walk like that, women don't say things like that etc...) which is precisely what creates the violent force to conform.

I love this perspective because it underlines what makes transness so beautiful, it is a process of fierce desire among the deluge of rejection and denial we are all drowning in.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 0 points 11 hours ago

Oh I didn't know Intel was participating in the Palestinian Genocide along with Microsoft and other Big Tech Companies.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 21 points 12 hours ago

No, you are now renting "you" from the teleporter company that automatically copyrighted your body and genetics when you used it.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 9 points 12 hours ago

gotta sustain that bubble!

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 50 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Trump is clearly going to pardon Ghislaine

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 16 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Not "at risk", rather "gone", or "obliterated".

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Israel needs Hamas to want Palestinians to starve or else Israel doesn't have an escape goat to rationalize genociding Palestinians. As a result the narrative will be Hamas want to starve Palestinians.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Than what do you precisely mean by "easier"?

 

This community is for battlefield-like first person/third person games that are made by indie developers.

My top three favorites right now are:

  • Operation Harsh Doorstop

https://store.steampowered.com/app/736590/Operation_Harsh_Doorstop

  • Easy Red 2

https://store.steampowered.com/app/1324780/Easy_Red_2

  • Angels Fall Fall First

https://store.steampowered.com/app/367270/Angels_Fall_First/

All three of these games include large levels with mixed infantry and vehicle gameplay focused around team objectives, which is what type of game indiefield is the intended community for. Games that fit the category of "indiefield" as I am vaguely defining here don't have to have vehicles in every mode or level but they shouldn't be an afterthought and they NEED to be in the game for it to count as an "indiefield" (think battlefront as a very arcadey example).

Why "indie"?

Because AAA studios no longer seem to be interested in simply selling you a multiplayer game you can play with friends who also bought said game. Everything is lootboxes, subscriptions services, battleplasses, predatory monetization and enshittification of game mechanics and overall game quality. Am I bitter? Yes. Am I wrong? Not as wrong as I should be for how big of a generalization I just made.

There aren't a lot of indie/small developers in this genre and often the successful games get bought out by much larger studios and are slowly choked to death. Larger studios making these types of games rarely have the incentive to actually create modding tools and allow creative new ideas to spawn from the framework of their games, and in many ways the genre is often unaccessible.

I called this community "indie"-field partially because so many of these indie games value mod support from the beginning as part of the core package of the game. What I think makes moddable games in this genre so important is they inherently make a good general basis for a whole variety of other modded games.

It is such a fun genre! What I like about these games is the satisfying blend of competitive deep gameplay with the ability to play more casual and focus on supporting teammates if you want. It is a bit like feeling like you are playing in an improvised orchestra where a variety of intensities and energies are needed to make everything pull together.

Do you have any favorite games that come to mind that are indie games like this? I am also fine with conversation about non-indie games in this genre such as battlefield and battlefront too, I just intend this community to be mainly focused on indie games that don't get as much coverage or attention and that geinuinely respect the player/customer.

Games I Want To Try

  • Gates Of Hell

.... many others!

 

also see

https://www.reuters.com/world/russias-spy-agency-says-serbia-sold-ammunition-ukraine-via-bulgaria-czech-2025-06-23/

https://balkaninsight.com/2025/07/23/destination-ukraine-risking-russian-ire-serbia-clears-transit-of-bosnian-ammo/

According to Bosnian media outlet Klix.ba, the Czech Republic imported more than 30,000 artillery shells from Pretis. Though Pretis is majority-owned by the Bosnian state, US arms firm Regulus Global, which has procured arms and ammunition for Ukraine and previously Syria, holds a 41.5 per cent stake through an offshore company and recently proposed a $100 million upgrade of the company.

Regulus also owns 25.7 per cent of shares in another Bosnian arms manufacturer called Binas d.d, with Regulus CEO Joe Wallis telling Al Jazeera Balkans in July: “We see the chance to build something that serves both the European defence needs and also helps economic growth in Bosnia and Herzegovina.”

With Russia’s war in Ukraine, Wallis said artillery “is back in the centre” of modern warfare.

...

Regulus says it has delivered “more than 100,000” 155mm artillery shells to Ukraine, though it is embroiled in a court dispute in London over a $1.7 billion contract to sell such shells to the Ukrainian government, the FT reported in May.

 

Recognizing this window of opportunity and the vulnerability of the Russians, Ukrainian forces acted decisively. With Russian reserves either dead in the fields or stationed too far to provide timely reinforcements, Ukraine pressed its advantage, launching coordinated air, drone, and HIMARS missile strikes against known Russian troop concentrations in Kindrativka. Ukrainian drones methodically hunted down and eliminated Russian infantry clusters, while precise HIMARS strikes obliterated remaining fortifications and munitions stores with devastating effect. Airstrikes with AASM Hammer bombs ensured no immediate reinforcements could move forward safely, effectively neutralizing major resistance within Kindrativka itself and limiting the possibility of surviving Russian troops finding cover within the ruins.

This is what decisively losing a war sounds like.

Notice, no matter what Russia claims about how warfare is changed and they don't need armor just dirtbikes and atvs... the reason this counterattack was so costly for Russia was precisely because the infantry essentially had no access to transportation they could safely use in groups to quickly reposition to counter Ukrainian maneuvers. This is why mechanization is such an advantage in modern warfare and how it is almost shocking the degree to which Russia seems to be ignoring that reality.

Ukraine significantly disrupted Russian logistics and troop rotations, effectively sabotaging Russia’s goal of establishing drone and artillery fire control over the regional capital, Sumy.

I don't see how adding more foreign troops who probably haven't even trained with the random Russian troops they are being thrown together with into this mix is going to change things, 30,000 soldiers from any nation is nothing to dismiss especially from a nation with a large military like North Korea but I don't think it really changes the calculus. I especially don't think Russia's foreign allies are going to be happy when images and video of their long range expensive artillery systems getting repeatedly annihilated by Ukrainian drones and counter battery fire goes viral on the internet...

If Putin does not back down and agree to some sort of exit or ceasefire from this war we can only hope that Ukraine can continue to exploit this severe limitation to the Russian military in order to encircle large numbers of troops and get them to surrender without countless Ukrainians having to die in an endless battle of head on attrition that has so far typified most of the war.

 

The article seems to have kind of a negative bias to it that I don't quite understand?

Here is the Telegraph link

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2025/07/25/full-untold-story-donald-trump-u-turn-ukraine-war-us-russia/

While I think think the focus on the Patriot missiles is somewhat distracting from more crucial weapon systems like the ones I have posted in this community (155mm ammunition and artillery, HIMARS, EW/jamming/anti-drone turboprop aircraft etc...) I can absolutely see the crucial importance of these systems getting delivered.

The reason is not that Patriot missiles are necessary for the defense of the bulk population of Ukraine, it is they make it much harder for Russia to use an extremely expensive weapons system to take out a very high value civilian or military target at a crucial moment. A patriot missile defense system provides the first step of confidence to employ a whole host of other more cost effective short range and high ammunition air defense systems to counter the Russian attack on Ukrainian civilians at a mass scale.

Note however, this is not how the people selling the Patriot missile systems are going to sell it to the governments and militaries purchasing them. I invoke this as apolitically as possible but notice that with Israel's near infinite backing of US military support it never really bothered to develop air defense systems such as the Sky Sentinel, technologies Ukraine immediately understood the necessity of.

The reason isn't that Israelis are less intelligent than Ukrainians, rather it is that the US/western military industrial complex in its aid to Israel for obvious reasons favored the most expensive counters to Iranian threats they could possibly get away with. F35s, absurdly expensive missiles and other technologies certainly have their place in a wholistic air/missile defense and I am sure the air defense strategy of Israel will serve as a future blueprint for many countries but this type of extremely high cost per use air defense system is in no way sufficient to protect a civilian population at large and it wasn't really designed to...

We must ensure the whole rest of the Ukrainian air defense system is also supported, otherwise Ukraine will simply be forced to fire all the patriot missiles it gets and will run out... and then there will be 99 patriot missiles in reserve on the wall globally, rinse repeat.

One could argue that one of the Russian win conditions of the war in Ukraine must be to exhaustively deplete "western" stocks of Patriot missiles in the medium term. If Russia cannot ensure that it cannot win the Ukraine war at least in the medium term.

 

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/M142_HIMARS

The HIMARS weapon system is probably the most pivotal weapon in the defense of Ukraine behind drones (a distant second, but second nonetheless) and artillery. Why? The reasons aren't necessarily obvious at first, with so many different types of advanced unmanned drone weapon systems what does a rocket fired out of big clunky truck/tank really do to radically change the strategic balance of land warfare in the region?

The answer to that question is among one of the most pressing lessons that the world, especially Europe must learn. Ukraine already learned it awhile ago, that is why they are always asking for more HIMARS missiles...

To explain why this weapon system is so crucial, I think this recent bit of news actually helps explain it best. The US Army is replacing 14 howitizers stationed on Hawaii for defense with HIMARS weapon systems.

https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2025/7/15/just-in-army-replacing-howitzers-with-himars-in-indopacific-division

Consider the problem as an army (not a navy or air force) detachment charged with defending Hawaii from a possible invasion. Artillery/howitizers are still crucial as they are anywhere else... but their range tops out at maybe 50km with specialized ammunition. Consider the size and scale of the Hawaiian Islands.

The range of a HIMARS system on the otherhand is approaching 500km/300 miles, and you can immediately see how much more useful even a much smaller number of HIMARS systems and ammunition would be for an army detachment defending the Hawaiian island chain than almost any number of traditional howitizer cannons.

It is this scale that the HIMARS system dominates at, and the same logic of choosing a HIMARS system in a situation like the US army faces in constructing a defense of Hawaii applies to a highly contested near peer landwar like Ukraine where the closer you get to the front the more lethal things become.

In otherwords, using HIMARS systems to reach out and strike enemy artillery, radar, anti-air defenses, logistics or other high value targets from the distances HIMARS can fire places the enemy in a situation where all of their forces might as well be stranded on an island with 100km of impossibly fearsome ocean between them and the HIMARS system. You cannot commit your experienced military staff to battle and count on enough of them surviving to continue to effectively fight a war under this kind of consistent, undefendable precision threat.

Traditional tube or cannon artillery is not going anywhere except in unique situations like defending a massive island chain like Hawaii as a ground force, rather the very nature of artillery has been radically changed by the introduction of HIMARS as a new even longer range compliment to shorter range high volume cannon artillery systems. The fact that Russia does not have an effective counter nor even capacity to execute similar strikes at scale makes the likelihood of them making a decisive breakthrough in an offensive this summer remote even with a large advantage in infantry number.

 

If she raises climate change at a party, “at some point someone says, ‘Look, you’re being a bit of a Debbie Downer’ … it was nice to sit in that room with other people, no one was hysterical, no one was over the top, no one was crazy [but] people weren’t going, ‘Oh, calm down. It’ll be fine.’ ”

https://sarahwilson.substack.com/p/table-of-contents

 

Crossposted from https://scribe.disroot.org/post/3715863

A newly established Hungarian company is spending hundreds of thousands of euros on advertisements attacking Hungary’s opposition leader Péter Magyar and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky—far exceeding its reported income and without revealing the source of its funding. Meta eventually removed a wave of similar ads targeting Viktor Orbán’s opponents for violating its terms of service—but only after profiting from displaying them to millions of users.

 

Canada has announced an additional contribution of $14.6 million to support the maintenance and repair of Leopard 2 tanks provided to Ukraine, underscoring Ottawa’s ongoing commitment to Kyiv’s defense against Russian aggression, according to Canadian officials on July 21.

...

The funds will go toward sustaining the Leopard 2 Maintenance and Repair Facility located in Poland, a critical logistics hub for keeping Ukraine’s armored forces operational.

This is very good news for Ukraine, let me state this in blunt terms if "western" foreign military aid is willing to commit to supplying leopards and helping maintain them longterm to Ukraine, that means the whole chain of less heavy weapon systems is also going to be similarly committed since the last thing the weapons manufacturers of the west want is for Russia and its allies to get easy access to the capacity to manufacture similar tanks to Leopards or Abrams (which I am sure they are desperately trying to do at some capacity at a medium term scale), so committing Leopards to war means committing all of the support main battle tanks require to war as well.

Think of main battle tanks as the drill bit on a tunnel boring operation, while the drill bits may be more or less effective over time for tunnel drilling crews, and the technology used may change, what doesn't change is that tunnels still need to be bored and that if you see a big pile of drill bits being gathered you can rest assured somebody is planning on boring some tunnels.

Notice how the movement of a serious amount of main battle tanks and associated logistics to Poland was simultaneous/preceded by a deployment of Apache AH-64 helicopters to Poland. The planned 60 or so helicopters Poland wants will form an immensely terrifying bulwark to Russian attacks either from the air or ground and I think at least the US if not other foreign powers were very hesitant to deploy a large concentration of armor near Russia for fear of it backfiring spectacularly without any less of a defensive assurance.

:

some more thoughts, not necessary to the post..

The future of the main battle tank I believe will actually be benefitted by drones. I think one of the reasons there is such an intense change in winds in military support for Ukraine is that "western" generals and military contractors realize that main battle tanks must be extremely tightly integrated with FPV drones and other associated nimble UAVs and UGVs.

There is simply no talking about armored manuever without talking about drones anymore, which means in terms of raw geopolitical power expression just having a bunch of tanks suddenly doesn't necessarily mean anything. For a whole variety of reasons this makes Ukraine suddenly an extremely important ally to work with because it is Ukraine that in all likelihood will develop the necessary technology but more importantly tactics and doctrine to successfully integrate UAVs and UGVs into core aspects of armored manuever doctrine.

https://kyivindependent.com/ukrainian-assault-brigade-captures-russian-troops-using-only-drones-and-robots-in-historic-operation-military-says-06-2025/

The presence of a single AFV/IFV in the midst of an operation like this would be a massive force multiplier and the risk to the AFV/IFV crew would be minimized. I am not some magic armchair genius, I am sure Ukraine realized the same thing a long time ago.

The tight integration of armor with UAVs and UGVs is vital of course for situational awareness to survive and for the capability of UAVs to intercept enemy FPV drones in a defensive manner, but also because.. well let me put it this way in a fight the best sidekick for an elephant is a rat that can bite at the enemies heels and sneak around gathering intel for the elephant not yet another elephant.

The problem main battle tanks have had since nearly the beginning is that they quickly outrun their supporting infantry and even logistics support after smashing through enemy lines, paradoxically though tanks NEED infantry support, but tanks and infantry are an uneasy duo as the environment tanks demand is highly lethal to infantry not deeply entrenched... and infantry has to be exposed to even remotely keep up with armor... so what can accompany the tanks? No one had an actually good battle tested answer other than armored fighting vehicles/APCs (which still have to ultimately expose human beings to the hellish conditions tanks thrive in) until Ukraine developed a plethora of nimble FPV type drones.

https://cnc.fandom.com/wiki/Battle_drone

I mean, C&C Generals was playing around with the idea in 2003....

I think there is an immense tactical benefit to main battle tank crews having an absurdly agile tiny hovering drone that can dance around the tank providing necessary close range situational awareness while also having the ability to ferret out AT crews/UGVs/UAVs trying to sneak up on the tank or heavily entrenched hiding infantry. I KNOW that if I am even somewhat on the mark about this military experts all around the world have to be chomping at the bit to work with Ukraine on developing tactics, technology and doctrine through their use of unmanned vehicles in combined arms operations with leopards and other main battle tanks.

I know if I was a top military brass in a country that was somewhat aligned with western military powers I would be focused on quickly helping Ukraine win the war and then gaining primary access to Ukraine UAV and UGV crews to train my ground forces with and "against" in Opfor training exercises. The changes in the dynamics of near-peer warfare in this conflict are too major to ignore, unless you are Russia...

As a final aside, notice how the evolution of armor in response to drone threats has been to make larger and heavier armored fighting vehicles. This is happening with Russia's improvised "turtle tanks" but also in armored fighting vehicle design all over the world. Bigger and heavier is the obvious trend (though there are many exceptions). The silhouette profile of armored fighting vehicles keeps increasing, and this isn't even to mention the inherent tradeoffs MRAPs make which are proliferating even into near-peer fullscale landwars in ways they were never designed for as they have absolutely HUGE silhouettes.

MRAPs are an extremely successful family of armored vehicle design, but they are inherently larger than armored vehicles designed to avoid destruction by direct fire rather than IEDs, UAVs, or other ambush tactics/small arms fire.

Do you know what main battle tanks love? Vehicles with HUGE silhouettes. So... logically there is a certain size that armored fighting vehicles will grow to counter drone threats and other new technologies... until their silhouette becomes so large it is catastrophically vulnerable to main battle tanks and TOW missiles. What is that size? I don't know, but there is a size limit that dynamic will occur at and I think Russia is going to figure out the hard way what it is.

To boil this tangent down, I think there is a possibility the ideal conditions for main battle tanks fielded closely with UAVs and UGVs and combined arms support to perform decisively may be developing and Ukraine is clearly far better situated to exploit that both in doctrine and in material access to armor.

Maybe if the Russians learn how to act like a barn with their obsolete tanks they can actually use their high visibility as a bold form of camouflage.... or more likely once Ukraine starts to get more semi-modern tanks fielded on the battlefield these monstrosities will get annihilated from a 1km away by a leopard mbt and drone scout team the crew never saw coming, and the remaining Russian armored vehicles in the wake of the sudden explosion will be too panicked to figure out where the attack came from in time.

By comparison a tank "in defilade" which means the hull of the tank is not physically presented to the enemy, only as much of the turret as necessary is visible over the rise from the target's perspective 1km away.

Anyways, my point is, I think this is a VERY solid indicator Ukraine will not lose this war. The geopolitical military players in the west I don't think would let heavy armor begin to be committed to Ukraine like this if they thought Ukraine had any chance of losing this war (which is shitty of them, not denying that).

view more: ‹ prev next ›