TBF, your previous post reads to me the opposite way, like 'it is not enough of a hate site'. Also I would offer you to look at it as a Venn diagram, if something is a hate site and more, it is still a hate site, just with extra
sukhmel
joined 2 years ago
Yeah, that sounds like a crappy way to promote the product
What's the use for those in corporate env, that's not available outside of it?
Far, but being a programmer is usually not about using assembly anymore
Edit: to elaborate a bit, TIS-100 has an overcomplicated architecture but oversimplified command set, and restricts the coder way more than the real assembly (e.g. you have a limit on line length of 12 chars or somewhat close, and that includes the opcode itself). Imo these design decisions allow it to be interesting and simple enough to comprehend, but severely limits what can be implemented on that architecture in reality without requiring for lots of boilerplate
Let's take a look
Makes sense. But then we're getting the standard that tries to define everything
The alternative would be
More reasonable, if you ask me. At least I came to value modularity in programming, maybe with standards it doesn't work as good, but I don't see why
One can be pro- or anti- any concept or thing, some options just make more sense
Oh, but that's but a ten year long accident, nothing deliberate /s
This may have been sole reason to do that, so of course he did
This reads as if it was an advertisement, colour me suspicious. And that's even though I use JetBrains IDE myself
I'd say that trying to get Rust everywhere is just something that is done in the hope it will help the ecosystem mature faster. It's a bit hard to compete with languages that are 30, 40, or over 50 years old