sudoshakes

joined 2 years ago
[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (6 children)

She knew she had the condition and avoided high caffeine drinks.

She did not know about the caffeine content, 390mg in the large lemonade, due to poor labeling by Panera. This one drink is 10mg less than the maximum daily dose for HEALTHY person according to the FDA.

Given the lack of consuming any other caffeine products regularly due to her knowing about their impact on her heart, it is not a leap to say the lemonade was the culprit.

Further, the lawsuit alleges harm, even if not the sole cause of death, from their product due to not making it clear to the buyer that contents has so much caffeine.

According to coffeechemistry.com, one liquid ounce of espresso can have anywhere between 30 and 50mg of caffeine. That means that a double shot will likely have anywhere between 60 and 100mg.

She bought a lemonade, without caffeine labeling, that contained 8 shots of espresso in caffeine. Cause of death or not, the legal culpability and reasonable expectation that this would not be in its contents is clear as day.

This will never go to trial.

[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

I suppose you have heard of not all broken people are assholes, but all assholes are broken people? Same thing here. All broken vets are not nazis.

You on the other hand have proven yourself a rather clear asshole.

[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com 13 points 2 years ago (6 children)

What’s the difference?

Really?

[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com 57 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Billion with a B.

[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com -4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Reality. <> This Comment.

[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com 2 points 2 years ago

This guy gets it

[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com -5 points 2 years ago

If the only proper response is discontinued existence, then you have left no possible response.

[–] sudoshakes@reddthat.com -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Negotiating with them would give them reason to take hostages again.

Terrorism definition: the unlawful use of violence and intimidation, especially against civilians, in the pursuit of political aims.

So if you reward violence with success to political wins, this would give violence a reason to happen more as a tool. This obviously isn’t an answer if you are Israel wanting to prevent your citizen and other nations being killed / violently victimized to force capitulation of your government.

So from their perspective, or any other government of the world, this is a non starter.

view more: ‹ prev next ›