Do you actually think that's any sort of change of heart for him? He absolutely doesn't regret Iraq. Supporting Ukraine for him is just supporting more arm shipments. It's no problem for him to say "aww gee Iraq was a mistake", after its all done.
Hell, praising Bush for supporting Ukraine did more harm for the cause than good because the average american - even republicans - hate his guts.
The point is to learn who to not to trust to prevent this from happening in the first place. If we didn't keep re-electing people who supported the Iraq war this genocide absolutely would not have happened in the first place.
No amount of shaming them had an affect on them before. Only the prospect of real consequences for their crimes is making them change. All you've done is just found a new way to tell anti-zionist protestors to shut up.
So we should forgive Bush for killing 2 million Iraqi's then because he said it was a mistake? Never trust anyone who supported his war. Everyone's just washing their hands so they can dirty them again.
Just letting AI take the wheel and hitting git commit -am 'Update project files' every few minutes.
The article isn't criticizing any individual specifically. We should all take note of who is just now pivoting on their support for genocide.
We had a similar lesson with the Iraq war. Many politicians and pundits parroted Bush about Saddam's WMDs and then later said it was all a lie. Those same people pandered lies again about 40 beheaded babies and secret Hamas bases under hospitals. Naming and shaming them now isn't the priority but we should not forget who they are unless we believe their lies again.
If only there was a trusted UN organization with decades of experience providing aid to Gaza.
For the record: numerous women have spoke out against Trump for sexual misconduct while underaged. All the named ones are from Miss America or Miss Universe competitions. A couple of Epstein's victims have filed charges against Trump too but those remain anonymous.
Late as usual.
You're either citing some failed new deal policy or various libertarian myths that the government still pays farmers to destroy their crops.
When there is such a supply is too high and the demand is too low, farmers will destroy their own crops instead of taking them to market. This is because the price of the crop is lower than the price of actually taking it to market. This is bad for two reasons:
1 There could still be a real "demand" for the product just not an "economic" demand. IE people don't have the money to pay for the crop such as in the Great Depression or the COVID pandemic.
2 Food is the primary good you want as abundant as possible in any economy at the lowest prices. Other such goods are steel, energy, railway transport, ie goods that other markets depend on. That runs contrary to the interests of the producers of those goods. They want to hit the sweet spot where profit is highest. The two main solutions for this are subsidies or nationalization. For example, China has nationalized steel production and rail transport which they intentionally operate at a loss for the benefit of the rest of the economy.
They currently do need subsidies to be profitable. Farmers destroying their own crops to raise prices is a well documented historical fact and it still happens today particularly when it comes to livestock. This is not my abstract conjecture.
That's cool, but you've forgotten the point. The people who've been supporting genocide all this time should not be forgiven nor should we stop calling them out. They all belong in the Hague like Bush. Telling people to be quiet about them is just another excuse to tell pro-palestian protestors to be quiet when they've been right the whole time.