I didn't say the headline was the best, I said the article discussed the topic at hand and provided examples with how.
The fact that people are ALREADY dying and this would LIMIT their MANDATED breaks, it goes to show this is very much a step in the wrong direction.
That's not even acknowledging the fact that all estimates indicate summers will only get more severe.
Local ordinances mandating water breaks for workers outdoors, passed in Austin in 2010 and in Dallas in 2015, have contributed to a significant decrease in annual heat-related illnesses and heat deaths. Since 2011, annual workplace heat-related illness numbers have dropped by 78 percent, while workplace heat-related deaths have cut in half. San Antonio considered a similar ordinance before the Death Star zapped its chances.
In addition to overturning existing local ordinances, House Bill 2127 bans cities and counties from passing new ones at the risk of legal action. These include any bills concerning agriculture, finance, insurance, labor, natural resources, property, business and commerce, and occupations.
[...] come September 1, those water breaks in Dallas and Austin will no longer be mandatory. Some workers fear that bosses seeking to increase production will eliminate existing breaks.
Trying to understand how this has nothing to do with it?
If it were the latter she could have still enjoyed live performances (assuming those people were good musicians playing in a good venue) but yeah sounds like she just didn't like music. Which, to me, is crazy. When people say they don't really listen to or don't like music, I literally can't even imagine what that's like. There is so much diversity in music, especially now. Playing instruments has been a part of human history for at least 40,000 years and we've been singing as long as we've had vocal cords.
GOTTA GET DOWN ON FRIDAY
I mean really, who isn't looking forward to the weekend, weekend
Community* not sub
You're really missing the point. Nobody would say "the 'goal' per se is decreasing attendance to events like this".
They did exactly what they set out to do. Make a public spectacle that people write news stories on and then the public talks about it. Normalizing discourses of these issues and drawing more attention and support to addressing them.
People who are already of the corporate lapdog mindset that any inconvenience to them about social, political, and environmental issues should just go away won't have their minds changed. But nobody wants to change their minds, they understand these people won't change.
But young people especially will be drawn to support causes and invoke change when they are constantly reminded that their future is being destroyed around them, instead of just buying into distractions and ignoring it all.
Apt username, Problematic Consumer.
Meta is cancer. You don't let cancer grow and see if it ends up maybe causing issues or killing you. You cut every trace of it out as soon as it's detected.
Meta has never done anything to show it is a corporation that acts in good faith. In fact it has proven time and time again it is actively acting in bad faith, against people, community, and privacy interests in order to drive profit with no regard for anything else.
Kill the cancer before it kills you.
Would you consider editing your original post to reflect that :)
Not sure if racoon or dog
So, like, obviously you're a fucking idiot but beside that what are you even talking about? I'm not going to bother reading your unhinged reply, but seriously, it's not like anyone is up in arms about this in the comments or frankly care all that much.
Why was it a concern? There's a valid question, it was an unidentified white powder it could have been something dangerous. Okay there's a reasonable explanation.
But again, nobody really cares. Wow, people use drugs. Gasp. Get a fucking grip. I've found most people who are critical of government leadership using drugs are critical of the hypocrisy, not the drugs themselves, because they understand prohibition is taking away their liberty. Actual liberty, not the kind of hate mongering fascists call liberty.
If people actually cared about something like this happening in China, I'd wager, is because it would be surprising somebody would be brave enough to obtain cocaine and then bring it into a government entity in a totalitarian regime where literally fucking killing you is the punishment for possession.
But again, not gonna read your reply. There's actually an instance for idiots like you, maybe go find lemmygrad so you can be coddled in your safe space with like-minded shitbags instead of bringing your weird shit here.
Introspection is a tough nut for many to swallow.
"until something happens"
I suppose Metas history of actively being a bad actor working against societies best interests and enabling hate groups doesn't qualify as 'something'...