subiprime

joined 4 months ago
[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago

the only person i've ever heard use wicked like that is jerma, so, that's my headcanon for this.

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

petition to make an okbuddyrosalyn community here

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

6 articles?

amateurs...

meanwhile the polish words for "this" and "that":

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

this is gonna be absolute chaos with all those giant 2-person-tall wooden pikes with sharp metal on top all getting dropped into free fall in such a tightly packed formation :3

...worth it

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

i would be sneezing my lungs out from the pollen -w-

thats why i prefer laying in the leafy or frosty grass in the autumn and winter :3

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago

man i hate it when i walk by a nuclear power plant and get hit with crippling amounts of ionizing radiation and my immune system stops working

...they should really figure out some way to like, keep the radiation inside or something...

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

room-temperature is safe mf's when they are doomed to feel an eternal nothing on their skin

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

is that saddam hussein

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

I think this could use a bit more elaboration, since if x-y+y-z < -(|x-y|+|y-z|), then ||x-y|+|y-z|| >= |x-y+y-z| wouldnt be true. This is impossible though since q >= -|q|

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 months ago

I see, thanks! :3

[–] subiprime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I'm confused about this step in the final condition's proof:

|🍎(x) -🍌(x)| +|🍌(x) - 🍇(x)| >=|🍎(x) -🍌(x) +🍌(x) - 🍇(x)| = |🍎(x) - 🍇(x)| since |q| >= q forall q

I can see how it's true by proving that |p| + |q| >= |p + q|, but that's not stated anywhere and I can't figure out how |q| >= q forall q is relevant.

Also, thanks a lot for making/showing a proof :D

view more: next ›