stevecrox

joined 2 years ago
[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (4 children)

We use radiators because every house had a gas line for heating, boiling water and cooking. Radiators were more efficient than gas fires.

Most residential gas boilers are 20-35kwh, air source heat pumps (£4k-£5k) are linked to compression cylinders which provided 11kwh of heating and cost of £9k each, with the need for a water tank, etc... and then installation cost.

Putting air conditioning in still requires the heat pump with a unit (£500-£1k) for each room, plus installation costs.

If you take a 3 bed room house, you are looking at ~£15k for an air source heat pump vs £9k to put air conditioning into every room (it gets worse for air sourced heat pumps the bigger the property).

Once you move to air conditioning for each room you don't need radiators. This means your hot water supply is dishwashers, washing machines, taps, baths and showers.

Dishwashers and washing machines boil their own water (for efficiency).

Taps and showers have electric solutions. The price difference between the two is so great you could buy a hot tub to replace your bath.

Air source heat pumps don't make sense

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

It isn't surprising.

I tried to replace my gas boiler in 2020 (it failed), I reached out to 8 companies to get an estimate for a ground or air sourced heat pump. 5 didn't pickup/return emails. 2 told me they don't do residential.

The last qouted £21k plus installation costs, then told me if I had a gas boiler that would be cheaper to maintain/run.

I have just met someone to qoute for air conditioning, they told me you can use it for heating. The initial estimate is the same as a gas boiler.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Activity Pub has a few parts, Lemmy implements the Threaded message part.

Mastodon implements a short messaging (posts) part. Meta's Threads will implement this.

KBin implemented both parts, within KBin you'll see microblog as an option for magazines (communities/subredits). This shows either 'posts' made to the magazine or posts with hastags associated with the magazine.

The posts and threaded message parts have overlap in how they work so mastodon users can see certain threaded messages and comment on them.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Its worth listening to, he talks about how Ukraine, Russia and the USA aren't part of the cluster munitions ban and then explains how the risk from cluster munitions is similar to the risk of mines (which people don't seem to be objecting to).

I thought the most interesting part was his point that cluster munitions help artillery destroy certain targets in fewer shots (e.g. 1 vs 10) and that wouldn't lead to a decrease in firing but an expansion in the number of targets attacked.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Does this make sense to anyone?

From a design perspective isn't it normal to puck an icon set which has drawn these icons in a specific style. Individually they follow diffent, shape/colour rules so look messy.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I agree but there will be limits on how much additional borrowing and spending markets will be ok with.

It means that spend has to be on the biggest issues and things most likely to help the economy.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That isn't what he said..

He states what he would like to do but sidesteps the question when asked directly what payrise offer he would make. His message is focused on growing the economy.

I think its expectation management, I think he sees his first few years as firefighting and he won't make promises he can't keep.

Labours message on the NHS was focused on rolling back privatisation, then it suddenly stopped and became about bed blocking and staff shortages.

I don't think Starmer suddenly decided privatisation was good, its more bed blocking is eating NHS resources and there is a 30,000 staff shortage.

Those are critical issues which if left will cause the NHS to collapse, so if you know you won't have time to address something like privatisation it makes sense not to promise to remove it.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Github stars is not a good metric, firstly because KBin is hosted on codeberg but mainly because a healthy project has lots of unique contributors and regular updates/enhancements.

KBin has 79 open Pull Requests, while Lemmy has 29. From a visual check PR's seem to be older than 2 weeks. Its hard to say one is "healthier" than the other, without scraping information into a spreadsheet.

Secondly Rust is new and has a lot of hype surrounding it, as a result you get a lot of people using it on random projects.

Languages have strengths and weaknesses and developer ecosystems build on the strengths.

For example if I was writing a web application with a database backend I would choose C#, Java or Node.js because there are loads of libraries, tools and frameworks to make it really easy.

Rust is gaining a lot of adoption by embedded system users (replacing C mostly). Lemmy is the only Rust based web server project I am aware of. Which means the level of work to do anything and to keep it updated falls on the Lemmy devs rather than spread out amongst a larger community.

Everyone loves to insult PHP but it has a niche in webservers and won't disappear anytime soon. KBin effort will thus be spent on KBin.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

There is a standard for sharing tweet style information and for threaded type information between websites.

You have software which implements the tweet standard (Mastodon), the threaded standard (lemmy) and both (KBin).

You'll notice some communities will be community@kbin.social or community@kbin.cafe, etc.. this indicates they are not local to the website your using and those addresses are KBin instances, its just your website has a copy of the information.

KBin is newer than Lemmy, it has a fairly simple responsive design that works well on mobile. Lemmy has a REST api so its easier to build mobile applications, a lot of people seem to expect/need to access websites via mobile applications.

The key difference is Lemmy is developed by Tankies, they think China's genocide of Ughurs is justified and they administer lemmy.ml.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 45 points 2 years ago

Reading the article that isn't the goal.

They are working on controlling access to the wider internet. The goal is to push people off of western services on to ones they control. This is so they can control the information their citizens see

They wouldn't stop Russian bot farms or hacking.

[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Apart from Ubuntu/Fedora (which are Snap/Flatpak heavy), I think you would be OK with any Linux distribution. I have a Intel Atom N270 and 2GiB of RAM happily running Debian Bookworm and KDE (with an SSD) your talking about something with far more power.

For me the considerations are as follows.

RAM

You've listed 4GiB of RAM, looking at my PC now (Debian Bookworm, KDE Desktop, 2 Flatpaks, Steam Store and Firefox ESR running), I am using 4.5GiB of RAM.

  • 2.9GiB of that is Firefox,
  • ~800MiB is Steam of which 550MiB is the Steam Store Web Browser.
  • ~850MiB is the KDE desktop

Moving to XFCE or LXDE would help you reduce the Desktop RAM usage to 400MiB-600MiB, but you'll still keeping hitting memory limits unless you install an addon to limit the number of tabs. Upgrading 8GiB in would resolve this weakness.

I get by on the Netbook limiting it to 3 tabs or steam.

Disk Storage
You've listed 500GiB of HDD Storage, this means you want to avoid any distribution which pushes Snaps/Flatpaks/Immutable OS because the amount of storage they require and loading that from a HDD would be insanely slow.

Similarly I would go for LXDE or KDE desktops, both are based on creating common shared system libraries so your desktop loads one instance of the library into memory and applications use it. As a result such desktops will quickly reach 1GiB of RAM but not increase much further.

Also moving from a HDD to SDD would give noticeable performance gains, the biggest performance bottleneck as far back as Core 2 Duo/Bulldozer CPU's was Disk I/O.

GPU

The biggest issue will be the 710M, I don't think NVidia's Wayland driver covers this era so you'll be stuck on X11. Considering the age of the GPU and the need for the proprietary driver, personally I would aim for Debian or OpenSuse the long release cycles mean you can get it working and it will stay that way.

From a desktop perspective, I would install KDE and if it was slow/tearing I'd switch to Mate desktop.

  • KDE has some GPU effects but is largely CPU drawn, it tends to look nice and work
  • Gnome 3 choses to use the GPU even when its less efficient so if it doesn't work well on KDE it won't on Gnome.
  • Mate is Gnome 2 and works smoothly on pretty much anything.
  • Cinnamon is Gnome 3
  • XFCE is like Mate is just works everywhere, personally I find Mate a more complete desktop.
[–] stevecrox@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I agree being able to filter/block everything from a domain on a per user basis would seem the reasonable middle ground.

Otherwise you'll just end up with constant demands to defederate based on conflicting moral codes.

I don't think growth should be the primary driver behind any instance, it should be about building and supporting the community on the instance.

Lastly I don't think your argument is very persuasive, pick an idiology/group you feel are immoral (nazis, kkk, isis, etc..) and see if your own argument would convince you.

view more: ‹ prev next ›