Is one of them Intrigue in the Bakumatsu?
starman2112
Don't complain. You said the options were 100% carnage, or 75% carnage, and because there's no 0% carnage option, you're happy letting 100% win. What people are trying to explain to you is that you should reduce harm as much as possible, even if you can't reduce it entirely.
I am where the smartest bear meets the dumbest tourist
No, it's neither. They were drawing a similarity between the advice given in the post and the advice given in the video. That is, that it sounds obvious to people who say it, but it's condescending and dismissive and in practice it doesn't really help
This is a more complex question than just "what is your favorite video game," or "what games do you consider works of art?"
If I'm putting a game in a museum, it's because there's something about it that warrants preservation on a greater level than other games. To that end, my candidates are
- Pong (1972)
The first commercially successful video game.
- Tetris (1985)
Arguably the most influential game of all time
- Rollercoaster Tycoon (1999)
Handcrafted in assembly, serves as a lesson both in optimization and harnessing the players' penchant for finding intrinsic value in simplistic game mechanics
Edit: I just realized this comment looks like an infernal machine wrote it. I want to make it clear that I'm a human, with skin and blood and stuff
I can't speak for everyone, but I assume it's the condescending and presumptive "advice." Oh yeah, just try doing that thing you already do, it's worked well for the last 30 years.
I mean I'm not gonna give andrew tate or Jordan "The Lobster" Peterson the time of day, but it sure would be nice if there were more leftwingers acknowledging the difficulty of forming relationships instead of just saying "maybe be nice to women???"
This one was a bad.
How would you know? You thought they were saying homelessness is the same thing as being single lol
this thread was initially about how homelessness is the same thing as being single.
I love this platform dude nowhere else will you find commenters so fundamentally incapable of understanding analogies
some marketing fuck-knuckle (string them all up and ban the teaching of marketing)
Based, I love that this platform doesn't remove morally correct comments like this one
It's not reality that society cares to ridicule an average man who isn't dating anyone
Sure, aside from the well-recieved post we're commenting under saying that single men are unrelaxing and unenjoyable people
Society/women are generally angry and upset with men who are shitty to women and then get mad women reject them.
As they should be, those guys are awful
Why do you think having anxiety entitles him to control others?
I don't, and neither does he
Yes, here on Lemmy, where he doesn't want people to blah blah whatever he said.
"Blah blah whatever he said?" Are you calling this dude a narcissist for having thoughts and feelings and experiences that you can't even summarize?
I have lots of sex
Proud of u
Virgins are not in any way shape or form treated like pedophiles, lol wtf
Yeah it's a good thing I didn't say that. I wonder if I expounded on the point I was making in the comment you apparently didn't read
I'm fine harming men like this and you, they constantly do it to me and have for years - and you did do it to me, so clearly that justification is fair with you.
When??? I don't have a habit of diagnosing other people with mental illnesses or personality disorders
In fact, I am attempting to be helpful with his issue, because I am directly and specifically telling him what the exact issue is that makes him repellant to women and others.
I guess I might start though, this is a wild fucking take. I'm actually helping you by calling you repulsive. Lmao
Strawman.
You literally said that everyone disagreeing with you here was a narcissist
I mean you can literally convince a final boss that his plan is dumb, and he'll back off without a fight
So happy they got rid of all that ugly greenery and replaced it with a nice lively gray