My pleasure. It was a good question, I think I'll even include a note on that in the post when I get home this evening and can edit.
Cheers!
starkzarn
joined 2 years ago
That's a great question!
No, blocking a node -- router or other -- will only block packets originating from that node. All traffic that is forwarded by that node, but originating from others will still be received.
Ultimately, the only place that blocking nodes strategically makes sense is on high utilization routers. If you're just blocking nodes on a client, it's not changing channel or airtime utilization for the rest of the mesh. That said though, if someone is harassing you then a block on a client is still fully worth it. 🙂
Meshcore does address some of the biggest shortfalls of Meshtastic, but I absolutely HATE that they're positioned to either rugpull, or setup a perpetual "freemium" model. It's also not interoperable, so if Meshcore is to work, it needs the numbers like Meshtastic has.
Yeah, so far the most prevalent thing around my area has been "it's a hobby for the sake of being a hobby." No one does anything terribly useful or important with it. I can tell you that I would certainly never rely on it as a form of emergency communication.
It's not about user-led synergy. The personal data market is slurped up by those that already have and are building correlations. Just because a user didn't report anything to their insurer doesn't mean an insurer sure as shit isn't going to want the data if they can link it to the user whatsoever, so long as it will make them more money.
This is hypothetical, of course, but it's the way the market of data brokers works.
You joke, but I guarantee there's a market. Consider health insurance companies that see an opportunity to charge everyone more unless they can prove their good brushing habits via app data.
Options are great, this is what drives the Linux community to come up with great solutions!
That said... Kate is an easy winner for me.
A fatalist take like this doesn't help anyone. Do you lock your doors at night even though you're not be continuously robbed? It's always worth it to try and protect yourself.
What's yours then?! Sounds like something a fed would say...
Also your mother's maiden name and the name of your elementary school.
Love me some graylog
The primary thing is rather than "dumb" flood routing, you can choose the path your message takes to its destination; as a repeater operator you can also choose the path it takes to repeat out. Its a slight compensation to people carelessly placing infrastructure nodes with poor configurations in poor places. Not perfect, but better. Adoption is much, much lower though, and the licensing is not copyleft.