ssfckdt

Doing something political for years and then NOT doing something political is not "politically neutral," you're actively decided to make a politically motivated decision instead of simply continue with existing behavior.

I kind of wonder what Chenoweth, a they/them in a LGBTQ relationship, thinks about Stonewall?

That's because every version of Windows since XP has been kind of dogshit

Oh I have literally thought of this too. Maybe a bit more like Cops or if The Office was a real paper company office... but at a software company. So many fires to put out, so many blockers, so much drama between design / pm / dev / qa / execs, etc. Launch date blockers. Post-release hotfix nightmares. It could work

I'm really torn on that. Because I want media to be unbiased, but I also want media to tell the truth.

Most media will simply report the truth of what other people say is the truth.

I suppose I'd opt for unbias over bias if those were the two options.

We need the actual "it was actually done" versus "the circumstances were created such that it could have been done"

Oh, the doctors would immediately prescribe themselves vicodin.

I would ask her to correlate them with existence of violent movements alongside.

The MLK-Malcolm X dichotomy

In short, the presence of a militant option alongside your nonviolent option is quite useful in compelling the opposition to your side because the other option is the militant one.

Meanwhile you can still get away with most of what you learned in Java 1.4.

I think you'd get better traction out of this if it said quantum mechanics

That's a very good move! To counter, you should follow these three principles:

• Prepare a response move that will prevent a future good move.

• Defend your own pieces and try to attack theirs.

• Don't be too eager to sacrifice pieces in order to make short term gains.

• Be prepared to sacrifice an unimportant piece to make a good gain.

If you want to make a good move, try Rook H8 -> G7.

Dark Crystal vibes