You seen that rock he lifts up every day to get in and outta his house?
Squat lifts, literally everyday, for this mofo.
sp3ctr4l
joined 3 months ago
Do you have a pair of fuzzy dice where one of the sides reads 'chubby bunny'?
Hahaha!
Huh, I tend to feel bad for their mid to lower back in 5 to 10 years.
People ask guys if they're into tits or ass.
My answer has always been the same.
Legs.
Fit legs?
You're not gonna care about how big or small the t or a is or isn't.
Yeah she really doesn't.
In fact, her booba is literally smaller than just the average American woman.
Sweeney's got Ds, which yes, are notablely uncommon for someone of her height and overall fitness level...
But the average American woman has DDs.
Breast size generally correlates pretty well with BMI.
but also:
Beyond all the eugenics/nazi drama... I was just baffled by the shot and line about how they make your butt look good.
No, these pants do not do that, on this person/model, you can see it, it looks like Hank Hill's (almost total lack of) ass.
Sweeney does not have a remarkable badonkadonk, and those pants do nothing to make it look like she does, and I am honestly baffled that the ad attempted to argue otherwise, when the reverse is clearly the case.
also also:
Oh, she's from Spokane, welp, that entirely explains her and her family's politics.
I'm guessing Spokane is currently freaking the fuck out over all the nearby farms losing all their workers, good job!
I wonder how hard they're still trying to break Eastern WA and Eastern OR off and join those counties into 'Greater Idaho', aka 'The Aryan Brotherhoodly Love State'.
... But if you're bored, then you're boring.
The agony and the irony, they're killing me!
Easily triggered?
Yes, you apparently are.
Yeah, dad's point was, more to the point, "if everyone had a bunch of money"
I mean, please refer to my comment that has triggered you to see an explanation as to how a far too lopsided distribution of wealth actually affects a society.
Inflation, price level rises, don't just... happen perfectly evenly across all elements of the economy at exactly the same time, to exactly the same degree.
Broadly speaking, those closest to the recieving end of the proverbial money spigot, well they get to spend or invest that money first, and then the rising price levels slowly trickle down, spread out to other segments of the economy.
Basically, bubbles start to form in usually specific economic/market sectors or segments, and then those effects spread, complexify, compound through the whole system, if not well counteracted by very effective and hands on monetary and fiscal policy.
...
You don't seem to get the idea of variable velocities of money, and how they work in a debt based, fractional reserve monetary system.
It is actually private banks that mechanistically do the vast amount of 'inflation', ie, multiplying of money.
Roughly, ever 1 dollar that gets deposited into a bank becomes 10 dollars, through being loaned out to other people and banks, which are then loaned out again, and again, etc.
But, different sectors of the economy have different multiplying factors, different velocities at which those multiplying factors occur.
You can say, print a fuckton of money and throw it at CDO holding banks to prop them up from going bankrupt.
(Basically the 06-08 GFC)
This is a huge amount of low velocity money, its not moving anywhere, its there to shore up failing assets.
Or, you could print the same amount of money, but distribute it in small amounts directly to the broad populace, who will then basically immediately spend it or deposit it, the velocity and multiplication factor of that money will be much, much greater than the former scenario.
(Roughly, Covid Era Stimulus Checks)
Or or, you can achieve something similar in terms of stimulate the ground level economy by taxing the wealthy and giving to the poor, which in net takes slow, low velocity money, and makes it fast, high velocity, without 'printing' any new money.
...
This is all actually a lot more complicated than you seem to think it is.
I don't know that you are a 'bad guy', but I do know that you are an overconfident and misinformed guy, who is flailing when their innacurate, vague aphorism is actually fully explored.
Sorry you don't like being held to an academic level of rigor and scrutiny?
You missed the 'in my experience' part of my sentence.
Its an anecdote.
That's what 'in my experience' means.
But again, broadly speaking... statistically valid correlations can and do exist between people's sexuality and many, many other aspects of themselves, their lives.
Like you can say oh, sexuality has no impact on who someone is or what they are capable of or what their life will look like... but this just assumes society is totally materially and morally neutral, and it treats all sexualities with statistical invariance, and it also precludes the possibility that to any extent, innate, complex biological differences exist.
You're basically saying sexuality is just an arbitrary choice, that society respects totally, thats the only way you could thoroughly believe that 'sexuality has nothing to do with ... capabilities or intellect.'
(You're also confusing outcomes with capabilities in that particular line, but w/e)
LQBTQ+ people are certainly statistically more likely to:
Experience physical violent crime against them,
Become homeless,
Commit suicide.
The idea that someone's sexuality doesn't have any influence on I guess seemingly unrelated aspects of their lives, their experiences, their outcomes, is just objectively false.
But if we do want to talk about actual data and studies, irt to sexuality and human intelligence, here's a fairly recent meta analysis:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7031189/
Without going into it in too much detail, there do actually seem to be some statistically significant differences between different kinds of intelligence per homo/hetero male/females, and the paper does go into some proposed theories as to the actual biological mechanics of why these differences may exist.
I am not certain that its ... that REITs are running out of money broadly... not quite yet at least...
But I am 99% convinced that basically every private homeowner and small time flipper / 'real estate investor' who just recently took their homes off market, after them already being on market 120 days +...
Yeah I'm pretty sure basically all those people are underwater, not necessarily on the property per se, but their total personal financial outlook is now fucked, from 401ks crashing earlier this year, and just generally way too high debt / debt to income ratios, general cost of living increase from tariffs/deportations.
Hooray HELOCs!
Don't worry, date the rate, marry the house, you can always refinance at a better rate later!
(except when you can't, why did you believe the used ~~car dealer~~ home salesperson?)
These people overextended and refuse to entertain a price point where they'd have to end up getting a real job or selling half their shit.
So, a bunch of them in a few noticably fucked markets actually withdrew their for sale listings... in what I can only describe as a hilariously ineffective, delulu gambit to lower overall supply and thus try to stymie that bit of the fundamentals behind the collapse.
What they evidently do not realizs is thag the actual REITs and other mass property owners... they're just gonna keep dropping prices, they can afford to do that, they have bigger pockets...
So, when Joe Blow former AirBNB landlord tries to list again in 3ish months, oh no! Comps are down by another 5-10%! Who could have predicted this!?
Its wild to see basically the housing market now just broadly act in the dumb money vs smart money vs institutional money dynamics that the stock market does, at such a scale.
So many of these petite bougeois are gonna be having total mental breakdowns that nope, they didn't make the cut, fission mailed, generational wealth not achieved, put the fries in the bag.
I am, among other things, an econometrician.
Fucking with the money is one thing.
Fucking up the concept of what money is... is another thing.
Bravo, I love this kind of 'analogy taken too far' creative writing =D