ELISA (Enabling Linux in Safety Applications) Project announced that Boeing has joined as a Premier member, marking its commitment to Linux and its effective use in safety critical applications. Hosted by the Linux Foundation, ELISA is an open source initiative that aims to create a shared set of tools and processes to help companies build and certify Linux-based safety-critical applications and systems
I imagine this means they're contributing both actively and financially to Linux.
Regarding section 1, won't you still get the conflicts when pushing to remote (or pulling from it)?
Some thinkpads have official support for Ubuntu by the manufacturer (lenovo), which means battery optimizations out of the box, amongst other things. Might be relevant for your laptop.
I now noticed that the post's content differs between instances, sorry about that.
I could be wrong. I'd be happy to be shown wrong. Always room to learn.
Generally when I hear cyber security I think of things like data breaches, vulnerability research, malware analysis, netsec, appsec... Stuff like that.
I'm actually not really sure where I'd have posted. I remember seeing a meta community somewhere, maybe lemmy.world, where you can have discussions about Lemmy. But I'm really not sure.
And just to make it clear, I'm just giving you my honest opinion. Not trying to make you feel bad or anything.
How is is this cyber security related?
And it's not P2P...
Jami is p2p for example. Direct communication between peers.
That's not being pretentious, that's being blunt. I personally as a dev, appreciate that.
If you think the code can be improved you should say that, and exactly why that's the case. When you're mistaken you should be able to take the criticism.
Your mission as a dev is to write the ideal code, and being overly polite can stand in the way of that.
He was probably working with bytes and not individual bits, but yeah. He basically wrote executables directly (to my understanding).
I don't think he does. If you're talking about the third line, there's a space between the dots.
The dot command is equivalent to source (running the script in the context of the current shell).
That makes sense, and yeah I imagine the problem isn't the entertainment system.
I just don't get the the last paragraph. I don't know if using Linux affects their code being OS or not. If they're just running it on top of Linux and not modifying it, it probably won't be a GPL violation to keep it closed.