sobchak

Idk, being in a toxic or abusive relationship isn't healthy or a good time for the abused or the abuser, so I wouldn't call it "success."

Weird, I've been forced to use a Mac for work, never liked it. I prefer Debian or other non-rolling-release distros with long term support, and haven't had a Linux install get messed up in many years (since I used Arch, and something went wrong with my proprietary Nvidia drivers after an update).

CO2 levels are still rising pretty much unabated though. Probably mostly due to The Green Paradox and Jevons Paradox..

I don't think it's just about sex. I'm not even sure incels think that. I think it's more about relationships and someone to share your life with. I know some people seem fine with just friends and casual sex, but I think a lot of people have a need, or strong "want," for a close, deep, intimate relationship. I know I do at least. Even if it was just about sex, sex is pretty much a human need.

Personally, I have severe life-long social anxiety (and depression), so it's always been very hard for me to make friends or meet potential partners. I have worked on my anxiety issue (medication, attempts at self help, though I could never afford therapy), and I am better than before (I used to sometimes get panic attacks just being around large groups of people), but it's still severe enough to hinder me in life in general (and noticeable to people around me).

If doing an overlay network (network on top of the Internet), you probably won't be able to do much better than Tor or i2p.

We confirm the trilemma that an AC [anonymous communication] protocol can only achieve two out of the following three properties: strong anonymity (i.e., anonymity up to a negligible chance), low bandwidth overhead, and low latency overhead.

https://freedom.cs.purdue.edu/projects/trilemma.html

This applies to all types of anonymous networks as well (BT, Wifi, etc).

I think it's close to 1/3 of the US states now.

I think the far-right "manosphere" influencers are a good indication at what it does to mental health. Fascism, and extremist groups in general, seem to thrive on men not getting laid. IDK what the cause of this is though; I suppose more digital, less IRL social entertainment. They drink and do less drugs, which could be a reason too (especially drinking).

Edit: This is a self-reported statistic too. It may just be men are more comfortable reporting that their virgins instead of lying.

It's a tax that proportionally taxes the poor more than the wealthy, and it's not a coincidence that it's happening the same time taxes on the rich are being lowered.

Tariffs could make sense if we had a big manufacturing unemployment problem, but we currently do not. And targeted tariffs can help keep strategic industries in the country, but the 15% tariffs aren't targeted. Some countries are just better at making certain things, whether it's because of the resources they have, or the particular skills their workforce have, so trade, generally, makes sense.

The stupid "trade imbalance" thing Trump goes on about doesn't even take into account all the services US companies sell them (tech, financial, etc), and nothing is being done to stop US companies from offshoring these service jobs (some of these service jobs do have high unemployment and are being heavily offshored right now). Nevermind that trade imbalances means we're receiving more stuff than we're sending them, which is more beneficial to us.

I dunno why you want to keep resources/goods in their country of origin. Only Central and South America can enjoy coffee I guess?

If your beans aren't native to your area, I guess they're bringing balance to your ecosystem.

I'm still not sure if it's Trump "chickening" out, or being "bribed" out, or just doing market manipulation, or just being demented. Probably a mix of all of those.

The Dems will not be able to repeal the tariffs if they only control the House. It currently looks very unlikely they'll control the Senate, and it's just a coin toss right now if they'll even control the house (will probably turn unlikely after Texas redistricts).

I can't stand Wolfe for some reason and I've never seen any type of rigor from him. I read his "Democracy at Work" book, and he came up with the term "worker self-directed enterprises," and kinda presented it as a novel concept when they were pretty much just another name for worker cooperatives. I've always liked Krugman's articles/blog because he does get a little "wonkish" sometimes; I think he's considered "New Keynesian" or something like that. Varoufakis and Reich are cool. Oh, there's a youtuber I recently found, "Garys Economics," which is pretty good (though he's an ex-finance guy, not an economist).