smpl

joined 2 years ago
[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you ironically preserve the utm_source parameter?

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I'm not even buying the premise. Any business can look at its bottomline to see if their advertising works. If they can't, then its not working.

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (7 children)

There's plenty to add from OpenNIC and you get access to some addition TLDs as a bonus ;)

https://servers.opennicproject.org/

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Title | Description | License


         |

                                                  |

Fully Automated! | Tabletop roleplaying game set in a solarpunk future. | CC BY-SA 4.0 TWiT | Technology Podcasts | CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

I use the addon Redirector for rewriting urls to youtube etc. to private alternatives. I guess you can use it to rewrite startpage queries.

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 1 year ago

Unless someone has registered the trademark for those specific purposes you're clear. A trademarks is only valid within a specific field of purpose. Trademarks are there to avoid consumers mistaking one brand for another.

There are a lot of entertaining articles on Techdirt about companies not understanding trademark law.

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I agree and the requirement for an exact placement of attribution is not very friendly to derivate works either. I don't think that section 7 of AGPL allow adding anything other than the exact terms in section 7 and it has a clause that allow removing non-permissive additions to the AGPL, but I've sent an e-mail to FSF asking what their position is. I would be very concerned picking AGPL as a license for my projects, if section 7 allow adding clauses like that. Anyhow the clauses were added in this commit, so anything prior to 7.3.0 is normal AGPL.

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

There is no free and open source version of Only Office. It fakes that it is licensed with AGPL, but they have added the following to the license, which in effect completely forbid you to redistribute it. It can be said to be Source Available.

The interactive user interfaces in modified source and object code versions of ONLYOFFICE must display Appropriate Legal Notices, as required under Section 5 of the GNU AGPL version 3.

Pursuant to Section 7 § 3(b) of the GNU AGPL you must retain the original ONLYOFFICE logo in the upper left corner of the user interface when distributing the software.

Pursuant to Section 7 § 3(e) we decline to grant you any rights under trademark law for use of our trademarks.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ONLYOFFICE/DesktopEditors/master/LICENSE

[–] smpl@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need to use a dmix PCM for you card as output.

If you type aplay -L | grep dmix it'll show you a list of dmix devices. You can set one as the default if you create a file named .asoundrc in your homefolder with the content:

pcm.!default {
  type plug
  slave.pcm "dmix:CARD=Set,DEV=0"
}

You of course replace the value of slave.pcm with your desired card name. I just gave one of mine as an example. The above default configuration also takes care of automatic conversion, via the plug pcm, for different samplerates and formats to the settings the hardware is set up to use. Every program that use ALSA for output will read the above file, but you need to restart a program for changes to take effect.

If you enjoy audio production I'm sure you'll find some good use for Jack, but for audio mixing all you need is to use an ALSA dmix pcm for output.

view more: ‹ prev next ›