Lol, well I can't say I'm surprised your bullishness on the matter persists - although I would argue that A) the current architectural model is a single process running the translation in a user-scoped session, and B) given that a bot literally can't recognise anything, any such implementation would be entirely conventional engineering, not waves hands AI voodoo magic. So I don't share your stance. But also I genuinely don't care, so that's as much attention as I'm prepared to give this particular thought experiment.
silasmariner
joined 2 years ago
Their marriage was impossible call it a reference, there was no special love between husband and wife. But also the most he was not terrible in the world either.
Help, call a strokulance, I'm having an amb
For shared notes taking in a controlled environment - yes. It transparently happens anyway. For dynamic environments hosted by a separate service it's a whole other can of worms. You now seem to be fairly clear you're talking about the former, largely doable and indeed mostly implemented case. Nothing interesting left to talk about then.
I can absolutely see a single provider of collaborative online meetings spaces offering a 'notes' bot to the chat as a whole if they don't already do so, since that's already a thing. I see absolutely no reason why they should invest time in rearchitecting the conceptual boundaries of how private a user's interaction with an AI is. I think you've missed some of the implications of collapsing the multiple to a single whilst retaining the illusion that it is a private space
I have strong doubts about this happening in the not-too-distant future just from bots 'seeing' each other in the call. Too many variables (different platforms, different times joining the call, different default languages, different preferences on how notes should be taken). This is why many platforms offer an option to use a single canonical transcription bot - this sort of thing isn't quite as easy as you seem to imagine.
Ok that's incredible. I'm gonna get so lost now I've changed that setting. Magnificent
That's Microsoft activation key isn't it
My brother an I came up with 'Gemmell theory' which breaks down all his characters by archetype. Female archer, strong willed, 'manly' in some regards, yet sexy. Warrior. Has seen some shit, probably had a deal with a demon and/or has a destiny. Bard. Light comic relief. Probably a mate of the warrior. May know a little light magic. You get the idea. I think there are only about 5 archetypes in Gemmell theory.
Whoda thunk that evangelicals be the most evangelical? Wild.
Ha ha I only ever put it on silent when I'm playing music on a Bluetooth speaker so that incoming alerts don't disrupt the music.
I literally never remember to turn it off silent.
I mean it's pretty graphic when he compares her ring to a football pump before going into licking it, but it's also hilarious
Might be that. Although your body goes into absolute overdrive during pregnancy, and it's not beyond the realms of possibility that some of the immune system reactions that kick in manage to eject some level of plastic microparticulates