self

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] self@awful.systems 6 points 2 years ago

addendum to what my co-admin said: don’t come back later, these posts are so fucking terrible I don’t want them in my database

[–] self@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago

Edit: Thanks for the dislikes. Negativity is way better than sharing arguments!!!111

yeah you’re annoying as fuck and we don’t need your posts

[–] self@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago

I don’t think they took a look around when they posted that, and after they did we got the generic shitpost edit

[–] self@awful.systems 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“(Redditors always glom on to the absolute worst things)”

is a redditor on a sub in support of a bubble technology that runs on plagiarism, exploitation of highly vulnerable workers, and infrastructure that causes climate change, and also the sub is a Nazi bar

the aristocrats!

[–] self@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

thanks for your input, PenisDuckCuck9001

[–] self@awful.systems 15 points 2 years ago

This person has been on Reddit for two years, and Reddit hasn’t taken them down. If you feel they are a Nazi or violating laws or rules, report them to Reddit. Otherwise what you are now asking the Mods to do is be the Reddit police. That won’t happen.

If users, no matter what their Reddit profile, repeatedly break rules of this Sub, they will be banned. If they don’t, they won’t.

What users post outside of this sub is not our concern.

holy fuck, there’s so much wrong

[–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

the org structures that brought you Teams Doing Standup Poker

which must be destroyed. find me who’s responsible for this (it’s the Google OKR people, isn’t it?)

[–] self@awful.systems 16 points 2 years ago

DefendingAIArt is a subreddit run by mod “Trippy-Worlds,” who also runs the debate sister subreddit AIWars. Some poking around made clear that AIWars is perfectly fine with having overt Nazis around, for example a guy with heil hitler in his name who accuses others of lying because they are “spiritually jewish.”. So we’re off to a great start.

loves generative AI, encourages debate, fine with having nazis around the place. it’s like someone saw our instance and wanted to make the exact opposite of it, and the predictable disaster that resulted from that decision only really succeeds at making the AI fans look even worse

[–] self@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago (2 children)

what do you mean you don’t want a search engine but much less efficient and much, much worse? you don’t like progress?

[–] self@awful.systems 5 points 2 years ago

edit: lol i was open to learning but nvm i guess

and this is where your bullshit became bannable

[–] self@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago

i don’t understand, what’s stopping you from just not stepping in the broken glass I left on the floor? am i missing something?

[–] self@awful.systems 10 points 2 years ago

yep! and the important thing to understand about proton is, the end to end encryption (where one end is the sender of a message and the other is the receiver — Proton never handles plaintext at all, beyond a tiny and clearly called out amount of metadata stored as plaintext on their servers for stuff like Calendars) is the whole point of the thing, there’s no reason to use Proton without it. with this LLM garbage, Proton’s threat model has shifted such that you can’t trust that the other end’s plaintext didn’t get transmitted to Proton’s servers (there’s no way for you, the receiver, to tell that the sender didn’t use the cloud LLM features), which makes Proton a lot less useful for some of the most vulnerable people who use it, such as activists and journalists who might be under legal threat. this plaintext leak allows some of the messages you’ve received to be subpoenaed, and it’s very easy for that to be used in a criminal case against you.

also, Proton’s published security model for their LLM feature (which is ultra-thin and resembles a PR puff piece more than any other model they published before this) states that their no-log policy is what makes the cloud version of the LLM secure, but their no-log policy has gigantic holes in it, and Proton’s response to these concerns is utterly unbefitting of a privacy/security software company

view more: ‹ prev next ›