self

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] self@awful.systems 7 points 2 years ago

fucking hell how are Musk’s Banks takes even worse than I remember? that was the point where I realized I hated the fucker so you’d think there’d be nothing left to feel rage over but no, Musk corpsefucking Iain’s memory once he was too dead to tell Musk to go fuck himself is absolutely doing it

[–] self@awful.systems 19 points 2 years ago (1 children)

actually speaking of fascism, I took a quick look at our guest’s post history:

  • African countries and IQ
  • COVID conspiracy theories
  • constant right-wing conspiracies in general really
  • fucking links to voat and zerohedge
  • there’s more but I tapped out early
[–] self@awful.systems 9 points 2 years ago

JSON has its issues but at least it’s only the worst of some worlds. Want to make JSON unparsable anyway, for a laugh? Try YAML, the serialization format recommended by four out of five Nordic countries!

fucking

this take is so dangerously real I’m pretty sure uttering it at work will earn you a PIP and a fistfight in the parking lot with the lead data architect

you know, normal startup shit

[–] self@awful.systems 8 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I’ve always seen XML as much more of a tech executive thing — here’s the language that’ll run your entire business but is also incredibly easy to create proprietary semantics with, ensuring you can’t be ousted without taking the company down with you! it looks like absolute shit and it’s painful to type! buy in now!

[–] self@awful.systems 22 points 2 years ago (2 children)

it’s not shocking because we’ve seen worse, but it is remarkable how fascist the implications of this “most people don’t possess cognition” idea are

it’s also very funny how many of these presumed cognition-havers have come to this thread and our instance in general with effectively the same lazy, shitty, thoughtless take on the nature of humanity

[–] self@awful.systems 14 points 2 years ago (6 children)

so uh, they keep self-fellating on Twitter about how they invented their own CAD program over the objections of the haters

here it is, it’s an extremely thin wrapper around the typescript version of manifold with live reloading on changes. note that not only is manifold already a CAD library, they already have a web-based editor that reloads the model on code changes, and kache’s live reloading is just nodemon. the server part looks like it’s barely modified from a code example. the renderer is just three.js grabbed from a CDN.

it’s so weird they didn’t take the necessary 2 weeks to learn how to write the CAD parts of the CAD system they made!

[–] self@awful.systems 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (22 children)

I almost want to go Twitter diving to see if kache has the requisite unhinged rant about how universities are only making quantum physics hard to get money/because of woke or whatever

e: holy shit I already regret this

[–] self@awful.systems 11 points 2 years ago

the absolute worst type of coworker from my cubicle days: heard about a technology at a conference, decided they invented it

[–] self@awful.systems 15 points 2 years ago (1 children)

see I was just gonna go for “promptfondlin” but I’m glad I hesitated cause this is my new favorite ban reason

[–] self@awful.systems 16 points 2 years ago

I wonder if any of the people about to downvote your comments are the weird non-sapient humans who work exactly like LLMs you seem to think exist, or maybe your posts are just inane promptfondling horseshit we’ve seen before

[–] self@awful.systems 17 points 2 years ago (3 children)

tell me more about the AI haters who work in AI research at Apple

[–] self@awful.systems 19 points 2 years ago (9 children)

the raw, mediocre teenage energy of assuming you can pick up any subject in 2 weeks because you’ve never engaged with a subject more complex than playing a video game and you self-rate your skill level as far higher than it actually is (and the sad part is, the person posting this probably isn’t a teenager, they just never grew out of their own bullshit)

given how oddly specific “application auth protocol” is, bets on this person doing at best minor contributions to someone else’s OAuth library they insist on using everywhere? and when they’re asked to use a more appropriate auth implementation for the situation or to work on something deeper than the surface-level API, their knowledge immediately ends

view more: ‹ prev next ›