I'm very curious about what content in a Judy Blume book met the “pornographic or indecent material" burden mentioned in the article.
Other states hoping to finally be able to become a completely Christian-run entity will be taking notes.
schwim
joined 1 year ago
Can I ask why you can't let them talk their nonsense? I know you don't think you can change them so if you choose to hang out with them, why can't you just let them be them? I'm not telling you that you should hang out with them, just that joining in on their discussion is a zero sum game.
I chose not to interact with family any longer and haven't spoken to any of them in years. Not out of anger or spite but simply because none of us were getting anything positive from the relationship.
The senators were not the ones that exposed anything.
Well, I guess if you believe in a space daddy that helps your football team to win and blesses your cheeseburger, you'll believe anything.
The John Doe profiles were set up in April as generic 24-year-old males
Does the fact that they only used dummy male accounts and didn't bother to find out what women are subjected to represent the authors' own misogyny? Perhaps The Guardian should look at cleaning it's own house up before finding dirt on others'.
You've discovered the power of a niche social platform. I single-handedly provided content for a classic car community for over one year before realizing that it was less of a community and more of a blog. If it's not political or technical, a lemmy community will most likely die when the single provider gets tired of the wall of silence.
I understand your goal now. Unfortunately, I'm unable to help, hopefully someone on the community knows the answer and can help. Very best of luck!
As a result I have to disable RFP for my site (or just be annoyed all the time), and I guess I’ll have to advise my users to do the same.
Is there any reason you ~can't~ change your keybinds to something other than CTRL+combo? You explained it's to keep from interfering with other common binds but there's still a ton available to you when taking those into account.
It's your hill to die on but I wouldn't make my website usability dependent on a browser that is so rarely seen.
I clicked the link and saw the book "Justified deadly force and the myth of systemic racism" and immediately knew the type of person we're discussing. I totally understand your point on the matter better.
Do you mean them just firing him and nothing else? Perhaps legal action is coming after. I know better than to count on it but I have seen it before and it always trails a bit behind the administrative punitive action.
This doesn't seem political in nature. Just a shitbag that got caught on camera.
I read the synopsis of the book(thanks for the link). I can see where a book like this wouldn't be appropriate for a 10yo but an entire school system ban seems an overreach.
It would be nice to ensure that as a parent, I was the one introducing topics to my child but having raised her already, I realize that unless I kept her at home her entire childhood, that's a pipe dream. I would have been ok with that book being at her school and if she had read it, she most likely would have talked to me about it as we had many candid conversations on sexuality, relationships and other topics that she came to be aware of via the internet, media or friends.