sbv

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 30 points 1 day ago

Hell yeah! Gimme some of that sweet corner store action!

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I like the statue/monument idea.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

As much as I like the current behaviour, it would be nice if there was a way to turn off "hide read" - I didn't realize refreshing would do that.

An explicit toggle on the button would work for me.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

entitled, if you ask me

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 days ago

It happens sometimes. I really hope some non-terrible corps bid on it and get a profitable wind industry moving in the East.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

What business wouldn't want the government to come in and protect their existing business lines? I completely understand where they're coming from. However, it's our elected official's job to say "no, fuck you" so the business can adapt. Perhaps building something cheaper and more attractive to residents.

Previously our governments have offered low interest loans for decent affordable and attainable housing. I'd be fine with them doing something similar in this case, but not for shoeboxes in the sky.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago

Yeah, I'm mostly joking with the comment. It is frustrating to try and format a good post only to get downvotes from people who don't like downvotes without comments. But it's positive once more and there are a couple of comments, so I feel better.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Is it more than just Toronto? I hadn't heard of other cities turning the cash down or reneging on the deal.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Is this getting downvoted because c/canada doesn't like what the developers are asking for? Or is it something else?

 

This seems to focus on condo builds, which are often sold to investors and speculators. The article mentions that builders can pivot to rentals. It also mentions builders need financing, which should be available from our new housing-friendly CMHC ~~replacement~~ flanker, right?

Trolling aside, it'll be interesting to see how the various levels of government react. Commentators have been saying that prices in Vancouver are pushed by foreign investment (and a hint of money laundering), so this shouldn't be a surprise.

Major players in B.C.’s housing industry are calling on federal and provincial governments to loosen restrictions on foreign investment in Canadian homes to avoid a crash they say will deepen the country’s housing crisis.

...

The letter, signed by companies such as Beedie Living, Westbank, Amacon, Cressey and Polygon, argues that having some level of foreign investment to provide the capital for the early stages of condo projects is key.

“New condo development requires presales to meet financing thresholds, part of which relies on investor-focused buyers. Closer to occupancy, sales typically shift more toward owner-occupiers.

...

But Hani Lammam, executive vice-president at the long-time Vancouver building company Cressey Development Group, said residential construction in major cities in Canada can’t function without the ability to get capital from somewhere besides Canadian citizens, companies or pension funds.

...

The downturn is worse than what the industry experienced in 2008 during the global financial crisis, when construction activity plummeted. Several developers turned to rental at that point and presale condo projects slowed down briefly but recovered within a year, in part because of the foreign capital that was still pouring into the city.

...

Although foreign investors represent a small proportion of Canadian homeowners – Statistics Canada estimates have pegged it at between 2 per cent and 6 per cent – they can have an outsize impact when all their investing is done in a few targeted neighbourhoods.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-developers-mark-carney-david-eby-foreign-investment-housing-supply/

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The fed's press release seems to contain similar info to the paywalled article.

Seems like good news.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

when I look at everyone around me not really giving a shit. ... I really worked hard to reduce my footprint

For years I did this. Didn't drive. Rarely flew. Mostly vegetarian. Bought mostly second hand stuff. It was a lot of work. It had no appreciable effect on climate change, and made my life harder.

I think the place to concentrate effort is on policy change. Acid rain wasn't solved (in North America) by buying patterns, it was solved through legislation. CFCs were phased out through lobbying.

There's definitely a time and place for personal action, but there are so many people that appreciable changes will only come through changing regulations.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/48790317

 

Official rules for sneaking, rather than fighting, through a net architecture are now available for Cyberpunk RED. They are straightforward: a contested Interface check between the netrunner and daemons/dwellers in the arch:

To establish stealth in a NET Architecture, you have to spend an additional NET Action when you Jack In. When you do, you roll a contested Interface Check (Interface + 1d10 vs Interface + 1d10) against all Watchers (Demons, enemy Netrunners … and other entities with an Interface Rank) currently in the Architecture. If you beat them all, you successfully establish stealth and enter the system undetected.

Once the netrunner is in, they need to make a similar check against any Black Ice they encounter:

When a Netrunner encounters a Black ICE while in stealth, they roll Interface + any bonus to Cloak Checks + 1d10 vs the Black ICE’s Perception + 1d10 instead of performing a Speed Check.

Once the netrunner fails the perception check, they are no longer sneaking and normal rules apply.

I'm glad there are more options for netrunners now. I hope RTal adds more options in future.

 

A spectre is haunting Canadian roads: the real prospect of actually having to pay a fine for not respecting the speed limit. As speed cameras proliferate, particularly in Ontario, some drivers are showing their displeasure. Many of the cameras have been vandalized and one in Toronto cut down six times.

It’s time for a deep breath.

Speed cameras shouldn’t disappear, they should multiply. The cameras are effective and, because their penalty is so easily avoided, they are fair.

...

In fact, a recent poll for CAA showed majority support among Ontarians for the cameras. Politicians who pander to the minority of drivers who hate them are gambling with public safety.

Those politicians span the ideological spectrum, from Ontario’s Progressive Conservative Premier Doug Ford to former Ontario Liberal leader Steven Del Duca, now mayor of suburban Vaughan, and left-leaning Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow.

So busy trying to placate drivers, these politicians ignore that speed cameras work. The hit in the wallet is sufficiently unpleasant that it convinces people to slow down. For evidence, consider that the number of tickets issued by any given camera typically goes down over time.

That effect has been further demonstrated by research from a hospital and university in Toronto. According to their findings, referenced in a recent city staff report, the proportion of vehicles speeding went down 45 per cent after cameras were installed near schools and in high-collision areas.

...

A person hit by a vehicle travelling at 30 kilometres an hour has a 90-per-cent chance of surviving. Increase the speed to 40 kilometres an hour, though, and the survival rate drops to 60 per cent. A person hit at 50 kilometres an hour has only a 20-per-cent chance of living.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-sorry-speed-cameras-arent-the-problem/

 

As first reported by CBC Hamilton in 2023, and according to subsequent LSO investigations, Bruyn has a pattern of promising to help clients successfully navigate Canada's complicated refugee process, but then failed to complete their applications, show up for hearings or submit evidence, and in some cases lied about it.

...

In two other cases, clients paid her a total of $10,500 in fees without completing any work and Bruyn never provided refunds, LSO lawyer Kristin Bailey said at the hearing.

...

Bruyn didn't submit any evidence on behalf of her client, even after the Refugee Protection Division gave her an extension, said the LSO. As a result, the woman's refugee claim was denied. Bruyn told her she'd file an appeal, but never did.

The woman was almost deported back to Mexico, but a new lawyer, retained through a local refugee organization, intervened and helped her get a temporary resident permit, said Ushirode's affidavit. She's currently applying for more permanent status.

What's she doing now? Surely she isn't in a position to harm others:

She told the panel she isn't opposing her licence being suspended. She's no longer practising law and was appointed as an adjudicator to Ontario's Landlord and Tenant Board last year, but is on a leave of absence.

 

The Globe has a great editorial on immigration and infrastructure:

a “hard rule” in which population intake does not exceed the growth in the housing stock, the job market and the availability of doctors.

There is merit to that approach, although the emphasis should be on using permanent residency as a tool to ease shortages of specific skills, such as doctors.

Housing advocates (like Mike Moffat) have been calling for that kind of linkage for years. The bad news? It's Poilievre that's suggesting it. Here's hoping Lemmy and Canadian politicians can take the idea and run with it, despite the current advocate.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/editorials/article-right-fix-for-immigration-pierre-poilievre-ottawa/

 

The article has a loooooong list of rent decreases in major metros across the country. Generally, we're seeing decreases that seem to erase the increase from the same period in 2024.

Over the past year, the average asking monthly rent fell between 2 per cent and 8 per cent in condos and rental-only apartments – also known as purpose-built rentals – said the report released Tuesday by Canada Mortgage and Housing Corp (CMHC).

The drop was due to a surge in new condos and apartment buildings hitting the market along with limits on temporary foreign residents such as students and new permanent residents.

...

“It is quite evident on the demand side that there have been signs of weakening,” said Tania Bourassa-Ochoa, CMHC’s deputy chief economist, adding that there were stronger rental declines in regions with slower population growth.

https://archive.is/wosmf

 

The housing crisis is screwing generations of Canadians. Toronto City council is enabling it.

The feds need to call out Toronto's bad faith negotiations and withdraw the promised funds.

(The feds also need to change tax laws to definancialize housing, enforce money laundering laws, build affordable housing, etc - but I digress)

In 2023, Toronto city council voted in support of an agreement signed with Ottawa, pledging a variety of policy changes that included allowing buildings with six housing units on a single lot anywhere in the city. Federal money allocated from the Housing Accelerator Fund started to flow in return and then, during a debate last month, a lot of councillors got cold feet.

Instead of voting to allow the sixplexes they had pledged to permit everywhere, council watered down the proposal. In fact, they took a fire hose to it. These buildings will be allowed in only nine wards, which together make up less than one-quarter of the city’s area. Councillors for the other 16 wards can opt in later, as if they are mayors of their own area.

https://archive.is/DoPVJ

 

Federal cabinet ministers are being asked to find ... ways to reduce program spending by 7.5 per cent in the fiscal year that begins April 1, 2026, followed by 10 per cent in savings the next year and 15 per cent in the 2028-29 fiscal year.

I'm getting 90s vibes. Government cutbacks, threats of separation, climate change. It's all here.

But there's a modern twist: we're talking about 3C change in 2100, there's a housing crisis, our media landscape is dominated by tech bros, and the US is lost in the culture wars.

archive

 

"At that time, I was pregnant with my first kid," she said. "I lived in a two-room apartment … it was an OK building, but it was small for us."

[She] went to an online portal, entered her income and requirements, and was ranked alongside thousands of other residents. Soon, she was assigned a new apartment: a three-bedroom unit in a brand-new building, adjacent to Vienna's Central Station.

"I love it. It's in the middle of Vienna," she said. "A lot of young families moved in at the same time…. There's a big campus here, with a kindergarten and primary school. There's dancing classes, and a boulder bar, and a huge park."

[She] wasn't desperate to find housing. She and her partner earned middle-class incomes. But in recent years, Vienna has become renowned among housing experts for its model of social housing, which provides heavily subsidized rental units to more than half of the city's two million residents.

The key is taking profit out of construction (at least 96.5%), and a robust government that isn't afraid to impinge on the private sector.

I would love to see something like this in Canada, but I don't think our politicians (or electorate) have the guts.

 

Here's my theory: Carney dropped the DST because of supply management on dairy. My evidence is sparse, but:

Last month, the U.S. and Britain announced a trade deal related to a range of products. But Britain’s 2-per-cent DST was not affected.

(From the Globe)

That shows other countries have a DST but that hasn't been a sticking point in trade negotiations.

Meanwhile, Quebec really likes supply management:

83 per cent of Quebecers want governments to do everything in their power to protect the country’s supply management system.

During the next election, Carney will probably need Quebec's support to stay in power. By giving up the DST, Carney may be able to keep supply management for dairy, and avoid alienating Quebec voters.

I guess we'll see during the final negotiations. Do our dairy farmers get to keep their protections?

 

Fifty-two per cent of us worry a lot about our personal finances. Fifty per cent feel frustrated, 47 per cent feel emotionally drained and 43 per cent feel depressed. There is not one survey indicator to suggest Canadians have made financial progress in 2025 compared with 2024.

...

Our debt-to-household disposable income has bumped up against nearly 200 per cent for years now, putting Canada in first place among G7 countries. Canada’s is 185 per cent; the average for all G7 countries is 125 per cent according to Statistics Canada. Canadian households collectively owe about $3-trillion, almost three-quarters of it is mortgage debt.

...

Today’s Canadian dream is to make the next mortgage payment without having to borrow it. The housing crisis hasn’t just hobbled the hopes of many Canadians seeking affordable housing; it is undercutting middle-class living standards.

...

That thinking of retirement provokes anxiety in surveys on the matter shouldn’t be surprising. It is one more item on a growing list of aspirations many Canadians cannot afford.

view more: next ›