I don’t love the title but it’s the best I could come up with to fit within the 80 character limit.
A half dozen people might still be reading hackernews on punchcards so they ha-
ve no choice but to argue about how to shorten "long" titles every day.
Lol talk about mixed messages.
[Firefox] will evolve into a modern AI browser
Firefox's social media account today:
Firefox is not becoming an AI browser.
It's most obvious on the cat which is all around nightmare material.
The image also comes with alt text:
a bizarre collection of ai-generated illustrations including a sign that reads wood of of year and a chyron that reads breaking news
It certainly comes across a little different when said by someone who thinks cisgender is a slur and that changing one's sex is some sort of great moral evil.
Turning into a butterfly is a cool sci-fi future but those trans people are a bridge too far.
Also like it's just hard to listen to, being drug hazed ramblings-- I want some actually fun sci-fi speeches!
This is old news but I just stumbled across this fawning 2020 Elon Musk interview / award ceremony on the social medias and had to share it: https://www.youtube.com/live/AF2HXId2Xhg?t=2109
In it Musk claims synthetic mRNA (and/or DNA) will be able to do anything and it is like a computer program, and that stopping aging probably wouldn't be too crazy. And that you could turn someone into a freakin' butterfly if you want to with the right DNA sequence.
It's very meta for Yud to write a story all about how the story isn't all about himself.
I was vaguely aware of the calibre vulnerabilities but this is the first I've actually read the thread and it's wild.
There were like 11 or so Proof of Concept exploits over the course of that bug? And he was just kicking and screaming the whole time about how fine his mount-stuff-anywhere-as-root (!!?) code was.
I'm always fascinated when people are so close to getting something-- like in that first paragraph you quoted. In any normal software project you could just put that paragraph as the bug report and the owners would take is seriously rather than use it as an excuse for why their software has to be insecure.
It's even way too long a read and full of footnotes, as is tradition!
Heck it's even long enough that I just came across the second flashcard break, and I'm 1/4th of the way through part 1...
Dang that judge was angry.
Here's docket #170: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.mied.384571/gov.uscourts.mied.384571.170.0.pdf -- the complaining about not being allowed to use AI is on page 14 and 16 (it's pretty awful reading I almost gave up before reaching that point)
a pro se litigant should not be threatened with per-citation fines before any violation.
lmao
The documentation for "Turbo mode" for Google Antigravity:
Turbo: Always auto-execute terminal commands (except those in a configurable Deny list)
No warning. No paragraph telling the user why it might be a good idea. No discussion on the long history of malformed scripts leading to data loss. No discussion on the risk for injection attacks. It's not even named similarly to dangerous modes in other software (like "force" or "yolo" or "danger")
Just a cool marketing name that makes users want to turn it on. Heck if I'm using some software and I see any button called "turbo" I'm pressing that.
It's hard not to give the user a hard time when they write:
Bro, I didn’t know I needed a seatbelt for AI.
But really they're up against a big corporation that wants to make LLMs seem amazing and safe and autonomous. One hand feeds the user the message that LLMs will do all their work for them. While the other hand tells the user "well in our small print somewhere we used the phrase 'Gemini can make mistakes' so why did you enable turbo mode??"
ModRetro, retro gaming company infamous for being helmed by terrible person Palmer Luckey, has put out a version of their handheld made with "the same magnesium aluminum alloy as Anduril’s attack drones" (bluesky commentary, the linked news article is basically an ad and way too forgiving).
So uhh... they're not beating those guilt by association accusations any time soon.