rudyharrelson

Cause I was thinking of characters who use guns, which isn't really Batman's vibe (aside from his very early years)

It's certainly a personal preference, but I'll give some insight as a casual Punisher fan:

A character doesn't need superpowers to be interesting. People can enjoy the Punisher despite him being "just a guy who shoots people with a gun" in the same way people enjoy "John Wick", Judge Dredd, "Taken", Jason Bourne, "Die Hard", or any movie starring Arnold Schwarzenegger. The archetypal "one man army with nothing left to lose" story is cliched and perhaps "basic", but can also be written in a compelling way depending on the author. Lots of different authors have written for The Punisher over the years, some being better than others.

I personally think a fun aspect of the character is his understanding that he isn't a good guy; he (in most continuities I've read) hates what he has become and only does it because it's all he knows. He doesn't characterize it as "justice", either. He does what he does as a means of punishment, vengeance, and retribution (and considers it a preventative measure when the criminal is irredeemably evil).

Some of his better stories explore the consequences of this judge-jury-and-executioner approach he takes. For example, killing an undercover cop who had infiltrated a gang that was on Punisher's hit-list. In that particular instance, he was willing to let the undercover cop's widow execute him as penance for his mistake. The widow lets him live because she doesn't want to be like him.

I guess I'd probably pick "money" because I am generally risk-averse. I might already have incredible luck, but I don't gamble, so how would I know? I've been incredibly lucky in non-gambling endeavours (my health, my family, my career, etc), but if asked to pick between being stochastically lucky and being guaranteed a certain level of comfort (and thus being able to provide for my family) for the rest of my life, I'm gonna pick the latter.

Hm, I'm not seeing any of those games as part of this package. Am I missing something?

The version of this meme that I originally saw had Intel as a tortoise that crossed the finish line after Nvidia burst into flames.

The dog on the left is such a strawman lol. Those who would say such a thing are few and far between. I know plenty of DMs and players who think the PCs' combat encounters should be challenging and even lethal.

It is extremely common for classes to require students to learn to use proprietary software. It’s a tool of the trade.

I understand that; my position is more ideological than practical. In an ideal scenario, AutoDesk, Adobe, Microsoft, etc wouldn't be so deeply entrenched in their respective fields such that they are the de-facto tools of the trade for every business which must be learned in order to be hired. I know a given student has to learn certain proprietary tools in the current academic and professional environment. My comment was saying I would prefer this not to be the case. I am fully aware that proprietary software domination in the academic and professional spaces is not going away any time soon.

In my ideal scenario, an interviewer at a company would ask, "Can you perform the following edits to a given graphic?" instead of "Can you use Photoshop?" since the former allows for candidates who can use alternatives like GIMP. I understand company pipelines aren't set up for this, either, because company pipelines are also deeply entrenched in proprietary software.

The OP's photo is specifically about professors allowing other software to be used. Which would be a good starting point for making these kinds of changes.

I'm no academic, but it seems wrong to me that any field would require the use of a particular proprietary software in order to do one's homework assignments.

May Excel or SPSS be the best tool for the job? In many cases, sure! But students should be allowed to use whatever other software can also get the job done, as long as the software exports the assignment in a data format that the professor can reasonably ingest (e.g.: turning in a CSV file, which can be understood by many different kinds of software, not just Excel).

I understand professors have limited time to check homework and thus don't want to spend time learning how to do anything but open a single, specific filetype, but that's besides the point.

Median household income, adjusted for inflation, is up ~25% (despite the narrative).

What's the ratio of household income to the cost of living? I understand that's going to vary wildly from place to place, but my point is income, as a statistic, seems meaningless without knowing the cost of living to see if people are actually able to afford rent, groceries, etc on that 25% increased income.

Came here to say something similar. I always have mixed feelings on Scrubs for similar reasons to you. I genuinely can't go back and rewatch most episodes because they are incredibly dated or insensitive in many respects. The good parts are still good, the great parts are still great, but the bad parts feel really bad IMO, and it really kills a lot of rewatch potential for me, despite having loved watching seasons 1-5 when it was originally airing. It was one of my favorite shows for years.

I can definitely watch older stuff and understand it's a product of its time, but Scrubs in particular has me cringing by 5 minutes into the episode; I can't get through the rest of the episode most of the time. I end up skipping around to watch the scenes I know I like. I ain't got time to sit around watchin' The Todd harass people or Kelso make his usual "wife bad" jokes.

What a soundtrack, though. One of the better soundtracks of any show I've watched.

At my old job (tech support), I watched a new hire once highlight text, right click for the context menu, and click "copy". And then right-click to hit "paste". Every time. They didn't know a single shortcut for anything. It was maddening to watch.

I gave em a lot of help because they were clearly not particularly tech savvy, but it made me wonder how the hell they got through the interview process with such a limited skillset.

Why not? I press a button and have a cup of boiling water less than 2 minutes later.