China condemns US attack on Venezuela as a violation of sovereignty and UN Charter. Global South unites against unilateral military aggression.
Related: 3 Reasons Iran Condemns US Attack on Venezuela as a Global Threat
5 Shocking Reasons China Condemns US Attack on Venezuela as Illegal and Dangerous
China condemns US attack on Venezuela in the strongest possible terms following Washington’s large-scale military incursion on Venezuelan soil early Saturday, January 3, 2026. In an official statement issued from Beijing, the Chinese government denounced the operation—which reportedly led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores—as a “flagrant use of force against a sovereign state” and a direct assault on the foundational pillars of the international legal order.
The Chinese Foreign Ministry labeled the action “hegemonic” and warned it endangers not only Venezuela’s sovereignty but the broader stability of Latin America and the Caribbean—a region long declared a “zone of peace” by its governments. According to Beijing, the U.S. strikes on both military and civilian infrastructure represent a systematic violation of the United Nations Charter and a dangerous precedent that could unravel decades of diplomatic consensus in the Global South.
This condemnation is not merely rhetorical. It reflects China’s deep strategic alignment with Venezuela on issues of sovereignty, anti-imperialism, and multilateralism. In recent years, the two nations have strengthened cooperation across energy, finance, and defense, often positioning themselves as counterweights to Western-led sanctions and regime-change policies. Now, China condemns U.S. attack on Venezuela as both a moral imperative and a defense of a rules-based world order that Washington appears determined to dismantle.
China Condemns US Attack on Venezuela as Hegemonic Violation of International Law
In its formal communiqué, Beijing accused the United States of deploying “hegemony under the guise of security,” highlighting how the military operation breaches core principles of the UN Charter, particularly Article 2(4), which prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.
The Chinese statement emphasized the targeting of civilian infrastructure—including power grids and residential areas—as especially alarming. “Such actions do not restore order; they sow chaos, suffering, and long-term destabilization,” the document read. By attacking non-military sites, Beijing argues, the U.S. has crossed a red line that separates legitimate security operations from acts of aggression that may constitute war crimes under international humanitarian law.
China’s position aligns with longstanding jurisprudence from the International Court of Justice, which has consistently held that unilateral military interventions—regardless of stated intent—violate international law unless authorized by the UN Security Council. Notably, no such authorization was sought or granted in this case, rendering the operation legally indefensible from Beijing’s perspective.
Furthermore, China warned that this intervention fits a disturbing historical pattern: U.S.-led regime change operations in Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa that have repeatedly triggered humanitarian crises, refugee flows, and prolonged instability. “When powerful nations bypass international institutions to impose their will by force,” the statement cautioned, “they do not bring democracy—they export destruction.”
Global South Unites Against U.S. Military Aggression
China’s condemnation arrives amid a rapid and coordinated diplomatic backlash from across the Global South. From Tehran to Montevideo, capitals are denouncing the U.S. attack on Venezuela as a direct threat to the principle of non-intervention—a cornerstone of post-colonial diplomacy. Russia has labeled the operation “armed aggression,” while Cuban President Miguel Díaz-Canel called it “state terrorism.” Colombian President Gustavo Petro has called for an emergency UN session to halt the escalation.
Beijing positioned its response within this broader coalition, stressing that Latin America’s declaration as a “zone of peace” must be respected. “The peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean have the right to determine their own destiny without external interference,” the Chinese statement affirmed, echoing language used by regional bodies like CELAC (Community of Latin American and Caribbean States).
As a leading advocate for multipolarity and South-South cooperation, China sees this moment as a critical test of whether international law will apply equally—or only to the weak. The PRC reaffirmed its strategic partnership with Venezuela, recalling years of mutual support in multilateral forums and joint resistance to unilateral sanctions. “Caracas is not alone,” the statement implied. “It stands with a growing front of nations committed to sovereignty over subjugation.”
Notably, even traditionally neutral actors are breaking ranks. Spanish MEP Irene Montero demanded her government sever ties with NATO, declaring, “The U.S. is a danger. Either we stop them, or they’ll burn everything down.” In Uruguay, while the official government remains silent, prominent figures from the ruling Frente Amplio—such as Rafael Michelini—have called for “total and radical condemnation,” warning that “the prairie of Latin America has been set on fire.”
Geopolitical Context: A Multipolar World Pushes Back
The U.S. attack on Venezuela—and China’s forceful response—marks a pivotal moment in 21st-century geopolitics. For decades, Washington treated Latin America as its “backyard,” intervening with relative impunity. But today’s landscape is fundamentally different. China, Russia, Iran, and regional powers have deepened ties with Caracas, transforming Venezuela into a strategic node in a multipolar network that challenges U.S. dominance.
Beijing’s condemnation is thus both principled and strategic. On one level, it defends the norm of non-intervention that protects smaller states—including, potentially, China itself—from foreign coercion. On another, it reinforces Beijing’s image as a responsible global actor that champions dialogue over bombs, law over might.
Critically, this crisis occurs as global trust in U.S. leadership continues to erode. From climate inaction to endless wars, many nations now view Washington not as a guarantor of peace, but as a source of volatility. China’s stance seeks to capitalize on this disillusionment, offering an alternative vision rooted in mutual respect, economic cooperation, and legal restraint.
If the United Nations fails to act decisively—by condemning the attack, demanding accountability, and ensuring Venezuela’s sovereignty is restored—it may accelerate the very fragmentation the institution was designed to prevent. In that sense, China condemns U.S. attack on Venezuela not just for Caracas’s sake, but for the future of international order itself.
China’s Official Response: “Blatant Use of Force Against a Sovereign State”
Adding further weight to its diplomatic stance, China’s Foreign Ministry Spokesperson issued a direct and unequivocal response during a press briefing on January 3, 2026, when asked about reports of U.S. military strikes on Venezuela and former President Donald Trump’s claim on Truth Social that Maduro and his wife had been “successfully” captured and “flown out of the country.”
“China is deeply shocked by and strongly condemns the U.S.’s blatant use of force against a sovereign state and action against its president,” the spokesperson stated. “Such hegemonic acts of the U.S. seriously violate international law and Venezuela’s sovereignty, and threaten peace and security in Latin America and the Caribbean region. China firmly opposes it.”
The spokesperson went on to stress that Washington must “abide by international law and the purposes and principles of the UN Charter, and stop violating other countries’ sovereignty and security.” This official Q&A—widely circulated by Chinese state media—serves as the clearest articulation yet of Beijing’s rejection of what it frames not as a security operation, but as an act of imperial overreach that endangers the entire regional order. By explicitly referencing Trump’s social media post, China also underscored the volatility of treating geopolitical decisions as political theater—a critique increasingly echoed across the Global South.
Conclusion: Sovereignty as the Last Line of Defense
As smoke rises over Caracas and diplomatic cables flood UN headquarters, one message echoes from Beijing with unwavering clarity: sovereignty is non-negotiable. China’s condemnation of the U.S. attack on Venezuela is more than a defense of an ally—it is a stand for a world where nations, regardless of size or ideology, are shielded from the sword of unilateral power.
China condemns U.S. attack on Venezuela because it sees in this moment the ghost of interventions past—and the shadow of crises yet to come. But it also sees an opportunity: to rally the Global South, uphold the UN Charter, and prove that another world is not only possible, but already being built, one act of solidarity at a time.
From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.
Those responsible for the aggression are war criminals, the Bolivarian diplomat stressed.
On Saturday, Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yvan Gil stated that the U.S. military aggression against Venezuelan territory, along with the kidnapping of President Nicolas Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores, has revealed the true face of imperialism.
RELATED:
Trump Details Raid on President Maduro’s Residence
In remarks to teleSUR, the top diplomat asserted that those responsible for these acts are “the true aggressors and war criminals” and demanded proof that the Venezuelan leader and the first lady are alive.
Gil said this vile and criminal attack has the central objective of seizing Venezuela’s strategic natural resources. To this end, the Trump administration has been spreading false narratives to justify its criminal actions within Venezuelan territory.
“Venezuela remains firm in the defense of its sovereignty and of the peace championed by President Maduro,” the diplomat said, reaffirming the determination of the Bolivarian government and people to confront any attempt at foreign subjugation.
The US government bombed Venezuela, and Trump kidnapped President Nicolás Maduro and flew him out of the country to be tried in a show trial on politically motivated charges.
In this video, I explain the real reasons behind the USA's imperialist war of aggression on Venezuela: pic.twitter.com/klhWSNvXCp
— Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) January 3, 2026
“We know that behind this attack there is no other reason, no other motive, than the intention to appropriate natural wealth,” Gil said and lamented that the attack occurred just hours after President Maduro issued a message in favor of peace, dialogue and diplomacy.
“We are for peace and democracy, but we are also firm in defending our nation. We also know where the aggressors are,” the Venezuelan foreign minister said.
For several weeks, Venezuela had been denouncing before various international forums an escalation of U.S. illegal actions, including veiled threats, intimidating military movements and covert operations aimed at destabilizing the South American country.
Venezuelan authorities repeatedly warned that these maneuvers violate international law and the United Nations Charter, while alerting about the risk of direct aggression.
The U.S. military attack on Jan. 3 confirms the prior denunciations and demonstrates that the pressure strategy against Venezuela has escalated into open criminal action.
The Venezuelan defense minister, Vladimir Padrino Lopez, made public statements following the attacks suffered by the country in the early hours of the morning by the United States. He addressed the people with the following: Heroic people of Venezuela! Soldiers of the… pic.twitter.com/XCX6EguCJk
— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) January 3, 2026
teleSUR/ JF
Source: teleSUR
From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.
U.S. forces kidnapped the Venezuelan leader and are taking him to New York.
In a Saturday interview with Fox News, President Donald Trump admitted that U.S. forces entered the residence of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores.
RELATED:
Socialist Party Calls on Venezuelans to Take to the Streets
“He was in a dwelling that looked more like a fortress than a house. It had steel doors. It had what they call a safe room, with solid steel all around. He didn’t manage to close that room. He was trying to get in, but they surprised him so fast he couldn’t enter,” he said.
“We were prepared. We had, you know, huge blowtorches and everything needed to cut through that steel. But we didn’t need it. He didn’t make it to that part of the house,” the Republican leader added.
Trump also admitted that the U.S. military had planned to carry out the aggression against Venezuela “four days ago,” but the armed action was postponed due to bad weather.
Venezuelans take to the streets in rejection and protest against U.S. military aggression. pic.twitter.com/Ce12jEgBes
— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) January 3, 2026
“The weather has to be perfect. And we had perfect weather. We had, you know, a very good one. A few more clouds than we expected. It was fine. We waited four days. We were going to do it four days ago, three days ago, two days ago. And suddenly, the window opened and we said go. And I’ll tell you, it was just incredible,” he said.
Trump announced that President Maduro and his wife were taken “out of the country” after the U.S. attack, an operation that affected Caracas and the states of Miranda, La Guaira and Aragua. U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said that they “will soon face the full force of American justice on American soil and in American courts.”
“Nicolas Maduro has been charged with narco-terrorism conspiracy, conspiracy to import cocaine, possession of machine guns and destructive devices, and conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices against the United States,” Bondi said, indicating that both the Venezuelan leader and the first lady were charged in the Southern District of New York.
The Venezuelan government issued a statement on Saturday following the first U.S. airstrike against Caracas: “This act constitutes a flagrant violation of the UN Charter, specifically its Articles 1 and 2, which enshrine respect for sovereignty, the legal equality of States, and the prohibition of the use of force. Such aggression threatens international peace and stability, particularly in Latin America and the Caribbean, and gravely endangers the lives of millions of people.”
Madelein Garcia, teleSUR correspondent, reports from La Carlota military base, one of the places that was hit by U.S. missiles in the attack they carried out against the nation in the early hours of January 3. pic.twitter.com/Mj9WKKrWJN
— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) January 3, 2026
teleSUR/ JF
Source: Fox – RT
From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.
Iran condemns US attack on Venezuela as illegal aggression violating UN Charter and global sovereignty. Discover Tehran’s diplomatic stance.
Related: 5 Alarming Truths: Mexico Condemns US Military Intervention in Venezuela as UN Charter Breach
5 Reasons Iran Condemns US Attack on Venezuela as a Global Threat
Iran condemns U.S. attack on Venezuela as a flagrant breach of international law and a dangerous escalation that threatens the foundations of the global order. On January 3, 2026, the Islamic Republic of Iran issued a forceful statement in response to Washington’s large-scale military operation on Venezuelan soil—an assault that, according to the White House, resulted in the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores.
From Tehran’s perspective, this is not merely a regional crisis. It is a systemic rupture with implications that extend far beyond Latin America. The Iranian Foreign Ministry framed the offensive as a textbook case of unilateral aggression, echoing historical patterns of imperial intervention that have long destabilized the Global South. In doing so, Iran positioned itself not only as a regional power but as a principled voice defending the sanctity of state sovereignty against military hegemony.
The gravity of Iran’s condemnation lies not just in its rhetoric but in its legal grounding. Tehran explicitly cited Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits the use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state. According to Iran, the U.S. strikes—reportedly targeting civilian infrastructure alongside military installations—constitute an “unequivocal act of aggression” that must be met with immediate international censure and legal accountability.
Iran Condemns US Attack on Venezuela as Illegal Under International Law
The Iranian Foreign Ministry’s statement, released on Saturday, January 3, 2026, pulled no punches. “This criminal, cowardly, and terrorist act by the United States violates every principle of international coexistence,” the document declared—words that closely mirror those used by Venezuelan Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello in Caracas hours earlier.
Iran emphasized the illegality of targeting civilian infrastructure, including electrical grids and residential zones, actions it described as potential war crimes under the Geneva Conventions. Tehran rejected any justification based on regime change or alleged humanitarian concerns, stressing that only the UN Security Council holds the legitimate authority to authorize the use of force—and even then, only as a last resort.
The International Court of Justice has repeatedly affirmed that unilateral military interventions, regardless of motive, violate the core tenets of the UN Charter. Iran’s stance aligns with this jurisprudence, positioning the U.S. operation not as an isolated incident but as part of a broader erosion of multilateralism. “When powerful states bypass the Security Council,” the statement warned, “they don’t restore order—they incite chaos.”
Crucially, Iran also underscored Venezuela’s inherent right to self-defense and resistance against foreign occupation—a principle enshrined in both international law and the historical consciousness of post-colonial states. By doing so, Tehran reinforced its long-standing advocacy for the Global South’s right to political autonomy, free from external coercion.
Iran Joins Global South Coalition Against U.S. Military Aggression
While Western media have focused on the tactical details of the U.S. operation, Iran’s diplomatic response underscores a deeper geopolitical realignment. Tehran’s condemnation places it firmly within a growing coalition of nations—including Russia, China, Cuba, and Colombia—that view the attack as a direct threat to regional peace and global legal norms.
Iran and Venezuela have cultivated close strategic ties for over two decades, particularly through their shared membership in the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) and their mutual opposition to U.S.-led sanctions regimes. In this context, Iran’s statement is both principled and pragmatic: it defends a key ally while reinforcing its own narrative as a champion of anti-imperialist sovereignty.
As a founding member of the Non-Aligned Movement, Iran has consistently opposed unilateral military interventions—from Iraq to Libya to Syria. The current crisis in Venezuela is seen through that same lens: not as a domestic political issue, but as a test of whether international law applies equally to all nations, or only to the weak.
Notably, Iran called on all UN member states to fulfill their “legal and moral duty” by demanding an immediate ceasefire, the withdrawal of U.S. forces, and accountability for those responsible for planning and executing the operation. It also urged the Security Council to invoke Chapter VII—not to authorize further force, but to sanction the aggressor and protect the sovereignty of the victim.
This stance resonates across Latin America, where leaders like Gustavo Petro of Colombia and Miguel Díaz-Canel of Cuba have echoed Iran’s concerns. Even within traditionally neutral countries like Uruguay, political figures from the ruling Frente Amplio—such as Rafael Michelini—have echoed Tehran’s alarm, warning that “the prairie of Latin America has been set on fire.”
Geopolitical Context: Iran’s Message to the World
Iran’s condemnation of the U.S. attack on Venezuela carries layered implications. At a time when Tehran faces its own threats of military action—particularly from Israel and hardliners in Washington—its vocal defense of Caracas serves as both a warning and a mirror. By highlighting the illegality of unilateral force, Iran seeks to reinforce norms that could one day protect its own sovereignty.
Moreover, the timing is significant. With Venezuela’s vast oil reserves and strategic location, the U.S. incursion risks triggering a wider confrontation involving Russia, China, and other non-Western powers. Iran’s intervention in the diplomatic arena aims to prevent escalation while strengthening South-South solidarity.
In essence, Iran is not just defending Venezuela—it is defending a vision of international order based on equality, mutual respect, and adherence to law, rather than power projection and regime change. In an era of resurgent great-power rivalry, that message carries weight far beyond the Middle East or Latin America.
Conclusion: A Sovereignty Line in the Sand
Iran condemns U.S. attack on Venezuela not out of blind allegiance, but as a matter of principle rooted in decades of anti-imperialist foreign policy. In a world where unilateralism increasingly masquerades as “strategic necessity,” Tehran’s statement is a stark reminder that sovereignty remains the bedrock of international peace.
Whether the UN will act—or whether the Global South can mount a coordinated response—remains uncertain. But one thing is clear: Iran has drawn a line in the sand, and it stands not alone, but alongside a growing bloc of nations determined to uphold the Charter that Washington now appears to have discarded.
From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.
The Bolivarian organization condemns “cowardly” attack.
On Saturday, the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) denounced the U.S. cowardly military aggression against the South American nation, which included the kidnapping of President Nicolas Maduro and First Lady Cilia Flores.
RELATED:
Colombia Condemns U.S. Strikes on Venezuela
“Faced with such a grave attack on our sovereignty, the PSUV calls for the immediate mobilization of all its members… In absolute unity, under the orders of our High Command, we, the Venezuelan men and women, are prepared to defend our country against any type of foreign attack,” the PSUV stated. It demanded that U.S. President Donald Trump’s administration prove that Maduro and his wife are alive.
“We are the party founded by Commander Hugo Chavez, the political and moral vanguard of the Bolivarian Revolution. That is why we close ranks, today more than ever, with the Bolivarian government and express our absolute loyalty to President Nicolas Maduro,” the PSUV added.
The Socialist party called on governments and the international community to “express total condemnation” of the U.S. “grotesque” military action, which “violates the United Nations Charter and tramples international law.”
The US are bombing Caracas. This is State Terrorism. Where's the condemnation from EU Member States..? pic.twitter.com/8w4kKwFi3B
— Mick Wallace (@wallacemick) January 3, 2026
“Let international indignation rise firmly against the escalation of imperialist war that threatens the peace of the entire Latin American and Caribbean region and has already claimed the lives of military martyrs and innocent civilians! People to the streets in perfect popular, military and police fusion,” the PSUV emphasized.
In the early hours of Saturday, Trump announced that his country had “successfully carried out a large-scale attack against Venezuela” and detained President Maduro and his wife.
Shortly afterward, Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodriguez confirmed the events as well as the killing of soldiers and civilians during U.S. airstrikes in Caracas and three other states in the country.
From the United States, Attorney General Pamela Bondi reported that Maduro and Flores have been charged with alleged “narco-terrorism conspiracy” and will be prosecuted by U.S. authorities.
The Venezuelan people are mobilizing in rejection of U.S. aggression and in support of President Nicolas Maduro. pic.twitter.com/uNOcMFlv3U
— teleSUR English (@telesurenglish) January 3, 2026
teleSUR/ JF
Source: RT
From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.