rss

joined 2 months ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is expected to ask President Trump to support another US-Israeli war on Iran, according to an NBC News report from Saturday. The report said that Netanyahu will stress Israel’s concern over Iran’s production of ballistic missiles and will present Trump with options for the US to join or assist Israel […]


From News From Antiwar.com via This RSS Feed.

 

The Ministry of Health in the Palestinian enclave reported this Sunday that 62% of primary care medications are unavailable, and the limited supplies do not cover the needs of patients in the Gaza Strip.

RELATED:

Satellite Analysis Shows Israel Entrenching Control in Gaza

A total of 288,208 patients are at risk of serious relapses, including strokes and heart attacks, the Gazan Health Ministry added.

The List of Essential Medicines, considered by the Ministry of Health for its report, is an internationally recognized list published by the World Health Organization (WHO). It identifies the most important medicines to meet the priority health needs of the population.

Director of Pharmaceutical Care at the Palestinian Ministry of Health in Gaza, Dr. Alaa Helles, says there is a severe shortage of vital medications in Gaza. The highest it has been in two years. Israel is not allowing medicine into Gaza. pic.twitter.com/VuySKCAtkf

— Samira Mohyeddin سمیرا (@SMohyeddin) December 21, 2025

“The health system in the Gaza Strip is in a serious state of unprecedented deterioration after two years of war and a total blockade. This has led to a drastic decrease in its capacity to provide diagnostic and treatment services, along with a severe shortage of medicines,” a statement said.

70% of oncology service medications are also unavailable; laboratory tests and supplies for blood banks only cover 59%; and there is a 38% deficit in emergency and intensive care services, which could deprive 200,000 patients of emergency care, according to the ministry.

“Cardiac catheterization and open-heart surgery services have been completely suspended, as 100% of the necessary medications and medical supplies are unavailable,” the ministry added.

On the other hand, regarding medical evacuations in Gaza, the WHO reported weeks ago that 10,645 were carried out since the beginning of the conflict (October 2023), but only in the period between July 2024 and the end of last November, more than 1,000 patients died while waiting to be taken out of the Strip for treatment.


From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

 

The past week saw a new wave of repression by the Tunisian authorities against protesters. At least 21 people were arrested during anti-government demonstrations in the Kairouan region, which lasted a couple of days.

These protests erupted in Kairouan after young Tunisian citizen Naim Briki died on Friday, December 12, due to severe injuries he had sustained at the hands of the police on November 22.

According to media reports, the police chased Briki after he allegedly evaded being checked by them, because he was riding a motorcycle without proper documentation.

The pursuit of the young man ended with the collision of his motorcycle with a police vehicle. His family also reported that he was brutally beaten by several police officers later.

Briki’s death epitomizes the Tunisian authorities’ policy of impunity, says FTDES

Tunisian Forum for Economic and Social Rights (FTDES) issued a statement on Tuesday, December 16, strongly condemning “all forms of police violence and excessive use of force”.

“The death of Naim Briki highlights the recurring tragedies linked to systematic police violence and epitomizes, once again, the policy of impunity,” the statement reads.

The forum also demanded “full responsibility be assigned to anyone proven to have been involved” in murdering Briki.

The FTDES further called for a “transparent judicial investigation” into the crime, in a way that guarantees revealing the full truth, and holding whoever is responsible accountable “without discrimination or institutional protection”.

Moreover, it warned the authorities to end the impunity in cases of torture and police violence, and to stop the repression, and legal prosecution of protesters.

It is worth mentioning that the Tunisian judiciary ordered the release of 20 people, who were arrested in connection to the protests, on Monday, December 14, but it issued arrest warrants for four others over involvement in the same events.

Meanwhile, the public prosecutor’s office in Kairouan announced that same day, the opening of an inquiry to uncover the circumstances of Briki’s death.

The post Tunisian authorities arrest 21 people connected to protests in Kairouan appeared first on Peoples Dispatch.


From Peoples Dispatch via This RSS Feed.

 

Israel's Cabinet on Sunday finalized approval of 19 new Jewish-only settler colonies in the illegally occupied West Bank, a move the apartheid state's far-right finance minister said was aimed at thwarting Palestinian statehood.

Cabinet ministers approved the legalization of the previously unauthorized settler outposts throughout the occupied Palestinian territory, bringing the total number of new settlements in recent years to 69.

The move will bring the overall total number of exclusively or overwhelmingly Jewish settlements—which are illegal under international law—to more than 200, up from around 140 just three years ago.

Included in the new approval are two former settlements—Kadim and Ganim—that were evacuated in compliance with the now effectively repealed 2005 Disengagement Law, under which Israel dismantled all of its colonies in the Gaza Strip and four in the West Bank.

"This is righting a historic injustice of expulsion from 20 years ago," Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich—who is a settler—said on Sunday. "We are putting the brakes on the rise of a Palestinian terror state."

"We will continue to develop, build, and settle the inherited land of our ancestors, with faith in the righteousness of our path," Smotrich added.

— (@)

Following an earlier round of approval for the new settlements last week, Palestinian presidential spokesperson Nabil Abu Rudeineh said, “All Israeli settlement activity is illegal and constitutes a violation of international law and international legitimacy resolutions."

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres earlier this month denounced Israel's "relentless" settlement expansion.

Such colonization, said Guterres, "continues to fuel tensions, impede access by Palestinians to their land, and threaten the viability of a fully independent, democratic, contiguous, and sovereign Palestinian state."

— (@)

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other Israeli officials—some of whom, including Smotrich, deny the very existence of the Palestinian people—have vowed that such a state will not be established.

While Netanyahu—who is wanted by the International Criminal Court for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza—is under pressure from right-wing and far-right government officials, settlers, and others to annex all of the West Bank, US President Donald Trump recently said that "Israel would lose all of its support from the United States if that happened."

Some doubted Trump's threat, with Democracy for the Arab World Now (DAWN) executive director Sarah Leah Whitson reacting to the new settlements' approval by posting on X that "the ONLY reason Israel gets away with this naked thievery is US military and political support."

Israel seized and occupied the West Bank including East Jerusalem along with Gaza in 1967, ethnically cleansing around 300,000 Palestinians. Many of these forcibly displaced people were survivors of the Nakba, the Jewish terror and ethnic cleansing campaign that saw more than 750,000 Palestinians flee or be forced from Palestine during the foundation of the modern state of Israel.

Since 1967, Israel has steadily seized more and more Palestinian land in the West Bank while building and expanding colonies there. Settlement population has increased exponentially from around 1,500 colonists in 1970 to roughly 140,000 at the time of the Oslo Accords in 1993—under which Israel agreed to halt new settlement activity—to around 770,000 today.

Settlers often attack Palestinians and their property, including in deadly pogroms, in order to terrorize them into leaving so their land can be stolen. Israeli colonists have also attacked Israel Defense Forces soldiers they view as standing in the way of their expansion.

In July 2024, the International Court of Justice—where Israel is currently facing a genocide case related to the Gaza war—found the occupation of Palestine to be an illegal form of apartheid that must be ended as soon as possible. The ICJ also ruled that Israeli settler colonization of the West Bank amounts to annexation, also a crime under international law. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention states that an “occupying power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies.”

As the world's attention focused on Gaza during the past two years, Israeli soldiers and settlers have killed at least 1,039 Palestinians—at least 225 of them children—in the West Bank. This year, at least 233 Palestinians, including at least 52 children, have been killed so far, according to the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestinian Refugees in the Near East.

On Saturday, Israeli occupation forces shot and killed two Palestinians in the northern West Bank, including a 16-year-old boy, Rayan Abu Muallah, who the Israel Defense Forces said was shot after he threw an object at its troops.


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

 

Ant Middleton is a former soldier in the special forces with his sights set on becoming the next London Mayor. Demonstrating why he may not have the smarts for such a role, he’s shared a recycled misinformation campaign from the 2024 US election campaign, only this time the image is alleged to be from Newport, Wales:

FFS indeed.

Such an impressive track record from Ant Middleton

A recent Substack described Ant Middleton as follows:

With an elite military background spanning the Royal Marines, 9 Parachute Squadron, and Special Boat Service (SBS), Ant has built a reputation as one of the most formidable minds in mental and physical endurance.

I don’t know about you, but I’d hardly say sharing misleading inflammatory content is indicative of ‘one of the most formidable minds in mental and physical endurance’. Far from it.

Earlier this year, Wales Online reported that Middleton has been banned from being a company director following a failure to pay over £1m in tax. Again, hardly indicative of someone who would do a good job in charge of our capital city.

Snopes exposed the image Middleton shared as misleading in 2024, when it was peddled by far-right politicians and influencers in the US. The image was found to originate on a reddit thread, and was taken in Columbus, Ohio – not Springfield, as was suggested. While Snopes did not confirm how the bird died or what subsequently happened to it, they did conclude it had nothing to do with the ‘they’re eating the dogs‘ panic which Trump was spreading about the Somali population of Springfield.

Trump: “They’re eating the dogs. They’re eating the cats.”

Follow: @AFpost pic.twitter.com/yPsEteHumA

— AF Post (@AFpost) September 11, 2024

THEY'RE EATING THE DOGS! AND THE ENDANGERED SPECIES! pic.twitter.com/ImjFjhyRbl

— Not Real Donald Trump (@RealDonalDrumpf) September 11, 2024

Originally deployed to cause panic about a ‘migrant crisis’ in the US, Middleton is now using the same image to incite fear and hatred in our own communities.

It wasn’t an easy mistake to make..

Plenty of other accounts saw through the fake news, using quite simple deductive reasoning:

Big houses on wide road
Enormous plots, metal boundaries
Lawns parched; sky clear of raincloud
No front garden plants, just lawn
Mail delivered to a garden post
Off road parking
American license plate
No litter, wheelie bins, potholes or evidence of cable laying

Not Wales. https://t.co/OGPVfSHUW8

— Lachlan Stuart🗽🏳️‍🌈 🇺🇦 (@Lachlan_Edi) December 20, 2025

Even community notes corrected the error, not that Ant Middleton seems to care:

Love a community note. Unsurprised Ant Middleton can’t figure out the difference between Welsh and American suburbs. pic.twitter.com/Ik9TQLPf4e

— Civic Kieran (@KieranCivPol) December 21, 2025

Speaking about potential motivations for churning out false information:

Shit like this is how you know most far right accounts are desperate for US attention and money.

-the story itself is basically a copy of the Haitian immigrant claims
-the image they use is very clearly in the us not wales
-the image is a guy who was actually helping the geese https://t.co/gAoIxwyEKx pic.twitter.com/SJUj5Ne8p5

— kian (@kianthequark) December 20, 2025

It hardly seems like Middleton is even familiar with what our homes and roads look like.

Surely someone who wants to run for Mayor of London would care about the accuracy and legitimacy of his posts and those he retweets? Or maybe, just maybe, the wellbeing of the UK isn’t really his priority, as alluded to in the following tweet:

You're out in the freezing winter rain hanging flags on lamp posts.

Tommy Robinson and Ant Middleton are living it large in a Muslim country.

You are not the same – you aren't even fighting the same 'enemy.' pic.twitter.com/Qatcq9vqnA

— Woke Lefty 🫣 (@SalfordMe2023) December 19, 2025

Tommy Robinson, close ally of Ant Middleton, was shouted down in Dubai whilst being interviewed. Ty Mitchell, professional boxer and Muslim from Derby, failed to hide his disgust at seeing Robinson getting air-time, and quickly attempted to shut it down.

Pointing out the racism, division, and hate that Robinson is fuelling back home, Mitchell demanded the media stop giving oxygen to his bile. He also pointed out that Robinson only seems to care about Muslim offenders, conveniently ignoring or defending his mates in the face of allegations of sex crimes.

The video below shows Middleton alongside Robinson during the heated exchange:

A different angle shows that Ant Middleton was there when tiny Tommy got bullied. pic.twitter.com/Va7t7RayK6

— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) December 19, 2025

So zionist shill Tommy Robinson just said "the majority of nonces [in the UK] are white" admitting he chooses not to speak on it. He's a rage-baiting state-asset fucktard who exists to divide and incite hate and make damn sure we are all distracted, screaming at each other… https://t.co/ujF8abdYSg

— Fiona Rose Diamond (@CoviLeaks) December 19, 2025

Determining whose interests Robinson and Middleton are actually working in doesn’t take a genius:

British Muslim revert boxer, Ty Mitchell, confronted the notorious Islamophobe and Israeli agent Tommy Robinson at a Misfits boxing event in Dubai. Ant Middleton watched on as Tiny Tommy got bullied. pic.twitter.com/n29fui8PsR

— Muslim Daily (@muslimdaily_) December 20, 2025

Hate never helps anyone

The British far-right have a long history of churning out misinformation for their own agenda. Our own Willem Moore reported on the dangerous lie that Robinson shared earlier this month:

10 dead as a car is driven into a Christmas market preparation crowds in France’s Guadeloupe.

Legacy media silent. pic.twitter.com/MlITDYQ372

— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) December 6, 2025

Clearly people like Ant Middleton and Tommy Robinson don’t care about anything but their own egos and self-interest.

Featured image via Snopes

By Maddison Wheeldon


From Canary via This RSS Feed.

 

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange filed a criminal complaint on Tuesday, December 17, against the Nobel Foundation, accusing 30 members of the organization, including its chairwoman and executive director, of involvement in serious crimes under Swedish law. The action challenges the Norwegian Nobel Peace Committee’s decision to award this year’s prize to far-right Venezuelan politician María Corina Machado.

Assange is requesting the immediate freezing of 11 million Swedish kronor (approximately USD 1.18 million) scheduled to be transferred to Machado, arguing that awarding the prize completely distorts the principles expressed in Alfred Nobel’s will, which stipulated that the prize should go to whoever worked for fraternity among nations and the reduction of standing armies.

In the complaint submitted to Sweden’s Economic Crimes Authority and War Crimes Unit, Assange maintains that the selection of María Corina “converted an instrument of peace into an instrument of war.” The legal filing mentions possible crimes including misappropriation of funds, facilitation of war crimes and crimes against humanity, as well as financing the crime of aggression. Assange argues that “Machado’s incitement of the largest US military buildup since the Iraq war makes her categorically ineligible.”

Read more: Machado’s Nobel Peace Prize “stained with blood,” social movements warn

The document lists recent public statements by the Venezuelan politician, such as explicit support for the United States’ military strategy in the Caribbean, her advocacy for military intervention in the South American country, and alignment with the offensive by Donald Trump, the US president reelected in 2024. “Alfred Nobel’s endowment for peace cannot be spent on the promotion of war,” Assange stated in the filing.

Beyond challenging the selection of María Corina, the WikiLeaks founder questions why the Nobel Foundation did not exercise the same oversight it had in 2018, when it suspended the transfer of the Literature prize. Assange notes that the administrators have a legal obligation to ensure compliance with Alfred Nobel’s will, and that any disbursement contrary to its purpose may constitute a crime.

Between war and oil: Nobel deepens international crisis

The complaint comes amid a major US military escalation in the Caribbean region. Just two days after the Nobel Peace ceremony on December 10, Trump announced that military attacks on Venezuela “would begin by land.” The deployment of more than 15,000 soldiers, including the aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford, is considered by analysts to be the largest US military deployment in the Caribbean since the Missile Crisis in 1962.

María Corina, who has been in exile since July 2024 following coup attempts against Nicolás Maduro’s reelection, welcomed the mobilization. In an interview with CBS, she declared unconditional support for Trump’s strategy and said she aspires to the Venezuelan presidency following a possible foreign intervention.

Read more: María Corina Machado: another Nobel Prize for war

Assange

Assange’s own trajectory is also directly shaped by conflicts like those now involving Venezuela. Persecuted for more than a decade for revealing war crimes committed by the US in Afghanistan and Iraq, he spent seven years in asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in London and five years imprisoned under maximum security in the United Kingdom. Released in June 2024 following a judicial agreement with the US, he now lives in Australia, his home country.

Assange’s criminal complaint against the Nobel Foundation requests, among other measures, that the money be frozen, the medal returned, the foundation members investigated, and that the case potentially be referred to the International Criminal Court. For the activist, the 2025 prize marks a dangerous turning point: “María Corina Machado may have tipped the scales in favor of war, facilitated by the named suspects.”

First published in Portuguese at Brasil de Fato.

The post Julian Assange says peace prize has become “instrument of war” and sues Nobel appeared first on Peoples Dispatch.


From Peoples Dispatch via This RSS Feed.

 

By Atul Chandra  –  Dec 18, 2025

As Bangladesh marks the victory of its 1971 liberation, the secular, socialist foundations of the nation’s birth are under assault by the convergence of US geopolitical interests with religious fundamentalism.

On December 16, 1971, Lieutenant General A.A.K. Niazi signed the instrument of surrender in Dhaka, marking the birth of Bangladesh and the defeat of a genocidal military campaign that had claimed hundreds of thousands of lives. Fifty-four years later, as Bangladesh prepares to observe Victory Day, the foundational principles of that liberation: nationalism, secularism, socialism and democracy, stand in ruins. The statues of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman have been torn down. The party that led the liberation struggle has been banned. Its leader and former prime minister, Sheikh Hasina, has been sentenced to death in absentia. And the political forces that collaborated with the Pakistani military in 1971, most notably Jamaat-e-Islami, are once again ascendant in national politics. What we are witnessing is not merely a change of government but an attempted erasure of Bangladesh’s founding identity, orchestrated through the convergence of US imperial interests and domestic religious fundamentalism.

The compact of 1971
The Bangladesh Liberation War was never simply about territorial separation from Pakistan. It represented a decisive rejection of the two-nation theory that had partitioned the subcontinent along religious lines in 1947. The Bangla Bhasha Movement of 1952, which provided the cultural foundation for Bengali nationalism, asserted that linguistic and cultural identity, not religious affiliation, would define the political community. When Sheikh Mujibur Rahman’s Awami League won the 1970 elections and was denied power by the Pakistani military establishment, the liberation struggle that followed crystallized around four constitutional pillars: nationalism, secularism, socialism, and democracy.

The 1972 Constitution gave institutional expression to these principles. Article 12 specifically mandated the elimination of communalism, prohibited granting political status to any religion, and forbade the abuse of religion for political purposes. This was not an abstract commitment to Western-style secularism but a direct response to the lived experience of genocide. The Pakistani military’s campaign of mass murder, rape, and destruction had been actively supported by religion-based parties, particularly Jamaat-e-Islami, whose members organized collaborationist militias such as the Razakar, Al-Badr, and Al-Shams. These forces participated in the systematic targeting of Bengali nationalists, Hindu minorities, and intellectuals. The constitutional ban on religion-based politics emerged organically from the liberation movement’s determination that such atrocities would never recur.

The assassination of Sheikh Mujibur Rahman on August 15, 1975, along with most of his family, inaugurated a systematic dismantling of this founding compact. General Ziaur Rahman’s military regime replaced “secularism” with “Absolute Trust and Faith in the Almighty Allah” through the 1977 constitutional amendment and lifted the ban on religion-based political parties. Jamaat-e-Islami, whose leaders had fled to Pakistan after 1971, returned to political life. The declaration of Islam as the state religion in 1988 completed the constitutional counter-revolution. Yet even through these reversals, the memory of 1971 and the institutional framework of the Awami League preserved a contested space for secular nationalism. The war crimes trials initiated under Sheikh Hasina’s government between 2010 and 2016, which resulted in the conviction and execution of several Jamaat leaders for their role in the 1971 genocide, represented the most significant attempt to reckon with this history and defend the liberation’s legacy.

US Regime-Change Front Funded Nepalese Youth Revolutionaries, Leaks Reveal

The geopolitics of regime change
The events of August 2024 must be understood within the broader context of great power competition in the Indo-Pacific. Bangladesh occupies a position of exceptional strategic significance. Situated at the confluence of South and Southeast Asia, with a coastline on the Bay of Bengal through which approximately one quarter of global maritime trade passes, it represents what US strategic planners have identified as a crucial node in the architecture of China containment. The US Indo-Pacific Strategy, operationalized through the Quad alliance and a network of military partnerships, requires cooperative governments throughout the region. Bangladesh under Sheikh Hasina, with its extensive economic ties to China through the Belt and Road Initiative and its refusal to provide military facilities to the United States, particularly on St. Martin’s Island, represented an obstacle to this strategy.

Sheikh Hasina herself claimed, in statements reported by Indian media, that a “country of white-skinned people” was attempting to destabilize her government because she refused to compromise Bangladesh’s sovereignty. The chronology is suggestive. In May 2024, US officials visited Dhaka to discuss the Indo-Pacific Strategy. Within weeks, protests that had begun over civil service job quotas transformed into a broader movement demanding Hasina’s resignation. By August 5, she had fled the country. The speed with which the United States embraced the interim government under Muhammad Yunus, including a USD 202 million USAID package and President Biden’s meeting with Yunus at the UN General Assembly in September, indicates a level of prior coordination that demands scrutiny.

Chinese analysts have been explicit about their concerns. Scholars at Chinese research institutions have noted that Bangladesh’s geopolitical position makes it a potential “gamechanger” in South Asian politics if the United States succeeds in reshaping its political orientation. The interim government’s early diplomatic overtures to Washington, combined with its cooling of relations with India, suggest that these concerns are well-founded. The pattern is familiar from Pakistan, where Imran Khan has alleged US involvement in his 2022 ouster, and from numerous other instances across the Global South where governments pursuing independent foreign policies have faced destabilization.

The fundamentalist vehicle
The domestic instrument for this realignment has been the rehabilitation of religious fundamentalist forces. The interim government’s lifting of the ban on Jamaat-e-Islami, imposed under anti-terrorism legislation, has enabled a party whose leaders were convicted of genocide to re-enter political life. The growing influence of Hefazat-e-Islam, which had previously mobilized against secular bloggers and successfully pressured for the removal of a Lady Justice statue from the Supreme Court premises in 2017, signals a broader shift in the political climate. The destruction of Mujibur Rahman’s statues and the Bangabandhu Memorial Museum in August 2024 was not random vandalism but symbolic annihilation of the secular nationalist legacy.

The consequences for religious minorities have been severe. According to the Bangladesh Hindu Buddhist Christian Unity Council, over 2,000 incidents of communal violence occurred in the weeks following Hasina’s ouster, including attacks on temples and the destruction of Hindu-owned properties. A UN report documented 2,924 attacks against religious minority communities in July 2024. The arrest of ISKCON priest Chinmoy Das in late 2024 provoked international concern. These are not isolated incidents but symptoms of a systematic unravelling of the pluralist social fabric that the 1972 Constitution sought to protect.

The 2026 elections, scheduled for February 12, will be conducted with the Awami League banned and its leader sentenced to death. The death sentence handed down by the International Crimes Tribunal on November 17, 2025, was delivered in absentia, without Hasina being represented by counsel of her choosing. Human Rights Watch said that the proceedings are failing to meet international fair trial standards. Whatever one’s assessment of Hasina’s governance record, the exclusion of the country’s largest political party from electoral competition makes a mockery of democratic principles. The Awami League’s characterization of the upcoming polls as elections “held for appearance, power decided in advance” contains more than rhetorical force.

On the occasion of Bangladesh’s Victory Day, the question confronting Bangladesh is whether the liberation of 1971 will survive the forces now arrayed against it. The secular, sovereign nation that emerged from the sacrifice of millions is being dismantled by a coalition of imperial interests seeking a strategic advantage in the Indo-Pacific and domestic fundamentalist forces seeking to complete the counter-revolution begun in 1975. The destruction of Bangabandhu’s memory is not incidental to this project but central to it. For what is being erased is not merely a political leader but the very idea of Bangladesh as a nation defined by linguistic and cultural identity rather than religious affiliation.

The struggle over Bangladesh is ultimately a struggle over whether the Global South can chart independent paths of development or must submit to the strategic imperatives of declining imperial powers. The forces that opposed Bangladesh’s birth in 1971, that collaborated in genocide, that have spent five decades working to undo the liberation’s progressive content, are today closer to victory than at any point since independence. Whether they succeed will depend not only on the resilience of secular and democratic forces within Bangladesh but on the solidarity of progressive movements across the region and the world. The liberation is not yet complete. It may never be complete. But on December 16, it is under siege as never before.

Atul Chandra is the co-coordinator of the Asia Desk at the Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

(People’s Dispatch)


From Orinoco Tribune – News and opinion pieces about Venezuela and beyond via This RSS Feed.

 

ELN Christmas ceasefire 2025 declared across Colombia, offering seven days of peace amid rising tensions over U.S. military presence in the Caribbean.

The ELN Christmas ceasefire 2025 offers respite for Colombians amid denunciations of U.S. naval aggression and regional militarization in the Caribbean.

Related: 10-Year Colombia Defense Budget 2025 Plan: $12.7 Billion to Counter Armed Violence and Restore State Presence


comunicado-2112-25Download

In a significant gesture of seasonal goodwill, Colombia’s National Liberation Army (ELN) has declared a unilateral Christmas ceasefire across the country, effective from 12:00 a.m. on December 24, 2025, through 12:00 a.m. on January 3, 2026. The insurgent group announced the pause in hostilities via an official communiqué, extending a message of peace to the Colombian people and reaffirming its longstanding tradition of halting military operations during the holiday season.

“This ceasefire is a gift of tranquility to the Colombian people during this sacred time of family, reflection, and hope,” the ELN stated, emphasizing that the measure aims to allow communities—especially in rural and conflict-affected regions—to celebrate without fear of violence.

The announcement comes amid heightened tensions in Colombia’s northern departments, where the ELN recently carried out a series of attacks on military bases and police stations in Cesar and Norte de Santander. These actions, the group explained, were a direct response to what it describes as an escalating U.S.-led military offensive in the Caribbean, which it claims threatens the sovereignty of nations across Latin America.


ELN Christmas Ceasefire 2025: A Pause for Peace Amid Imperial Aggression

While offering peace for the holidays, the ELN used its communiqué to denounce the presence of U.S. naval forces in the Caribbean Sea, which it accuses of conducting “acts of piracy” against civilian vessels. According to the group, U.S. warships have sunk more than 30 boats and caused loss of life in international waters near Colombia under the guise of counter-narcotics operations—a claim echoing recent statements by the Venezuelan and Cuban governments.

“The recent surge in armed actions, including our 72-hour armed stoppage, is a necessary response to the warlike aggression promoted by Washington,” the ELN declared. “We will not stand idly by while foreign powers seek to control our seas, plunder our resources, and dictate the fate of our peoples.”

The group explicitly rejected the deployment of U.S. troops in the region, framing it as part of a broader imperial strategy to dominate the Global South. In 2025, this strategy has intensified, with the U.S. Southern Command expanding naval patrols, establishing temporary bases on Caribbean islands, and coordinating joint exercises with regional allies—moves that critics argue violate the spirit of the CELAC “Zone of Peace” declaration.

Read the Organization of American States’ latest report on peace efforts in Colombia

Despite ongoing peace negotiations between the ELN and the government of President Gustavo Petro—widely regarded as the most promising dialogues in decades—the conflict remains volatile. Just days before the ceasefire announcement, a clash in a rural area of Colombia left four soldiers dead, underscoring the fragility of the current truce framework.

Yet the ELN’s decision to honor the Christmas pause reflects its commitment to humanitarian principles, even amid distrust. Historically, the group has respected holiday ceasefires, using them not only as acts of goodwill but also as opportunities to engage in internal reflection and community dialogue. This year’s gesture carries added weight, coming at a time when U.S. policy appears increasingly interventionist.

Explore UN Office on Colombia’s support for humanitarian ceasefires and peace implementation

For many Colombians, especially in Indigenous and Afro-Colombian territories where state presence is minimal and armed groups exert influence, such pauses are lifelines—windows of safety to travel, trade, and reunite with loved ones. Civil society organizations have welcomed the ELN’s announcement and called on all armed actors, including state forces, to reciprocate the restraint.


Geopolitical Context: Latin America’s Sovereignty Under Maritime Siege

The ELN Christmas ceasefire 2025 must be understood within a wider regional crisis: the militarization of the Caribbean and Pacific coasts by external powers, primarily the United States. Under the banner of “counternarcotics” and “security cooperation,” Washington has intensified naval operations near Colombia, Venezuela, and Central America—often without the explicit consent of host governments.

This posture, critics argue, revives the Monroe Doctrine in modern guise, asserting U.S. dominance over what it deems its “sphere of influence.” The consequences are severe: civilian vessels are boarded, fishermen are detained, and maritime trade routes are surveilled—creating a climate of fear that particularly affects small-scale fishers and coastal communities.

Moreover, the timing is critical. As Colombia advances its “Total Peace” policy under President Petro—a strategy seeking simultaneous negotiations with all remaining armed groups—external interference risks derailing domestic progress. The ELN’s linkage of its armed actions to U.S. naval conduct suggests that regional peace cannot be achieved without confronting imperial overreach.

Globally, this dynamic reflects a growing rift between the Global North and South. While Western institutions frame military deployments as “stability operations,” many Global South nations view them as neo-colonial intrusions that undermine self-determination. In Latin America, where memories of CIA-backed coups and banana wars remain vivid, such deployments trigger deep historical trauma.

Review the CELAC Havana Declaration on Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace

For Colombia—a nation scarred by six decades of internal conflict—the path to peace is both internal and geopolitical. The ELN’s ceasefire offers a moment of respite, but lasting tranquility requires more than goodwill; it demands respect for sovereignty, demilitarization of seas, and an end to foreign intervention.

As church bells ring across the Andes and families gather in villages from Chocó to La Guajira, the ELN’s message is clear: peace is possible, but only if empire steps back.



From teleSUR English via This RSS Feed.

 

ANews Podcast 446 - 12.19.25 thecollective Sun, 12/21/2025 - 10:48


From anarchistnews.org - We create the anarchy we want in the world via This RSS Feed.

 

The streamer Asmongold is one of the most wretched people on the planet. He’s also an incredibly popular streamer on the American right, with his video uploads receiving more than a hundred million views a month on YouTube.

As someone who seemingly fell into politics accidentally, Asmongold is more of a follower than a leader when it comes to political trends. This suggests he’s seen the way the tide is turning on the American right, and he’s decided his continued support for Israel will be bad for business:

Asmongold is backtracking his support for Trump and Israel as their approval nosedives.

Despite a year of daily praise, Asmongold now claims he never trusted Trump.

And he says protesting Israel is "America first" despite prior calls for protesters to be jailed and deported. pic.twitter.com/4nper1dvsQ

— Disinformation Tracker (@Disinfo_Tracker) December 20, 2025

Asmongold the wretch

When we say Asmongold is wretched, there are two points which best sum this up. The first is the squalor he chooses to live in:

Asmongold must be a multi-millionaire given his success, so he could pay for an army of cleaners to tend to this. The fact that he doesn’t suggests one of two things:

  • He loves it.
  • He’s realised he can better attract unwashed followers by presenting himself as the king of the shut-ins.

The second point is the ‘rat alarm clock’, which was… unique.

In his own words:

I’ve had many dead rats in the house, but there was a dead rat in the house… I use the dead rat as an alarm clock, because basically I live in Texas. It gets really hot in Texas, and whenever it would get really hot… the house would get hotter, and it would like cook the corpse of the rat, and it would make it smell worse.

So like I would wake up every morning at like 7:30 or 8:00 am.

Like I was ready to fucking go because the first thing that happened is I’d smell that goddamn rat. You know what the fuck? Yeah, this is a, that’s what, it’s a natural alarm. Yeah, free alarm clock.

To reiterate, this man is one of the most popular right-wing influencers in the world.

You’ve heard of Ben Shapiro? Asmongold gets five times as many views as him on YouTube.

You’ve heard of Steven Crowder? Asmongold gets more than ten times as many views on a good month.

Even Candace Owens gets fewer views than Asmongold, and she’s on an absolutely stratospheric rise to prominence at the moment.

Dead rat and all – whether any of us like it or not – this is an influential figure in the world.

“Based”

In the video at the top, Disinformation Tracker shows a recent clip from the Embassy of Israel in which a speaker is talking about how they’ve named and shamed “antisemites”. Asmongold suggests they’ve done this through “maliciously edited clips”. He further says that anyone who considers themselves part of the ‘America First’ movement should see their inclusion on such a list as a qualification for office.

For clarity, America First is spearhead by the Nazi Nick Fuentes:

🚨 Nick Fuentes just nukes Vivek Ramaswamy: “You can go back to India.”

Pack your bags, curry boy, and go back to India! America first, no apologies! 🇺🇸🦅 pic.twitter.com/aNStwVuxU2

— America First (@AFpumpfun) December 20, 2025

Nick Fuentes explains the main challenge to America First is organized jеwry.

“What I would like is for the US government to not be influenced by these foreign allegiances.” pic.twitter.com/Ma0LFpvbG1

— S.clips (@whitesocksclips) October 28, 2025

Now that you’re seeing phrases like ‘organised Jewry’ flying around, you’re probably starting to suspect these lads don’t oppose Israel because of the Palestinian genocide. Clearly there is actual antisemitism at play here.

America’s support for Israel has always been based on the US’s interests in the Middle East. Successive Israeli politicians have pushed what they can get away with, however, by influencing Western politicians to support them before their own country:

Ted Cruz says: “I came into Congress to serve Israel and I work every day to do that.” pic.twitter.com/qPhaAklhzb

— Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) December 7, 2025

Of course this would backfire.

Of course people would begin to ask ‘what the fuck is going on here?

Tucker Carlson blasted US leaders for letting Israel dictate American policy, saying Netanyahu brags about controlling Trump and the US, and called it humiliating that Americans are being forced into harmful decisions for another country.

Carlson said the “humiliation ritual” pic.twitter.com/Acjq2IDtXF

— Irlandarra (@aldamu_jo) October 4, 2025

Depraved new world

The MAGA movement is clearly coming to an end, because Donald Trump is decomposing before our eyes, and there’s no one who can fill his oddly proportioned shoes:

OMG Trump looks like total shit. If you ask me, it is a wonder that this guy is still even alive. pic.twitter.com/vzyo3UqXsa

— Brendan Boyd (@vbboyd) December 3, 2025

Everyone on the right knows there will be a vacuum, and to fill it they need to differentiate themselves from their rivals. Becoming anti-Israel is an obvious position to take, because anti-Israel sentiment is now the normal position:

While a super majority of Americans oppose U.S. financial support for Israel, by 9 points they favor recognition of a Palestinian state https://t.co/TF5y8ik1pJ pic.twitter.com/fKeTmkoq48

— Brian Tashman (@briantashman) December 20, 2025

Try as they might, we’re not sure the Zionists can smear Asmongold given that he is essentially a human smear. We’ll call him out if he’s antisemitic, but other than that he’s a problem for Israel’s propagandists to deal with.

Featured image via screengrab

By Willem Moore


From Canary via This RSS Feed.

 
The following piece is a guest article from Mogamat Reederwan Craayenstein, a hero of the South African anti-apartheid struggle and former political prisoner who now lives in the UK and continues his fight against racism and discrimination everywhere.

A Palestine Action detainee on hunger strike calls for assistance. The hunger striker grasps her chest and asks for an ambulance to take her to the hospital. The nurse arrives and scolds the detainee, saying that the detainee is in prison and cannot decide when to call an ambulance or go to the hospital. The nurse is the ‘responsible medical officer’, she insists, and she is the one who decides on matters of medical treatment. She performs an ECG and promises to be back in ten minutes. Many hours later, the detainee is taken by ambulance, and the staff are overheard saying something troubling about the ECG.

This reminds me of the Irish hunger strikers in the H-Blocks, prisoners at Guantanamo Bay, detainees at Bagram base in Afghanistan, Abu Ghraib, Iraq, in 2003, kidnapped people subject to extraordinary rendition and held in black holes sites all across the world during the so-called war on terror, and the Nazi Holocaust. I am also reminded of Palestinian detainees without trial and other prisoners released from Israeli jails.

The Palestine Action hunger strikers are demanding the right to bail, an end to the conscription of Palestine Action, and the freedom to communicate with their lawyers and families. They are accused of taking action against an arms manufacturer that is shipping weapons to an Apartheid regime that is also committing genocide.

The hunger strikers are Qesser Zurah, Amu Gib, Heba Muraisi, Teuta Hoxha, Kamran Ahmed and Lewie Chiaramello. Jon Cink and Muhammed Ummer Khalid ended their strike this week.

Some of the hunger strikers are now approaching 50 days without food. Bobby Sands from the Irish Republican Army died in 1981 after 66 days. The prison officials who are keeping them in detention until their next court appearance are coming down on the wrong side of a serious conflict of interest. Medical professionals, even if employed by the prison service, have a professional duty to ensure that they “do no harm”. Politicians also: they are supposed to hold the Secretary of State, the responsible political officer, to account. Few are.

Unfortunately, we see clearly how elected officials, responsible prison governors, and medical professionals lose sight of their moral responsibilities. These hunger strikers are putting their lives on the line in defence of a people who are being genocidally wiped off the map and ethnically cleansed from their land. Our government is complicit in these war crimes and crimes against humanity.

Lawyers for the detainees, who have already been in prison without trial for eighteen months and face months or years more before their court dates, have been joined by human rights organisations in their appeals to the Secretary of State for Justice and the Prime Minister to intervene to ensure that their human rights are upheld, that their treatment in detention complies with the law and is humane.

I recall Mrs Thatcher’s response. Deafening silence. In South Africa the Cabinet Minister of State for Justice, Jimmy Kruger, said that the death of Steve Biko in detention left him cold and unmoved. Starmer and Lammy say that Nelson Mandela is their hero, yet exhibit the same lack of humanity.

In the 1980s, the IRA hunger strikers were all over the news. The same media are silent about the Palestine Action hunger strikers. This is a systemic moral collapse. These are not independent media fulfilling a democratic function, but collaborators in injustice. The media are manufacturing the silence around both the hunger-strikers and the Apartheid and genocide inflicted upon the people of Gaza that they are committed to resisting. These media do not deserve the right to journalistic freedom. Their silence is complicity in the inhumane treatment of the hunger strikers. The reason is clear. The arms manufacturer is Israeli. The Apartheid and genocidal regime is Israel.

I come from apartheid South Africa. I owe the anti-apartheid solidarity movement a debt I can never repay. My writing on this matter is an attempt to repay it in part.

South African government ministers, prison wardens and medical professionals collaborated in Apartheid detention without trial and in the torture of prisoners and detainees, just because the prisoners dared to say that the Apartheid emperor had no clothes.

When an activist engages in non-violent action to oppose a genocide, that activist is doing what one’s human nature and innate moral compass dictate, even before what national and international law dictates. If an arms manufacturer was to put weapons in the hands of someone who commits systematic cruelty to animals, that arms manufacturer would be shut down and prosecuted. These activists are on hunger strike to defend a people subject to crimes against humanity and war crimes. The arms manufacturer they disrupted supplies weapons used to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity.

We have seen that there is a consensus, among the public, international institutions like the UN and experts in international law, that the government is overreaching in seeking to ban this direct action solidarity group. Thousands of older people who have seen the fight against fascism and racism are amongst those opposed to this ban. The government is persecuting them too.

I do not blame Keir Starmer, David Lammy, and Shabana Mahmood for not knowing anything about those struggles. It is breath-taking that many people who spoke about the marches against the fascists, the battle of Cable Street, etc, are now mumbling not a word. Ultimately, the country against which these hunger strikers are taking a stand is Israel. Taking a stand against Israeli Apartheid and genocide is a moral imperative but a bad career move. It is also bad for your bank balance.

The UK often regards itself as one of the most humane societies in the world. There was a time when Keir Starmer himself was a human rights lawyer. He even called for Israel to be kicked out of FIFA. David Lammy, oh dear. I thought he was a lawyer trained at Harvard.

When Steve Biko died in detention, the Labour Party in the UK was outraged. Labour party MPs used Early Day Motions to debate the evil of the South African apartheid regime, condemned the torture of Steve Biko, and demanded consequences for his murder in detention. In apartheid South Africa, more than 40 people died in detention. Labour Party members were active in the Anti-Apartheid Movement in the UK. Trafalgar Square was a constant site for demonstrations opposite the South African High Commission across the road. In the black anti-racism struggles in the UK, Sivanandan used to say that what the Tories debate the Labour Party legislates.

I pray that the hunger strikers do not die in prison. However, I come from a political tradition that says, “If you see something that is wrong, then change it with your hands.” The hunger strikers tried to do exactly that when they disrupted the operations of the arms manufacturer.

The tradition also says that if you cannot do that, then speak out against the wrong. The hunger strikers and the demonstrators in defence of Palestine Action have done exactly that. Hundreds have been arrested for opposing this sordid proscription. The tradition consists of saying that if you cannot even do that, then at least pray in your heart. Many are doing this. Thought crimes legislation is also in the making to target even that.

This issue is not even about the dire situation of the hunger strikers. This government is complicit with the Israeli apartheid and genocidal regime that is starving Palestinians to death in Gaza. I hope the hunger strikers do not die. However unlikely it may seem, perhaps the prison officials, Lammy, Starmer and the medical professionals will find a moral compass that works.

If the activists were to die in prison, as an activist I know that if you cannot defeat your enemy, then shame him. Their blood will be on Starmer, Lammy, the prison wardens, the medical professionals and the MPs who kept their heads down and would not even start a conversation – not just about the hunger strikers but about Israel and its war crimes and crimes against humanity. The hunger strikers are a symbol of our spiritual and moral collapse.

In post-Apartheid South Africa, those responsible for the deaths of detainees in Apartheid prisons are now being pursued, half a century or more later. Those of us who are trying to intervene should also build the record. We must seek justice for the hunger strikers before the guilty die. Starmer, Lammy, Mahmood, the prison wardens and the medical professionals we must compile the dossiers and pursue justice as we try to urgently build the movement to intervene on behalf of the hunger strikers.

Featured image via the Canary

By Skwawkbox


From Canary via This RSS Feed.

 

Lee en español aquí

On December 14, the predictable happened: José Antonio Kast, the candidate of the far-right Republican Party, prevailed over Jeannette Jara of the Communist Party of Chile by 58.16% to 41.84%. Kast ran as the candidate of the Cambio por Chile (Change for Chile) platform and was backed by all the parties of the traditional right and the center-right. Jara, on the other hand, was the candidate of Unidad por Chile (Unity for Chile), which comprised the parties of the center-left, including the bloc of Chile’s current president, Gabriel Boric, the Frente Amplio or Broad Front.

In the first round of the election, Jara had been the lead candidate with 26.58% of the vote, while Kast won 23.92%. But this was misleading. The two right-wing candidates who immediately endorsed Kast, Johannes Kaiser (with 13.94%) and Evelyn Matthei (with 12.46%), provided him with an arithmetical advantage of 50.32%. The question for Jara was whether she could surpass 30%. That she ended up with over 40% is itself a remarkable achievement. It is not easy for the Chilean population, marinated in anti-communism for several generations (particularly during the military dictatorship from 1973 to 1990), to consider voting a Communist into the presidential palace, even if her opponent is a man of the extreme right.

Kast’s arrival in La Moneda, the presidential palace, is part of the Angry Tide that has been sweeping Latin America from El Salvador to Argentina. His victory is not entirely unique. It follows the collapse of the liberal agenda that tried to maintain rigid economic austerity policies alongside limited social programs; and it is the result of the left’s failure to build a strong agenda to fulfill the demands of the social uprisings that have punctually erupted against austerity and hierarchy.

Read More: Vote count continues in Honduras but either way, the right wing triumphs

The child of the dictatorship

José Antonio Kast is a product of Chile’s long shadow, where the unresolved legacies of the military dictatorship seep into the present. Born in 1966 to a German immigrant family, Kast emerged from the conservative heartlands of Chilean politics, first as a member of the Independent Democratic Union, the party most faithfully aligned with Augusto Pinochet’s project. His political formation is inseparable from that history: an unrepentant defense of the neoliberal order imposed by force and a moral authoritarianism dressed up as “tradition”.

Kast’s father (Michael Martin Kast Schindele) served in the Wehrmacht (the German army) and was a member of the Nazi Party. After Germany’s defeat, Michael Kast fled Allied custody in Italy, returned to Bavaria, then escaped the postwar denazification process and emigrated to Argentina and then Chile via the Vatican’s ratlines. In Santiago in 1950, Kast started a sausage company and built a fortune. His elder son, Miguel Kast (a “Chicago Boy”) served as Minister of Labor and president of the Central Bank under the military government of General Augusto Pinochet. The entire family supported Pinochet. When asked about Pinochet by La Tercera in 2017, José Antonio Kast said, “I defended his government, but I never even had a coffee with him. You don’t have to be very imaginative to think that if he were alive, he would vote for me. Now, if I had met with him, we would have had a cup of tea at La Moneda”.

Kast cannot be held responsible for his father. He has said that Nazism is an ideology with which he disagrees, and one should take him at his word. On the other hand, the easy facility with which he embraces Pinochet’s military dictatorship should give one pause. During the social uprising in Chile in 2019, Kast reinvented himself as the defender of the ordinary Chilean against migrants, feminists, socialists, communists, and Mapuche demands against the cruel social order. Kast borrowed from the global far right: law-and-order fantasies, nostalgia for old hierarchies of race and gender, and a ruthless contempt for social movements that dare to challenge entrenched inequality.

What makes Kast dangerous is not his originality, for there is nothing original about his ideas or his place in society. It is his familiarity that is dangerous. Despite the end of the military dictatorship thirty-five years ago, the structures set in place by Pinochet remain. This includes the Constitution of 1980, which now appears eternal because two attempts to revise it (in 2022 and 2023) failed. Crucially, Chile’s reality includes property relations reorganized during the dictatorship to favor the oligarchy, including Pinochet’s own relatives. During the dictatorship, Pinochet privatized one of the major mining companies, Sociedad Química y Minera (SQM), which was taken over by Pinochet’s son-in-law, Julio Ponce Lerou, (then married to Pinochet’s daughter Verónica). This sort of dictatorship-driven piracy remained intact after the dictatorship ended (Pinochet’s granddaughter now runs the company).

These features of the oligarchy and its Pinochet-era consolidation are crucial to Kast’s prominence and rise. He speaks a language long used in Chile to justify this inequality: that markets are sacred, that discipline is virtue, and that memory must be silenced. In moments of crisis, figures like Kast do not arise by accident. They are summoned by elites when democracy threatens to become too democratic, when the people begin to ask for dignity rather than permission. He will be sworn in on March 11, 2026.

Will Chile rise again?

A massive social uprising that began in October 2019 brought together many sections of Chile’s society that had felt the hard edge of neoliberal austerity. This was not a spontaneous rebellion, but the product of decades of accumulated grievances rooted in inequality, privatization, and social humiliation, grievances that had long been contested by various social forces organized into movements and platforms. That protest led to the victory of the center-left’s Gabriel Boric in 2021, but Boric’s government was simply unable to break with the consensus and provide the country with a new agenda for new times. It was almost a caretaker government from one right-wing president (Sebastián Piñera, 2010-2014 and 2018-2022) to another. The streets are calmer now than they were in 2019, but the structural conditions that produced that uprising have not been dismantled.

When I met Boric before he took office, he was certain that his government would be able to reform the pension system and perhaps address the healthcare, education, and housing crises. Nothing was really achieved, and even constitutional reform failed. With the promise of social mobility no longer available to the population, particularly the youth, discontent rose. The center-left lost its legitimacy, and that discontent turned to disillusionment once again. There is a widespread sense of political exhaustion and betrayal. Institutions appear incapable of translating popular demands into real change, reinforcing the idea that voting (even if compulsory) cannot inaugurate a new world. This demoralization is a real social force, one that led a large section of Jara’s voters to vote to block Kast rather than to vote for Jara with enthusiasm.

Chile’s median age is 38. Many young Chileans entered adulthood amid the social uprising over the past decade, then a pandemic, and finally what appears to be permanent inflation. With the failure to ratify a new Constitution and with the victory of Kast, this young Chilean voice for a different future is certainly going to feel muted. But it will not remain silenced for long. It will have to come to terms with Kast’s horrendous program: the continued militarization of the Mapuche territory in the south, the criminalization of protest, and the expansion of a state that prepares for containment, not redistribution. Kast’s agenda will not eliminate unrest but may postpone it for a while, only to sharpen its eventual return to the streets. When Kast sends the police to beat the protestors, his followers will undoubtedly take refuge in the language of legality, while his opponents will speak of the regime’s illegitimacy. If Kast cannot deliver policies to contain inflation and unemployment, inequality will rise and produce its own fury.

If a new social uprising does form, what will be its core issue? And will those who lead it be able to generate a credible political project capable of channeling that anger toward transformation? If there is no such project, a repeat of 2019 might move from explosion to disappointment and then to utter dejection. It will be up to Jara and others around her to craft an agenda to defend citizens’ constitutional rights against the Kast government and then to shape a project that is credible and desirable. The social uprising of 2019 is not a closed chapter; it is an unfinished sentence. Within that unfinished sentence were the Boric years (2022-2026), a delay more than anything. Dignity remains the demand. It may reassert itself, but only when patience runs out again.

Vijay Prashad is an Indian historian, editor, and journalist. He is a writing fellow and chief correspondent at Globetrotter. He is an editor of LeftWord Books and the director of Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research. He has written more than 20 books, including The Darker Nations and The Poorer Nations. His latest books are On Cuba: Reflections on 70 Years of Revolution and Struggle (with Noam Chomsky), Struggle Makes Us Human: Learning from Movements for Socialism, and (also with Noam Chomsky) The Withdrawal: Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, and the Fragility of US Power. Chelwa and Prashad will publish How the International Monetary Fund is Suffocating Africa later this year with Inkani Books.

This article was produced byGlobetrotter.

The post The Angry Tide has washed into Chile appeared first on Peoples Dispatch.


From Peoples Dispatch via This RSS Feed.

view more: ‹ prev next ›