Stardoot
rotopenguin
joined 2 years ago
The xz attack was not a clown show. It's a well orchestrated attack, with a lot of clever techniques to slip a payload into something that is supposed to be fully open and readable source code. Somebody recognized a difference between what people think ssh&systemd's dependency graph looks like, and what it actually was. Fuckery went into disabling some technical defenses (a single dot was snuck into an autoconf file! Try to find it.) and SE went into disabling others. The best malware reversers in the world have been shooting caffeine into their eyeballs for 2 days, trying to make sense of latter-stage payloads.
This attack was damn good. They either got unlucky, or there is a small possibility that our spies out-spied them and dropped the dime. Another angle is that they were running out of time - systemd developers were getting nervous about their own surface area and were working to cut that back. The attacker took the chance on running their play before it was fully bulletproofed, because it was in greater danger of becoming an obsolete exploit.
"Oh, did I need to rebuild the initrd too? Shhheeeeit, can I do that in a chroot from a livedisk or something?"
apt info xz-utils
Your version is old as balls. Even if you were on Mantic, it would still be old as balls.
We are well into the age of "OEMs dgaf if S3 works". Windows has not used it since sometime around 7, so it's been bitrotting in every vendor's firmware. With some models, you may have S3 working on day one, but a firmware update kills it and that's too bad.
S0ix idle is actually quite nice when you get it working, but when it is not the tools to diagnose it are terrible. The terminology around sleep states are also terrible, (what's a package or core or platform C state? Could one of them find a different letter?). I have gone over the arch wiki, and DELETED Intel documents so many times…
DiLinux. You drop a bunch of files in a fat16 folder, and run a chainloader that chestbursts out of DOS. It used the umsdos filesystem, which was a short-lived thing that lived on FAT and scribed all of the other needed fs features into bonus hidden files.
I don't think that you're losing any power with the "usb ports powered" option on. It's just there if you want to use your (sleeping) laptop as a $1000 power bank to charge your phone.
Personally, I turn it off just because I would rather use a $20 battery pack instead of wearing out my laptop.
You're right, the post should have been nothing but a link to X
The more EA adds "in-kernel rootkits" to their games, the more powerful Linux becomes.
Hey, at least my feelings are accurate
That sounds a lot nicer than the jav ascript garbage colle ction nightmar e that is gnome-m utter / gjs