roguetrick
he is accused of unlawfully using a Taser on a suspect without allowing them time to comply with verbal commands
It should be unlawful to use a Taser for failure to comply period unless someone's actively resisting or running. Tasing people as a compliance tool because you're impatient is fucking nonsense.
I'm a nurse, I deal with people who are altered, scared out of their minds and at times violent regularly. I very rarely have to use physical force (and if I do I wait for the amount of folks I need) and never have to call someone for a fucking Taser for compliance.
Ahem, that's a crescent kick. It's kind of the bitch slap of kicks.
He looks so smooth. 5 year survival for that is pretty good, and at his age he'll likely make a good run of it.
He lived in Polish Ukraine at the time. Still not excusing fighting for the Nazis.
If this idiocy was accepted, screen readers would be outlawed.
It decays in like 40 minutes or something back into mercury. If you do it again you get a whole 2 days before, you guessed it, straight to mercury. We have the best elements in the world thanks to mercury.
21 minute half life beta decay back to mercury.
Oh for sure, I'm a nurse. Heavy water/tritated water is cytotoxic like a chemotherapy drug however, vs just messing up your osmotic balance. Your proteins conformiational structure from hydrogen bonds can't function correctly with it and you can't replicate your DNA/RNA because of the difference in size of the hydrogen and your cells die. Starts with diarrhea, ends with death. You need like a 20% proportion of it to see those effects though, so like I said, truly ridiculous amounts of tritated water. More than the entirety that they're releasing.
This is fascism. It uses religion as a convenient part of their "culturally pure" state ideology. It's a more basic sociological ingroup/outgroup reaction than anything to do with religion. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindutva
The definition and the use of Hindutva and its relationship with Hinduism has been a part of several court cases in India. In 1966, the Chief Justice Gajendragadkar wrote for the Supreme Court of India in Yagnapurushdasji (AIR 1966 SC 1127), that "Hinduism is impossible to define".[30][b] The court adopted Radhakrishnan's submission that Hinduism is complex and "the theist and atheist, the sceptic and agnostic, may all be Hindus if they accept the Hindu system of culture and life".