Holy shit it's the old "we improved the land" argument from the trail of tears in the wild. So did you vote for Jackson or did he just win you over after he fucked the Cherokees?
roguetrick
joined 2 years ago
I don't really care. You called the poster stupid, then misrepresented his argument while quoting him. It's entertainingly incompetent.
or influenced relations with its neighbors
If you're going to start a pedantic argument on the ass end of the fediverse for an article nobody's really going to read, at least ensure that you're actually being correctly pedantic.
Yugoslav style socialist state based on the shared identity of the levantine people and their continual exploitation by outside interests. If it didn't work in the Balkans, surely it'll work in the levant right?
Chesebro needed to take the deal, his case was fucked after that last dismissal was denied.
“We have this chicken or egg scenario between suboptimal sleep duration and depression. They frequently co-occur, but which comes first is largely unresolved. Using genetic susceptibility to disease we determined that sleep likely precedes depressive symptoms, rather than the inverse,”
I don't agree with this position. They may have proven sleep disregulation can be a prodromal symptom but I highly doubt it's causitive.
Do folks think we're bottling cow farts? Wood gas is about the only non fossil gas we use (though sewer gas lamps still exist I think.)
Weren't a few of them outright begging for people to not cling to political parties?
For the most part they were stupid to do so. Coalition building is independent of even government system. Look at the political parties behind the Nikea riots during the reign of Emperor Justinian. The truth is you could have sortition form the legislative branch and they would STILL develop political parties.
I'm sure their social media managers are acting more on fear of losing employees than fear of missing out.
It's hard to argue that switching to some platform they're not familiar with and will likely have even less of an impact still continue to justify their employment.
If you're threatened by West you're already preparing your arguments for losing. He will have zero appreciable impact on the results.
If you're mad at him existing because he forces your candidate to address things he's weak on, that's just a poor coping mechanism for having a weak candidate.
Edit: to be clear, I'm not a West supporter, but I strongly want social justice Christians to start waking up and participating in the political process and he is very useful for that
You seem to have a hard time grasping points in general. I never cared about your or his points about this topic. I think I made that pretty clear when I described this as the ass end of the fediverse about an article nobody's going to read.
I thought your flailing pedantry was funny though.