You got it. I have no doubt that the kids were sick, but small amounts of ingested fentanyl would not make the kids sick. It was likely THC gummies. That would explain the "allergic" reaction, aka flushing. Morphine can cause itching/flushing, but not generally in low doses. THC certainly does cause flushing though in high doses particularly in children, like you'd see with edibles.
roguetrick
joined 2 years ago
There's just no grounds here. If it was bad faith, outside the power delegated, against the Constitution, sure. If it's within their power and following their rules (good faith), the court has zero place.
The idea that they're acting in bad faith because the court interprets the evidence differently than the agency put together to interpret the evidence is a ridiculous argument.
Second Sight’s long-term plan was always to pivot to a brain implant that would bypass the eye altogether and directly stimulate the visual cortex.
The number of blind folks who are receptive to electrical retinal stimulation was always too small for this business model. These crooks knew that and pumped investors for a non existent hope that this would somehow translate into a non existent technology. Suprise suprise, you can't magic your way into these things.
The entire operation was always doomed to turn out this way.
SPS became desperate and Googled “Polish hackers” and came across a group called Dragon Sector, a reverse-engineering team made up of white hat hackers.
Hilarious. I hope 404 continues with this level of high quality journalism.
Dragon sector, who they hired, is a security capture the flag team.
Edit: Socials of those who worked on it
https://social.hackerspace.pl/@q3k
https://infosec.exchange/@mrtick
https://infosec.exchange/@redford
The entire situation is top down nonsense, so hopefully the court sees it as such. Regulatory changes made in good faith is exactly what the FDA is empowered by Congress to do. It's up to Congress to decide if they're acting outside of their scope, not the courts.
What's easier to understand: ankle anatomy or Ubuntu publishing.
You'd think Bibi would've made it clear enough with this latest fiasco that clinging to a jingoist ideology is generally the opposite of safety.
This should not be an interlocutory appeal. Anybody else would have to wait for the final decision for this. Can any lawyer explain why they're granting this appeal?
Ah Portuguese. My Spanish proficiency is low enough.
Username checks out. Also maybe naranjaduct?
There are a lot of peaks named Sugarloaf mountain. This one is in Texas.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mountains_named_Sugarloaf
California has 5 alone.