roguetrick

joined 2 years ago
[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 23 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (20 children)

Fucking nuts. There was NEVER a reasonable reason to detain him. Crashing into someone's house does not give you reasonable suspicion for an investigation. That's not how it fucking works. I don't understand why the prosecutor would even want to touch these bullshit charges.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It's not a lot of it and isolating it is more trouble than it's worth. It's easier to just create a lithium channel that creates it when it's neutron activated. That or isolating it from a heavy water reactor, since that produces a whole lot more.

Tritium isn't scarce, in that we really can create it pretty easily. Lithium-6 is available to do so if needed. (https://isotope.com/en-us/lithium-6-metal-li-95-pct-llm--827--pk). It's jut not economical to produce for most purposes.

Edit: Also, it's not tritium in the regolith but He3, which is theorized as an aneutronic (thus much cleaner and not creating a bunch of neutron activation waste like tritium fusion would create) fusion fuel but nobody's really achieved fusion with it. Tritium would've decayed if it was in the regolith.

When you let tritium decay, it creates He3.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Should add more bands higher. I honestly think 90% gets very reasonable at a certain point. The marginal utility of the added income they're making already makes very little difference to them. They're just doing it to accumulate more at that point.

Edit: To be clear, I don't think that point should even be hit by small business owners or specialists. Pretty much only those that live on rents and CEOs should get there.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Molten Salt reactors are great at recycling spent uranium and don’t really cause pollution. If anything they reduce pollution because they create less nuclear garbage.

If it was that big of a problem folks would be doing PUREX reprocessing with all nuclear fuel. Not a clean process, but reduces the overall mass problem you have with spent fuel rods. No matter what you do, you just can't burn off the fission products that last forever and ever. You can put them in a container the size of a coffee can that still emits a similar amount of radiation as a whole rod if you want, but I'm not sure I see the utility. They just take those and vitrify them to make them bigger to take advantage of the inverse square law and make them safer to handle.

As long as uranium stays cheap, neither reprocessing, breeders, or reactors that eat the plutonium they produce really makes sense. You still need a similar site to store the waste regardless. As it stands I don't think we'll see uranium being a significant part of running a reactor in the foreseeable future. (As long as you're not a nuclear weapons state that doesn't have a robust fuel enrichment program, like India).

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I wonder what they’ll make the coolant loops out of: steel glows at 900 deg Freedom

That's always been the problem with the reactors. High heat, corrosion resistant, and resistant to neutron spallation is a very very tall order.

https://thebulletin.org/2022/06/molten-salt-reactors-were-trouble-in-the-1960s-and-they-remain-trouble-today/

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 53 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

If you can work it properly, molten salt reactors are MUCH safer and more efficient, because the waste heat from fission products cannot cause a problem with something cooled through convection and conduction of a molten salt. You can't really have a destructive meltdown when the coolant doesn't care if the fuel melts. The problem is, most previous attempts ended up with the reactor catching on fire. Not a dangerous fire, exactly, but generally not the outcome you're looking for.

On the waste front, neutron activation of water produces tritium at worst, which you dispose of by putting it into a bigger body of water. Neutron activation of the molten salt coolant can be more difficult to dispose of, but it's not exactly a major problem.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

When I stopped over there, it looked like reddit is running some sort of suggestion algorithm like youtube for posts. It mostly seems to be promoting right wing outrage bait. We might not have videos but I'm very happy not being subjected to that shit anymore from some of the more popular video/gif subs. It's strange they'd want to lean into it further. Baiting engagement that way will just degrade your ability to host interesting conversations and continue being the top result for many questions on google.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago

It's how they do with deer, I'm sure it would work on a moose. Bite and run bite and run.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 6 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Pope isn't acting in an "infalliable" role with this statement, unfortunately.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 50 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Two of Trump's experts in particular, Jason Flemmons and Eli Bartov, argued that valuations are inherently subjective, and Engoron sharply criticized their testimony exculpating Trump, his family members and business associates of wrongdoing.

"Bartov is a tenured professor, but all that his testimony proves is that for a million or so dollars, some experts will say whatever you want them to say," Engoron wrote.

A research professor at New York University's Stern School of Business, Bartov conceded that he billed nearly $877,500 to Trump for his testimony, and he said that money came from the Trump Organization and Save America PAC, the former president's primary fundraising vehicle.

But Engoron said that Bartov "lost all credibility" by claiming Trump's financial statements were accurate in every respect, even though a pre-trial ruling established the "numerous obvious errors" that they had.

This shit is the exact problem with our adversarial expert witness system. This should not happen in a court.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social -1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Once a week is a hard sell, really. I couldn't even pull that off in high school.

view more: ‹ prev next ›