roguetrick

Make me some stroopwafel.

None of the above. New colonists were randomly generated by the environment for a 28 year simulation.

used data from past endeavors, such as questionnaires filled out by groups aboard the International Space Station or those living in close quarters in the Arctic for months at a time. They also attempted to factor in known character traits such as resilience to stress, social skills and degree of neuroticism.

Wat? Is this a probilistic study on psychological issues? Did they just put a bunch of traits in Rimworld and see who would break?

Edit: I read the study, it's not far off. Part of the sim was "mining minerals to be sent to earth." We will never pull minerals out of the martian gravity well just to drop them into the earth one. That's just dumb.

the global variables set the skill levels necessary for settlement pro-
duction functions. An assumed score of 100 is needed across two sets of skills (-s1
and -s2) to successfully accomplish each of four tasks (food, water, air produc-
tion, and accident recovery). Each pair of scores related to resource production
is set with the same values. For example, food-s1 is set as a random integer
between 0 and 100. Food-s2 is set as the difference between 100 and food-s1
(100 - food-s1). Accident recovery sets both both accident-s1 and accident-s2 as
a random integer from 0 to 100. This represents the ex ante uncertainty about
what types of skills may be needed for a given emergency. It is important to
remember that these values set the required skill score that must be met for
successful production; they do not guarantee that settlers will have these skills.
Settler Variables. Settlers are assigned two skills. Skill 1 is set as a random
number from 0 to 100. Skill 2 is set as 100 - Skill 1, such that each settler
has a total skill level of 100. Settlers have a partner variable (all settlers begin
unpartnered) and indicator variables that store their task assignment.
Each settler is created with one of four resilience types: nuerotic, reactive,
13
social, and agreeable.

It's like a stupid rimworld

I don't see the point. It's general company policy to refuse to recognize a majority by default and managers are always trained as such regardless of "good faith". This doesn't change that, it just penalizes the company acting in bad faith if they get caught (several times) and makes them file some paperwork, which doesn't change anything.

I'd hope that's not the case, because that sounds like it would be a mistrial on appeal.

Edit: they don't need to provide one for a bail hearing I don't think

You're preaching to the choir. I haven't used AC all summer in the mid Atlantic. Even a poor fan will circulate cold air higher and hot air lower off you are using climate controls.

To be clear, kidneys need steady and high blood pressure to continue functioning. So let's say you have a heart attack, then your able to recover circulation but your brain was hypoxic and you're later shown to be brain dead. In that case there's also a high chance to be in some state of kidney failure and needing dialysis.

They don't. The most important consideration is will the person take care of the donated organ and will the donation have an impact.

Yeah, my greater point is hopefully having it makes them use it.

From selling them to home remodelers and knowing that people will go to great lengths to maintain a specific style of decor.

I honestly don't tend to argue metaethics because I'm largely ignorant, so the legislature could really be based on whatever. Maybe it's better to say even a consequentialist view would favor using dentological ethics in the judiciary since that's the only way a judiciary would work in the long run. Maybe the same with utilitarian.

Read his statements on the article. He doubled and tripled down. Played the victim. He's a man in a position of authority who believes his own perspective is more important than sexually harassing his employees. It's unacceptable.