You shouldn't, it's short and interesting
robinm
joined 2 years ago
I have a non-breaking space on my layout since 10 years, and a friend recently added a non-breaking hyphen to his. Appart from search that doesn't do automatic conversion I didn't noticed issues.
Looks nice. It has a very good “wooow” effect
I would have liked a link to the LKLM thread. Usually they are quite informative
I use a 42 key layout modified from bépo (french dvorak inspired layout) with the altgr layer of ergol. Go check this altgr layer it's awesome for programming, and there is a version compatible for qwerty and lafayette.
╭╌╌╌╌╌┰─────┬─────┬─────┬─────┬─────┰─────┬─────┬─────┬─────┬─────┰╌╌╌╌╌┬╌╌╌╌╌╮
┆ ┃ ¹ │ ² │ ³ │ ⁴ │ ⁵ ┃ ⁶ │ ⁷ │ ⁸ │ ⁹ │ ⁰ ┃ ┆ ┆
┆ ┃ ₁ │ ₂ │ ₃ │ ₄ │ ₅ ┃ ₆ │ ₇ │ ₈ │ ₉ │ ₀ ┃ ┆ ┆
╰╌╌╌╌╌╂─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────╂─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────╂╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌┤
· ┃ │ ≤ │ ≥ │ *¤ │ ‰ ┃ *^ │ │ × │ *´ │ *` ┃ ┆ ┆
· ┃ @ │ < │ > │ $ │ % ┃ ^ │ & │ * │ ' │ ` ┃ ┆ ┆
· ┠─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────╂─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────╂╌╌╌╌╌┼╌╌╌╌╌┤
· ┃ │ ⁽ │ ⁾ │ │ ≠ ┃ */ │ ± │ — │ ÷ │ *¨ ┃ ┆ ┆
· ┃ { │ ( │ ) │ } │ = ┃ \ │ + │ - │ / │ " ┃ ┆ ┆
╭╌╌╌╌╌╂─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────╂─────┼─────┼─────┼─────┼─────╂╌╌╌╌╌┴╌╌╌╌╌╯
┆ ┃ *~ │ │ │ – │ ┃ ¦ │ ¬ │ *¸ │ │ ┃ ·
┆ ┃ ~ │ [ │ ] │ _ │ # ┃ | │ ! │ ; │ : │ ? ┃ ·
╰╌╌╌╌╌┸─────┴─────┴─────┴─────┴─────┸─────┴─────┴─────┴─────┴─────┚ · · · · · ·
Yeah, this make sence
It's also what I understood from what I read but I assume it was just a poor choice of word. Debug symbols are way too important for debugging to be stripped by default.
That's only a summary of the introduction! The full story is much more interesting
That's a really good explanation. I would just add that I find easier to search for orphans with git log --graph --reflog than using `git reflog directly, especially if it's one of the top entries in the reflog.
vim can have IDE-like capabilities thanks to lsp and tree-sitter. That's a real game changer and is quite easy to set-up with something like kickstart.nvim.
If you have references explain why and how that it’s easier to port C to a new architecture by creating a new compiler from scratch than to either create a backend for llvm (and soon gcc) or to create a minimal wasm executor (like what zig is doing) to this new architecture I’m interested. And of course I talking about new architectures because it’s much easier to recreate something that as already be done before.
Interesting idea indeed. I've never used async yet, but I'm always surprised at how the problem space seems to be much more complicated than what it initially looks like.