rglullis

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago

Dealing with the stress of a job is completely different than the stress of some volunteer work, and "keep finding fresh job applicants" is a lot easier (and dare I say, more ethical) than "keep finding fresh volunteers".

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago

There is the co-op model. Membership on https://cosocial.ca/ requires a $50/year contribution and every member has the right to participate in discussions regarding governance. Because of the steep admission price, the instance is relatively small in size and it does not demand a lot from the people working on it.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"Joga Bonito" is a verb, not a noun. It translates to "Play it beautifully".

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago (4 children)

But I'd rather have the cleaner domain than the one with the cheat.

I do agree though that .news is not ideal. @UlrikHD@programming.dev, can you change the option for jogabonito.news to jogabonito.community ?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 months ago

Not necessarily "Lemmy matures". It could also be:

  • ActivityPub software starts supporting DID to allow migration of identities.
  • ACtivityPub adopts some ideas from nostr and turns the server into a simple message relay.

Which then could let the lemm.ee admins to bring back the server - or offer a way for users to checkout their actor keys, etc, etc...

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago

Hosting a static website is virtually free. All that static JSON is going to amount to a few gigabytes of data, you can compress to save up to an order of magnitude. I can bet you that I can store all of lemm.ee's data (and media!) on Storj for less than $20/month.

[–] rglullis@communick.news -2 points 2 months ago

Do we expect every single user to assess all of the toxic communities

No, I want users to have access to a list of pre-curated communities and let them customize it to their liking, like what Fediverser does.

In the same way that defederation is an admin-level decision impacting all of the userbase

Defederation is a bad way to manage conflict. It is a nuclear option that should be taken only when the offending instance (as a whole) is malicious. To stretch this "my server, my rules" philosophy further is bad design.

Good admins are like good janitors. They are not there to enforce behavior top-down.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Ok, I just found jogabonito.community for $35/year. I can transfer it to you at cost if you want. Let's add to the list of choices.

[–] rglullis@communick.news -1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I forgot that you are selective with your tolerance with hyperbole.

I mean features about customizing behavior ("Trump Musk filter", "Vote weighting") and the things where the data is publicly available but hidden only for admins, like "Attitude and Reputation scoring".

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You cheated by adding that o in the beginning. ;)

Let's make a deal. Put it for the vote. If it wins, I will host it for free. If it doesn't, you need to sign up for a paying plan on Communick.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 7 points 2 months ago (4 children)

It seems like every single one of those features are just settings that could (and should) be implemented client-side, and left up to the user who wants to have control over their experience.

view more: ‹ prev next ›