rglullis

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rglullis@communick.news 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There are vulnerable groups of people who have a harassment risk against them.

People that are at risk for what they write on the public internet should be protected and empowered by having better privacy tools, not by pretending that they can have a "safe space" on the public internet.

There is no such thing as privacy on the internet. The Fediverse makes it seem that it mitigates the surveillance problem by spreading the information around and not having it under the control of one single large entity, but the truth is that the Fediverse makes it actually easier for dedicated malicious actors to collect data and reach their targets.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 years ago

That's the thing: actions from other users and from the key players are not "independent". It is a social network, actions and reactions depend on the context and the relationships of everyone involved.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 3 points 2 years ago

Last I checked, the people using XMPP are still running happily using servers and clients.

All 17 of them.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 19 points 2 years ago

public timelines, enable whitelist federation and require authorized fetch for federating

And all of that can be circumvented by pulling the data via the RSS feeds or plain old scraping.

Authorized fetch and domain blocks may be effective to stop drive-by trolls, but do nothing to stop anyone with a minimal amount of resources and interest in scraping data from a social network.

The reality is simple: all information that you put on the web should be considered as publicly available. Those that want or need absolute privacy should not use information in the fediverse and resort only to provably secure communication protocols.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Why is your account marked as a bot?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 56 points 2 years ago (11 children)

The Facebook hatred is understandable and justified, but defederating with Threads is a misguided idea:

  • Federation is not required for them to be able to pull the data. Even if you block an instance, they can still pull whatever they want.
  • By closing down with Threads, you'll be basically guaranteeing that that all the millions of people that are there will never be able to migrate away.
  • By getting major (current) instances to defederate with Threads, it gets easier for Threads to just say "hey, we tried to be open but they still rejected us, so we are just going to go back to our walled garden."
[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 years ago

BluRay disks. Every year I make a backup of the really important stuff (documents, family pictures), burn two disks and give each of them to a different family member.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 8 points 2 years ago (4 children)

It's still baffling for me that none of their "budget-cloud" (Hetzner, OVH) providers have not gotten into this segment of taking open source packages and offer as a turn-key system.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 0 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Facebook didn't kill XMPP, how would they kill the existing alternatives?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I thought we were all supposed to leave Reddit. What happened with that?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 years ago

Not everyone, but it seems like a substantial part of them. Anyway, I am saying it is only wrong in the scenario where Lemmy has a more sizeable userbase.

Still, not a justification to keep the mirrors. That's why I disabled most of them.

view more: ‹ prev next ›