rglullis

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rglullis@communick.news 42 points 2 years ago (6 children)

I wrote to about a dozen journalists on Linked who loved to complain about Elon Musk on Twitter. A short paragraph saying about how Mastodon is growing and that the best way to combat Musk power would be by stripping his platform of reputable people.

Zero responses.

[–] rglullis@communick.news -4 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Slow growth is incompatible with anything that requires network effects.

And if we are talking about quality alone, then the Fediverse products are already lagging behind Bluesky and Nostr, and the current user base is so reactionary that trend will be that we'll keep losing ground.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 2 points 2 years ago

I used to have a 5-digit Slashdot ID, I am familiar with Eternal September. ;)

What I wanted to understand from OP is: what makes them think that the Fediverse (in general) in some type of enlightened vanguard that we should be "afraid" of the masses?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 1 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Can you elaborate?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 2 years ago (42 children)

If not Threads, what would you suggest to bring the billions of people who are stuck in legacy social media into the Fediverse?

If not Threads, how else can we convince small businesses to have an online presence beyond their Facebook pages?

If not Threads, how else do you want to bring mainstream media out of Twitter?

[–] rglullis@communick.news 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

missing piece is the replies, which Lemmy devs have no interest

If you look in one of the duplicate issues, nutomic says "no one has implemented it yet. Would definitely accept a PR to add it though.", so it's not a matter of "no interest", it is a matter of lacking manpower for it.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 5 points 2 years ago

Not at all. I myself have been playing with the possibility of adding support to it on Fediverser, to have a place for the mirror bots.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 63 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (10 children)

Evidence No. 3783 that "social media" and "privacy" do not mix well together.

Let me repeat one more time:

  • anything you write online should be considered public.
  • There is no "consent-based" fediverse.
  • There is no "GDPR protects me from that".
  • There is no "security through obscurity".
  • There is no "dark corner of the internet".

No matter your morals and ethical values, If you need to have any type of conversation that you think might get you in legal trouble, do not have this conversation in a public forum. Use #matrix if you have to, and even then you'd still need to worry large group chats which may have some undercover agent.

And if you are really concerned about "censorship", then ActivityPub is not for you. Go join forces with the bitcoiners and use #nostr.

[–] rglullis@communick.news 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Can you please try again? This instance was still running 0.18.5 and it seems something got screwed up in the process.

view more: ‹ prev next ›