relevants

How would they e2ee this without intercepting the messages? Also the irony of fighting against an exclusionary service by making your access tool also exclusionary ...

Grammarly has a terrible privacy policy, so you are right to be cautious. Unfortunately I don't have any good alternatives to offer as I only use spellcheck myself.

I mean, the example kinda implies that this is on a Customer type. Otherwise you'd have a method getCustomerId instead.

I'm a bit split on this. I do think in general all functions and methods should have comments describing how they behave, but I also think the standard format of Javadoc or JSDoc can look a bit redundant and silly sometimes, at least wrt getters and setters. I often see things like

/**
 * Get the customer ID.
 *
 * @return the ID of the customer
 */
public getId(): string {
    // ...
}

Now sure, you could argue that this is more of a problem with the Java-esque way of abstracting away field access than with the documentation, but sometimes there just genuinely isn't anything meaningful to add that isn't already expressed by the method name and signature. In that case, these comments add visual noise to the class and no real value. As soon as there is more logic to it than that though, I completely agree that should be documented for any caller.

I'm not sure I like it better, but I do find Kotlin's approach to this quite interesting, where parameters and return values are referenced from the description text rather than always listed separately.

That isn't what they asked! They asked about when it is tolerable to use fewer digits and at what point the loss of precision becomes a concern again. Your responses have nothing to do with that question.

There's no authority that would use a higher number of decimals

Cool, but that still doesn't answer OP's question.

The link you provided doesn't even answer the question because it only tells you what NASA uses and then what would happen if you used no decimals at all. So your answer is not only rude, but also lazy and unhelpful.

Not really? It's a programming class with automated assignment submissions and grading, I don't see a lot of overlap with Lemmy's feature set for the kind of thing I'm doing.

The community is called "No Stupid Questions", maybe you could adjust the tone of your answer accordingly.

Are you aware where you are posting this? Do you think advertising NFTs here will be a viable marketing strategy?

You can also just use the "Following" feed instead of the default "For you" feed, it's sorted chronologically and doesn't have ads

As an educator who has only ever worked with Moodle,
I agree that Canvas has better UX. I can't imagine another platform being as terrible to use in 2023 as Moodle lmao