relevants

joined 2 years ago
[–] relevants@feddit.de 13 points 2 years ago (11 children)

Auf die Wissenschaft hören ist irrational?

Was ist denn deiner Meinung nach rational? Dass das ja alles "halb so schlimm ist", weil es sich noch nicht dramatisch genug anfühlt? Klar, das ist viel logischer und nicht so von Gefühlen und Illusionen geprägt wie diese verrückten Wissenschaftler.

[–] relevants@feddit.de 41 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Na dann erzähl doch mal wer an Klimaschutz so großes wirtschaftliches Interesse hat? Wer profitiert jetzt, und für wen zahlen sich die Spenden aus?

[–] relevants@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You acknowledge there are legitimate reasons to be opposed to Musk, but at the same time you are discrediting anyone who has that opinion as "[not] to be taken seriously"?

Brushing off criticism as "hate" and "trendy" is counterproductive and whether you like it or not, says a lot about your own biases as well. If you are actually interested in genuine discourse, you should instead engage with the reasons why he is disliked, and make your case as to why they're not important/accurate/whatever. Because blindly defending him from "haters" is just as much a trend thing.

And before you accuse me of "[struggling] hard when having to state those reasons", there's a myriad of good reasons to think Musk is a bad person. From the way he treated his workers during the height of the pandemic, to the way he publicly treated Twitter employees fearing for their jobs, to the kinds of politics he's using Twitter to promote under the guise of "free speech", it's clear that he does not feel a need to be respectful to people he has control over. I don't know what your moral compass is, but I don't particularly care for selfish rulers.

[–] relevants@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Do you think people just hate the guy for fun? This isn't team sports, he's a disliked figure for many legitimate reasons, whether you agree with them or not.

[–] relevants@feddit.de 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

Ok..? Why is this news?

[–] relevants@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

A lot of compound words are actually multiple tokens so there's nothing stopping the LLM from generating the tokens in a new order thereby creating a new word.

[–] relevants@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago

I thought TypeScript wanted to avoid putting in syntax before it's ready in JS, but you might be right that they just know more than we do about when it's going to stage 4.

[–] relevants@feddit.de 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I get that, but the original game wasn't intended to be nearly as big as it turned out to be, so I'm not faulting them too much for having to release some should-be-base-game stuff later on. A lot of that will be included from the start in CS2 at least, like trams, bike lanes and better ped paths, so that's something.

[–] relevants@feddit.de 11 points 2 years ago (7 children)

Cities Skylines for me. It's like building my own little world that I would want to live and work in

[–] relevants@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

8-22h? Na das sollte doch wohl 9-13h und 15-17h sein, Mittwochs und Freitags ausschließlich 9-12h! Wer hat denn Zeit für so lange Sprechzeiten...

[–] relevants@feddit.de 8 points 2 years ago

As an AI language model,

Yup, that does kinda give it away.

[–] relevants@feddit.de 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Is TypeScript being a bit early here or is the TC39 proposal further along than I thought? Last I checked it was in stage 3 and still had a little ways to go..

view more: ‹ prev next ›