reddwarf

The difference here is that this ‘investigation’ was called for by republicans before they even knew what to investigate. And on top of that, even admitting they have no evidence to present (suspicions is not evidence) yet claim to have evidence. Witnesses they claim to have seem to be lost somehow and cannot be produced for investigation.

And based on this obviously flimsy, if not outright lies, you want to be ‘reasonable’?

I distrust your honesty

Getting:

We couldn't find the page you're looking for. Sorry!

I think they should take the lead from Gym Jordan and not show up. Be honest, did you come online and argue with republicans on ‘doing the right thing’? Hoe committed where you then?

And please, do us all a favor and try avoiding ‘be better’ or some nonsense like that.

Identity politics 😀

You answered your own question I think 😀

Would it be possible dor this bot to auto collapse? If I want to have this summary I can then fold it open and read. Thanks for the tldr bot but having it auto collapse would mean a cleaner interface.

CamelCase’ing nonsense none said here, using ya’ll to point at ‘the left’, do your own research tropes.

Oh, I’m using my critical thought, you just don’t like what is being said and pointed out.

I stand by my post on forcing ‘the left’ to keep digging. Keep asking for more. Keep semi-engaging while you have no outcome other then dwindling the points made into nothingness.

I will not engage with you anymore after this post as I will not be lured into a deceitful trap.

I suggest you find some republican or trump supporter (but I repeat myself) and try to have a civil and meaningful discussion where you challenge their views on politics where you ask for evidence, repeatedly. I fear that discussion will be solo though. Good luck.

The left/liberals always have to provide evidence and the right knows this and constantly force them to give more and more facts, always asking for more. Liberals feel compelled to comply. This is a trap set by right wingers to stifle meaningful discussion because you will be constantly on the defense.

Yet the right/conservatives are not bound by this and get away with baseless lies and it is useless to ask for evidence, you will either get nothing or false facts.

No matter what political affiliation you have, I would wager that the current mess was not created by 18 year olds voting but older people. So if you want to be ‘fair’ and ‘reasonable’, hoe about we put restrictions on older voters on a sliding and increasingly more difficult scale?

18 - 25 : your good to go 25 - 40 : you need some civics tests 40 - 60 : civic + psycholigical testing 60 - 70 : civics + psychological + dementia testing 70+ : you no longer get to vote as your time has past and consequences are no longer your concern yet can harm upcoming generations

If you want limitations and testing, this is a fair proposal. I guess you would logically have to agree with this, yes?

So the argument trump and his ilk use, that Biden is using the DOJ (hint; he isn’t) to persecute trump would be a valid action as he is the president and is allowed to, is moot? Or is only 1 specific potential president allowed to use this logic?

History will not be kind to republicans and conservatives.

And watch them all deny any involvement when the time comes. But they know the are on the wrong side of history and will feel that pang of guilt, knowing they supported a fascist movement. Like supporters and members of the nazi party at the time, the black mark on their conscience will be impossible to suppress.

If you know of trump supporters and voters, never ever let up. Always push that fact in their face. Republicans deserve nothing but contempt of society.

Fair means to him “be on his side and let him go free”