Does not stand to scrutiny. I counted and only 3 out of 13 are like that. And only two of those would post online.
redballooon
joined 2 years ago
I suppose the positions you are describing are not reached by reasoning, rather by being part of a group, religion or ideology. In those cases it’s quite clear that they can’t give up the position unless they weaken their ties to that group/religion/ideology, or abandon it entirely.
Some times in their life people are open to big changes, but most of the time not.
I have my phone unlock when it sees my face.
There’s Siri.
And GPT-4 is a good way to double check some suspicions how historical events may be connected, and when I’m looking for a name. And other things too.
Which is not a solution because just because while you pay less taxes you still have to go through the process
Just watch the Let’s Play if you want the movie 😀
Oh dear that comment really gets me angry. How can you be so sensible on social media!!
/s
Yes, but without the funny part
What happened there?
Pull it out. Look at the time. Remember I didn’t want to doomscroll. Put it back. Repeat.
You say that as if critical thinking was ever taught in school.
And this is the normal thing how it works Just not online because what’s said there doesn’t fade away. It just keeps up standing there regardless if the author since then changed their mind.