Die spd Verantwortlichen machen also geltend dass die Emails nicht nur cum ex relevante Informationen enthalten, sondern auch unabhängige Partei Themen in die der politische Gegner keinen Einblick haben soll. Das ist sogar verständlich, ist aber keinesfalls eine Rechtfertigung für einen solchen Vorgang, der durch und durch nach Verschleierung und Korruption stinkt. Wenn es wirklich nur um die Art des Zugriffs durch Mitglieder des Untersuchungsausschusses ging, wäre ein völlig anderer und sauberer Umgang mit dem Problem möglich gewesen.
redballooon
joined 2 years ago
First of all, gun laws have been more or less the same for the past 100 years in the U.S., so how can they be the cause of the recent rise in mass shootings? Simple answer: they’re not.
So guns changed over the past 100 years, but the laws did not adjust. Sounds like a bad idea. How can a new technology a cause for a new problem? Did that ever happen???/s
Semi-automatic rifles were not overly widespread before the 1990, and when they became, in 1994 there was a time-limited ban for semi-automatic firearms, which then expired in 2004. And what are the major concerns for mass shootings in recent years? It is semi-automatic firearms.
If they were serious about curbing gun violence, their focus wouldn’t be on mass shootings so much as smaller-scale gun crime.
Why do you think they want to ban all guns? But when you've a gun proponents such as in the US you gotta get real about what you can achieve. So it is not hypocrisy to focus on assault weaponry.
That hobby thing can be said about many forbidden things, for example smoking cannabis.
"Just ban guns" is the slogan for demonstrations. Any politician who is elected for doing that will obviously need to have a better plan. Usually such plans don't fit on a poster.
Civilian disarmamends happened in various countries, i.e. Australia in 1996/97, UK after the Dunblane school massacre in 1996, Japan post WW2, South Africa in 2000, Colombia in 2000 and 2016, New Zealand after Christchurch.
Strategies and success vary, but it's not unheard of.
Many liberals have terrible views about gun violence in general IMO, and a serious lack of comprehension of the problem.
Could you elaborate that a bit?
30€ + 7% macht 32,1€, + 19% macht 38,2€. Voila, man muss die Zahlen nur richtig jonglieren können.
Mindestens! Da kommt ja noch Inflation obendrauf!
Ein Rätsel bei welcher Wählergruppe der so viel Zustimmung findet.
ok so far.
It'll become funny once I understand the double meaning. What does it mean the way it is written "coo sticks"? I get the "coo" as the sound of the pidgeon, but the "sticks" escapes me.
It’s the algorithm that rewards 10sec engagement. An enraging title is enough for clicks, which means ads.
Your comment reads like you're addressing mostly the history since 2005 or so. I definitely see that Israel after the 2nd intifada has had a very different strategy than before, including these things that you outline.
Just don't ignore that there was a history before. There was an offer for a 2-state solution on the table where the world agreed it won't get any better. Arafat just walked away and started the 2nd intifada instead. Hamas is still much older than that. Irans support of the Hamas is newer, though.
It's so lame to blame it all on Israel. My take on this still is that for the security of Israel, it doesn't matter much what Israel does. Their tries for peace negotiations were largely ignored, and their hard crackdowns do shit for their security. The signal to deescalate the conflict must come from Iran, which will impact how Hamas and Hisbollah work.
Im letzten "Lage der Nation" Podcast haben die das alles durchdiskutiert und kamen zu dem Schluss, dass die FDP trotz aller Moserei kaum ein Interesse haben kann, die Ampel platzen zu lassen.
Es käme ja nicht zwingend zu Neuwahlen, bei denen die FDP zittern müsste. Der Kanzler wurde für die Legislaturperiode gewählt. Und der kann dann mit einer Minderheitsregierung sein Spiel versuchen. Damit kann er zwar kaum Gesetze verabschieden, aber ein grüner Verkehrsminister könnte z.B. den neuen Spielraum in der Straßenverkehrsordnung trotzdem nutzen. Andere Verordnungen kann eine Minderheitsregierung auch machen.
D.h. die FDP kann bei Verbleib in der Regierung weiterhin blockieren, und beim Ausscheiden aus der Regierung haben sie weniger Möglichkeiten, den anderen Regierungsparteien in die Suppe zu spucken.
Introducing regulations usually doesn’t mean complete and utter ban.