raunz

joined 2 years ago
[–] raunz@mander.xyz 11 points 2 years ago
[–] raunz@mander.xyz 25 points 2 years ago
[–] raunz@mander.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

As they say - I want to believe. But the evidence is not sufficient.

[–] raunz@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago

pork barrels

I don't doubt that

[–] raunz@mander.xyz 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

While it's expensive, it's only too expensive if someone else does the same cheaper. In terms of payload mass the only competition is Starship. Starship is still in development and has no successful launches, while SLS has 100% success rate with one launch. So if you want your heavy stuff, or people even, to get into space safely you better hand over the money to NASA.

[–] raunz@mander.xyz 1 points 2 years ago (4 children)

What's the problem with SLS?

[–] raunz@mander.xyz 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
[–] raunz@mander.xyz -1 points 2 years ago
[–] raunz@mander.xyz 25 points 2 years ago

Completely justified /s

World map

[–] raunz@mander.xyz 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Eat the rich (am vegetarian)

view more: ‹ prev next ›