randomname01

joined 2 years ago
[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 27 points 1 year ago

“Haha I don’t exercise” irks me in a way few other things do. Like, fair deuce if you don’t want to exercise, but acting like it’s super quirky and funny gives me a certain impression I really dislike.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

It’s a good way to look like you’re working

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Shoutout King Leopold

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also, fun fact: Jeroom’s partner is Élodie Ouédraogo, an Olympic gold medalist.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Right, I must’ve overlooked that. My bad.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You can easily use it with Nextcloud, to name one example. So yeah, it’s a good suggestion.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 4 points 1 year ago

They’re different tools, just use them alongside each other.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

They’re saying life is miserable, I’m saying it’s not inherently miserable. Like, that’s not a subjective take lol.

Also, what about my comment made it seem like they said it was 50/50? And even if I thought that’s what they said, how does that invalidate my argument?

Even in my comment I acknowledge there are multiple reasons not to have children, so I really don’t understand what you’re arguing against.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago

I get what you’re saying, but it just feels incredibly (and needlessly) defeatist to me.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago
  1. I don’t even have kids lol
  2. Calling people out for being condescending is not the same as being condescending. This reeks of the same mentality that people who unironically say hating racists makes you hateful and therefore just as bad as racists have.
[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I get that less workers would mean more power to the workers, but avoiding having kids to limit the supply of workers seems, idk, fucking weird and also weirdly passive?

You can protest, join a union, start a workers co-op or organise in different ways, but that takes effort. Or you could not have kids, which takes less effort than having kids, and say it’s praxis? Idk, to me this feels like packaging your own personal choice as a grand political stand, as if you would jump at the opportunity to have kids if we lived in a socialist society.

Also, to counter your point, historically a lot of protest and unrest came from a dissatisfied populace with not enough job opportunities. So by that logic you should just pop out kids so they’ll be a part of the revolution. I don’t believe this, to be clear, but I mention it as a way to illustrate that basing your decision to have kids on how it will affect the supply and demand of labour is really fucking weird, and also not even something with a predictable outcome.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But you’re basing that on your own negative experiences in life, and you’re acting like they’re objective and universal.

Also, by that logic you shouldn’t do anything that could potentially cascade into making someone else unhappy, which would be absolutely debilitating.

Don’t get me wrong, I get that you should think twice, thrice and even more about having kids, especially if you’re not in a position to give them a good life and/or if you have certain heritable issues. But your overall position seems overly negative and, idk, somewhat misanthropic? In your worldview humanity should just stop existing because people can be unhappy in life. It’s overly reductive and negative to me.

view more: ‹ prev next ›