rambling_lunatic

Because liberalism is a hypocritical ideology.

The USA built itself off genocide and colonialism and has spent the last three centuries expanding its empire to every continent (and has long-since been an attack dog for Israel).

France endorsed liberty, equality, and fraternity at home and horrors abroad in Haiti and Algeria.

To the credit of the Liberal Party, they were much less imperialist than the Whigs they derived from or Tories. This is not to say that they were truly opposed to imperialism. Cecil Rhodes was a Liberal.

In all of these cases, the colonial adventures did not occur despite liberalism but were justified by it. We must bring enlightened civilization to the savages, you see. Locke and Mill, two foundational British figures of liberalism, were both supporters of colonialism.

The Russian embassy in Ireland is on Orwell Road. Simple and fitting.

Neoliberalism, obviously. Kamala probably wouldn't be in favour of people being abducted off the street and shoved into unmarked vans.

The point is that socialism cannot be achieved by electoral means. At best, if the masses in the street really pressure those in power, you get social democracy. That being said the choice for Americans was neoliberalism or fascism. The reasons for fascism winning go deeper than "the left was to whinny", but that's beside the point being made here.

Lord of War is unironically one of my favourite movies of all time

Не твоё дело (literally translated to "not your business/deal")

Direct and to the point. Not many can boast to be this good at communication.

The circled A

Socialism taken to the extreme ends in anarchism. Now if you decide to muddle "giving power to the workers" and "giving power to the workers' party" things reach type 3 fun very fast.

Under Trump they started shipping the repression back home

Every day we learn something is a happy day for us

I think you and I think of different meanings for "your man". Never said that Trump wasn't a gombeen piece of shit.