rah

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

I have been entirely rational.

I disagree.

I explained in shorthand

Try explaining in longhand. Then you will have explained. If you explain "in shorthand" then you haven't explained.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I don't care about drivel, no.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You're not being rational.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Still don't understand why imperialism is still around if it defeats itself.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

How's that not basically the definition of utopia?

LOL it's not because that's how concepts work.

the revolution

What revolution?

the vanguard party and the grassroots organizations coalesce and take power from the bourgeoisie

What's the Marxist plan for preventing the people who take power from becoming the new exploiters? How do Marxists propose to overcome the fact that power corrupts?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Processes take time.

And? Still not answered the question.

Trajectories matter.

To what? What trajectories?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

The Price of Tea in China.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

For the same reason that it's not a carpet as I understand it.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

I have.

I disagree.

What's unanswered?

Why imperialism is still around (if it defeats itself).

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

What you're talking about.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Supporting movements in the Global South against Imperialism

We're not communicating. That's not a "solution" as I understand it.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 1 year ago (8 children)

You haven't answered my question.

view more: ‹ prev next ›