rah

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rah@feddit.uk 41 points 11 months ago (12 children)

The future is here.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago
[–] rah@feddit.uk 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Who on Earth thought there was any adaptation?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Downvoted for misleading, incorrect title

[–] rah@feddit.uk -1 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] rah@feddit.uk 3 points 11 months ago

LOL true, it's always been a failure of mine.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

the very tone of this thread is suggesting that the HA developers choice in how they distribute their platform is "incorrect"

Not incorrect, just poor engineering. Anti-social ultimately.

you seem to disagree with explanations provided as to why those choices were likely made

I can see only two disagreements in the whole post. Only one of those is about the reasons for creating an OS rather than distro packages. I have corrected a number of factual errors and errors in reasoning but those aren't disagreements.

Dismissing those statements and observations do not make them incorrect.

Yes, my dismissing of them is not what makes them incorrect.

Nothing I stated is dramatic

LOL "this evil developer is doing a sinister thing"

[–] rah@feddit.uk -3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

this evil developer is doing a sinister thing

Nobody has said that here.

that community

I've no idea what community you're referring to. Nobody here has demanded that any developers cater to their distribution's needs.

If your community is getting cut off because, frankly, it's being unreasonable... don't come here looking for a personal army.

Again, I've no idea what community you're referring to. Nobody has come here looking for a personal army.

Your characterisation of the commentary on this post seems like that of an overly. dramatic. teenager.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

This appears to bother a particular community who feel entitled enough to demand multiple developers cater to their distribution’s needs.

Your reading of the situation is wrong.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

this is probably a ton of work, for which a purpose-built solution already exists: Docker

LOL Docker isn't a "solution" to the pressure of good engineering.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -2 points 11 months ago (13 children)

it could not feasible

I disagree.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

He alone has behaved like a child, dragging his end users along with him in his over-reliance on one failure point for his entire distribution system

Yeah, this is exactly as expected. Someone with poor engineering skills finding themselves in a position of power and making sure everyone knows they're king of the hill. See this kind of thing all the time unfortunately :-(

view more: ‹ prev next ›