Are detrans discussions prohibited?
If you want to have these discussions, then you need to do it in an appropriate context. The comment section under a trans article isn’t really the best place as this comes across as trollish and like you’re trying to sneak in transphobia under the guise of philosophy.
And so following from your other comments, the appropriate contexts you're referring to are outside of the feddit.uk instance entirely? The instance is never an appropriate context and any such discussion whatsoever is prohibited?
Instance-level rules and guidelines are going to be general purpose.
So if someone created a linguistic philosophy community on feddit.uk and in that community members held a discussion on 'a trans person’s “I’m a man” as less than a cis person’s “I’m a man”', is that prohibited or not?
That seems a bit presumptuous? What if someone creates some !linguistic_philosophy@feddit.uk community?
Why dictate the purposes to which feddit.uk can be put? Why declare any purpose, "social discussion" or otherwise?
This is pretty categorically not a conservative forum
What is not?
This is a social discussion forum not a linguist philosophy one
What is? Feddit.uk?
As if defederation were ever a suggestion? As if it were even possibility?
I believe one instance already has defederated from feddit.uk because of a perceived tolerance of transphobia.
4k players
Are you talking about software players or 4k decks?
They are both perfectly fine editors but they don't hold a candle to a proper IDE
I'm not sure what you mean by "proper" in this context. Every IDE I've ever used has seemed like a child's toy compared to Emacs. An annoying child's toy with cracks and sharp edges.
I also want to play some games that go beyond the production values of SuperTuxKart and Battle for Wesnoth.
Try 0 A.D. or FreeOrion.
Are detrans discussions prohibited?
I asked before but didn't get a response.