rah

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago

Not explicitly

You said it "mentions ... only that proton will". Now you're saying it doesn't mention proton.

How do you think it does that? Through proton.

The issue is not about how games might be able to run but about what you wrote in your comment.

[–] rah@feddit.uk -3 points 10 months ago (4 children)

You're just repeating the article. Nothing you said contradicts what I said.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 0 points 10 months ago

It's a HINT

What is?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

“One could not be a successful scientist without realizing that, in contrast to the popular conception supported by newspapers and mothers of scientists, a goodly number of scientists are not only narrow-minded and dull, but also just stupid.” ― James D. Watson, The Double Helix

[–] rah@feddit.uk -1 points 10 months ago

LOL yes I know thanks.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 41 points 10 months ago (15 children)

The number of kaon to pion and neutrino/antineutrino decays the team observed is higher than the 8.4 per 100 billion predicted by the Standard Model, but it's still within the uncertainty parameters.

So then how the fuck does that hint at new physics? Idiots.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago (7 children)

mentions ... only that proton will be able to properly translate for them

Where is that mentioned?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

“It’s like influencers who are going to Syria, just doing travel vlogs from Syria without talking about years and years of war and devastation. You can’t do that, and you can’t do that in Xinjiang either.”

Actually you can.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Maybe youre used to a shithole country like america

No, I'm in the UK, as was the exploiting university.

The schools apprentice makes whatever we tell them.

The issue is not what they make or who tells them to make it. The issue is what happens to the things they make after they're made and who benefits.

the gifts

Gifts? You mean the things you tell them to make or are you talking about other things they give to you?

how miserable they are

O_o

[–] rah@feddit.uk 4 points 10 months ago
[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

also to make nice, shiny stuff for me

I'd be very surprised if that was explicit and in writing. Having been exploited by teachers at university, I'm sensitive to this kind of thing. Your students are not there to make stuff for your benefit. It seems to me like you're exploiting them.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 3 points 10 months ago (6 children)

I hope you paid your student for their labour.

view more: ‹ prev next ›