rah

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rah@feddit.uk 8 points 8 months ago (4 children)

the truth is 5 billion light years from you wondering about your existence

What?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

When you ignore politics, you are tacitly agreeing

No.

Shunning politics is saying "my time on this earth is so precious, I can waste no time on thoughts of those less fortunate than I"

No.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 8 months ago

Will Supposedly Fix the Climate

Uhh... wut?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 5 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Linux, the kernel so associated with Free Software, was at some point proprietary.

ROFL what an ignorant fool

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago

It is a political tool ...

What is?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 3 points 9 months ago (2 children)

national narrative

WTF is that?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

a lot of the Fediverse may not be ready for primetime ... lacking in key features

Such as?

[–] rah@feddit.uk -1 points 9 months ago

in this case, we know it's not because they got rid of that option. Why? Because the task is infeasible to support.

You're not making any sense.

the devs no longer offer it as a supported method

Are you saying that the Home Assistant developers used to support distro packages?

No one is saying it is impossible

OP is saying that. They said it was "infeasible".

[–] rah@feddit.uk -1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Well, yeah.

Why do you think that because a person could do something they necessarily will?

[–] rah@feddit.uk -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

it isn't actually that feasible then, otherwise you'd do more than just whine about it on the Internet

So let me get your logic straight: you're saying that it isn't feasible because if it were feasible then a person who could do it would necessarily do it? LOL that makes no sense.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 9 months ago

you get a philosophical AI that thinks

LLMs don't think.

view more: ‹ prev next ›