How the fsck is this news?
The legality of re-distributing the leaked source is questionable at best.
LOL no shit. I'll steer well clear of that one I think.
messages would still go through Google and their servers
As I understand it, there is nothing Google-specific in the standard. At the moment, Google is the main (only?) provider of RCS services to mobile networks though so data is highly likely to go through Google servers. However, that's not mandated by the standard, it's just a consequence of the current state of the market.
Don't think it's an amanita because it doesn't have spots on the cap (which I believe is one of the ways to distinguish). Could be wrong though.
I dare say, not in this case
Travis Taylor PhD, their main scientist in the project, who is also part of the Pentagon UAP task force, is adamant that whatever we see on the show, is real.
Oh wow, a PhD. Must be telling the truth.
I think that there's something going on there for sure.
Well with reasoning like that, who can argue?
they're probably just AI-driven security measures that interact with the consciousness of the surrounding people
LOL
Looks like it might be a Russula.
nothing has happened
Dafuq are you talking about?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gpl-violations.org#Notable_victories
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BusyBox#GPL_lawsuits
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linksys_WRT54G_series#Third-party_firmware_projects
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_Freedom_Conservancy#Litigation
Against the terms of use? Yes.
The terms of use are legally binding. If you violate the terms of use, you're breaking the law.
Illegal? Sort of, but practically not until somebody proves it in court.
Not sure what you're trying to say here. Violating copyright is against the law.
What machine is it?
No reasoning. Snore.
I find it interesting that the salad gets no mention at all, as if it's not part of the meal, like it's not real food.