rah

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

How is this antiwork? It's workers arguing about work.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

recurrent processing theory, global workspace theory, higher-order theories, predictive processing, and attention schema theory

snore

[–] rah@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago

This is normalising pathological behaviour.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago (6 children)

England seems to traditionally have the toilet separate from the house and for some reason the bidet trend never caught on

Uh... wut?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

some societies clearly had prosocial tendencies

All societies must necessarily be prosocial, it's how our species evolved to survive, just like prosocial tendencies are necessary for ants.

But that's different from saying we didn't evolve to be selfish like the post's article claims. Humans are always trying to get what they themselves want, even if that's just a drink or a blanket to keep warm.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

huge diversity of social models in old communities of humans

Do they claim that any of the humans in these communities live their lives not trying to get what they want?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 9 points 2 years ago

Patches are welcome.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Light on details this article. Not convinced.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

I thought the lora physical layer was proprietary and a black box?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 6 points 2 years ago

so well

What do you mean?

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago

I don't think we have anything like a minimal spectrum governance model.

I'm curious what you think is excessive?

The entity which governs spectrum probably doesn't need to be the one that governs borders.

They aren't really, they're distinct parts.

hopefully better than the current solution

This is not a good sell.

[–] rah@feddit.uk 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

You jam me and I'll just jam you back.

Exactly. In radio frequency terms, this is the same thing as civil war. And we institute governments in order to prevent that situation.

See for example, the Seattle CHOP/CHAZ which very quickly descended into violence, ultimately ending in an escape to government and police.

members acting as their own enforcement

The point is that this won't work.

Again, the goal is not no government, its reducing down to the minimum required governance and heirarchy to accomplish that goal.

At least in terms of radio spectrum allocation, that's what we have now.

how do we prevent large corporations from ruining things

This is nothing specific to large corporations. I can envision amateur radio operators entering into feuds or disrupting others out of spite or jealousy. "Ruining things" is normal human behaviour. Like the killers in Seattle.

view more: ‹ prev next ›