like a good :LIB:
keep feeding your ![brainworms]
Again, no idea what you're talking about.
like a good :LIB:
keep feeding your ![brainworms]
Again, no idea what you're talking about.
your deflection
LOL you've confused me for someone who cares what you think of me.
entirely self-serving if you are not of the working class
otherwise you're just another temporarily embarrassed millionaire
I've no idea what you're rambling on about.
you will bootstrap yourself to the ruling class
Not likely.
class traitor
LOL
Capital is reckless of the health or length of life of the labourer
So are fellow labourers.
This isn't "capital", this is just humans.
That is pretty much exactly the goal of the Wikimedia Foundation
Their goal isn't to collect all human knowledge, only notable human knowledge.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_an_indiscriminate_collection_of_information .
you do not ever need to see or interact with your neighbors
I'm not sure why you're trying to tell me this. I've got my own experience living in apartments and having neighbours.
I have experience none of these in the cities
I grew up in a house in a city with a garden with a lawn which had to be regularly mowed with a lawnmower. We don't have "HOA"s in our country.
Also there are in general lawn mowing and leaf blowing are much more moderate in city, because they know they are surrounded by people.
Wow. Your country is very different from my country.
I don't see why you would expect an absense of these things in a city?
I don't care how much they do, I care about how close they all are to me while they do it.
I don't know about that. I don't live in America and I've never lived in suburbs. I have lived in flats (apartments) and in dense areas.
This isn't a particularly convincing analogy.
I think you replied in the wrong place? I didn't give an analogy.
I'm not arguing against socialism/communism, I'm arguing against the first paragraph in the meme you posted.
I don't.
This is faulty logic. The fact that an understanding of the world includes benefits to capitalists and bosses doesn't imply that the understanding of the world either (1) is incorrect or (2) came through their instruction. You've shown neither of those to be true.
I appreciate it is painful to acknowledge that bosses exploit workers and that one can find comfort imagining that the exploitation is due to factors which can be altered but wishing it to be so doesn't make it so.
Their boss may well give them an incentive not to cooperate but that doesn't mean there aren't other, much more primal forces pushing towards the same end. Looking at the behaviour of workers and all humans for that matter, they don't seem to need any encouragement in order to step on each other.